E J Balthazar, R Gordon, D Hulnick
Ileocecal tuberculosis: CT and radiologic evaluation.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Mar;154(3):499-503. doi: 10.2214/ajr.154.3.2106212.
Abstract/Text
The CT and radiologic findings in 11 patients (five with AIDS and six without AIDS) with ileocecal tuberculosis are described. On CT scans, five cases showed mild circumferential wall thickening of the terminal ileum and cecum, thickening of the ileocecal valve, and a few regional nodes. One case presented as nonspecific small-bowel obstruction. In five patients a more characteristic CT appearance was detected: preferential thickening of the ileocecal valve and medial wall of the cecum, exophytic extension engulfing the terminal ileum, and massive lymphadenopathy with low-density areas consistent with caseation necrosis. Patients with AIDS had a more severe form of involvement than those who did not have AIDS. Barium studies showed ileocecal changes consistent with an inflammatory process. In conjunction with barium enema, CT is helpful in the initial evaluation of ileocecal tuberculosis, showing the location and extent of intestinal and mesenteric involvement in most cases. Characteristic CT findings are seen when the inflammatory process is severe.
Govind K Makharia, Siddharth Srivastava, Prasenjit Das, Pooja Goswami, Urvashi Singh, Manasee Tripathi, Vaishali Deo, Ashish Aggarwal, Rajeew P Tiwari, V Sreenivas, Siddhartha Datta Gupta
Clinical, endoscopic, and histological differentiations between Crohn's disease and intestinal tuberculosis.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Mar;105(3):642-51. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.585. Epub 2010 Jan 19.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVES: The clinical, endoscopic, and histological features of Crohn's disease (CD) and intestinal tuberculosis mimic each other so much that it becomes difficult to differentiate between them. The aim was to find out clinical, endoscopic, and histological predictor features for differentiation between CD and intestinal tuberculosis.
METHODS: We recruited 106 patients, 53 each with CD and intestinal tuberculosis, in this study. The clinical, histological, and endoscopic features were subjected to univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses. On the basis of regression coefficients of the final multivariate logistic model, a score to discriminate between CD and intestinal tuberculosis was devised. For the validation of the score, the same model was tested on 20 new patients, each with CD and intestinal tuberculosis.
RESULTS: On univariate analysis, although longer duration of disease, chronic diarrhea, blood in stool, perianal disease, extra-intestinal manifestations, involvement of left colon, skip lesions, aphthous ulcers, cobblestoning, longitudinal ulcers, focally enhanced colitis, and microgranulomas were significantly more common in CD, partial intestinal obstruction, constipation, presence of nodular lesions, higher number, and larger granulomas were significantly more common in intestinal tuberculosis. On multivariate analysis, blood in stool (odds ratio (OR) 0.1 (confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.5)), weight loss (OR 9.8 (CI 2.2-43.9)), histologically focally enhanced colitis (OR 0.1 (CI 0.03-0.5)), and involvement of sigmoid colon (OR 0.07(0.01-0.3)) were independent predictors of intestinal tuberculosis. On the basis of regression coefficients of the final multivariate logistic model, a score that varied from 0.3 to 9.3 was devised. Higher score predicted more likelihood of intestinal tuberculosis. Once the cutoff was set at 5.1, then the sensitivity, specificity, and ability to correctly classify the two diseases were 83.0, 79.2, and 81.1%, respectively. Area under the curve for receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) to assess the ability of these features to discriminate between CD and intestinal tuberculosis was 0.9089. The area under ROC in the validation data set was 89.2% (95% CI 0.79-0.99). With a similar cutoff score of 5.1, sensitivity and specificity in the validation model were 90% (95% CI 66.9-98.2) and 60% (95% CI 36.4-80.0), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Blood in stool, weight loss, focally enhanced colitis, and involvement of the sigmoid colon were the most important features in differentiating CD from intestinal tuberculosis.
S Shah, V Thomas, M Mathan, A Chacko, G Chandy, B S Ramakrishna, D D Rolston
Colonoscopic study of 50 patients with colonic tuberculosis.
Gut. 1992 Mar;33(3):347-51. doi: 10.1136/gut.33.3.347.
Abstract/Text
Fifty patients with colonic tuberculosis are reported in whom a colonoscopic diagnosis confirmed by histological examination was possible in 40. Bacteriological studies did not increase the diagnostic yield. Abdominal pain was the most common symptom (90%) and an abdominal mass the most common abnormal physical finding (58%). A nodular mucosa with areas of ulceration was the usual colonoscopic finding. Ileocaecal disease was found in 16, ileocaecal and contiguous ascending colon disease in 14, segmental colonic tuberculosis in 13, ileocaecal disease and non-confluent involvement of another part of the colon in five, and pancolitis in two patients. This report emphasises that colonoscopy is a useful procedure for diagnosing colonic tuberculosis and that segmental colonic tuberculosis is not uncommon.
K M Kim, A Lee, K Y Choi, K Y Lee, J J Kwak
Intestinal tuberculosis: clinicopathologic analysis and diagnosis by endoscopic biopsy.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 Apr;93(4):606-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.173_b.x.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVES: Tuberculosis is still an important cause of granulomatous colitis in developing countries. If we can diagnose tuberculosis using endoscopic biopsy material, clinicians can avoid invasive diagnostic procedures and needless operations. For this purpose, we evaluated clinical manifestations, pathological findings, and diagnostic methods in endoscopically biopsied intestinal tuberculosis patients.
METHODS: From January 1991 to December 1996, 42 patients with intestinal tuberculosis were endoscopically examined and tissue culture, immunohistochemical stain, Ziehl-Neelsen stain, and polymerase chain reaction in fresh and fixed tissue were applied. The pathological findings were analyzed and compared with the results of the other diagnostic methods.
RESULTS: In tuberculosis patients, transverse ulcers with surrounding hypertrophic mucosa and multiple erosions were usual colonoscopic findings. The granulomas were found in 74% of the cases. The positivity ranged from 30-45%. There were no significant differences in the positivity among those diagnostic methods (p > 0.05). The positivity of Ziehl-Neelsen stain in fixed tissue was higher in the group having granulomas and it was reversed in PCR (p < 0.05). The increasing number of biopsy particles raised the positivity of Ziehl-Neelsen stain and PCR in fixed tissue (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Transverse ulcers were the most characteristic colonoscopic finding and granulomas were frequent pathological findings in intestinal tuberculosis. Higher positivity and reliable results were found in tissue culture, Ziehl-Neelsen stain, and polymerase chain reaction. To increase the diagnostic rate, the endoscopist should take enough tissue and deep biopsy material from ulcer bases and diseased mucosae.
