Gotoh M, Yokoyama O, Nishizawa O; Japanese Propiverine Study Group.
Propiverine hydrochloride in Japanese patients with overactive bladder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Int J Urol. 2011 May;18(5):365-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02732.x. Epub 2011 Feb 20.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of propiverine for overactive bladder (OAB) in Japanese patients.
METHODS: In this multicentre, randomized, double-blind study, patients ≥ 20 years old with symptoms of OAB for ≥ 12 weeks were allocated to either propiverine (20 mg once daily) or placebo for 12 weeks. Efficacy and quality of life were assessed using a 7-day bladder diary, the OAB symptom score, and King's Health Questionnaire. Safety was mainly assessed by adverse events and the QTc interval.
RESULTS: A total of 567 patients were allocated. Change in number of micturitions/24 h was significantly greater in the propiverine group than in the placebo group (-1.86 vs-1.36, P = 0.001). Compared to placebo, propiverine produced significant improvements in urgency, urgency incontinence, urine volume/micturition, and the OAB symptom score. Significant improvements in urgency, urgency incontinence, and micturition frequency were observed at the first 4 weeks of treatment. All nine domains of King's Health Questionnaire were improved more with propiverine than with placebo. Adverse effects with propiverine were mostly mild, and no patient developed QTc interval prolongation exceeding 500 ms.
CONCLUSION: Propiverine is effective for Japanese OAB patients by improving their symptoms and quality of life with a predictable side-effect profile.
© 2011 The Japanese Urological Association.
Yamaguchi O, Marui E, Kakizaki H, Itoh N, Yokota T, Okada H, Ishizuka O, Ozono S, Gotoh M, Sugiyama T, Seki N, Yoshida M; Japanese Solifenacin Study Group.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo- and propiverine-controlled trial of the once-daily antimuscarinic agent solifenacin in Japanese patients with overactive bladder.
BJU Int. 2007 Sep;100(3):579-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07031.x.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVES: To compare solifenacin succinate (5 and 10 mg once-daily) to placebo and propiverine hydrochloride (20 mg once-daily), respectively, in Japanese patients with overactive bladder syndrome (OAB).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicentre, 12-week, double-blind phase III trial randomized men and women aged > or = 20 years with OAB to solifenacin 5 or 10 mg, propiverine 20 mg, or placebo. Changes at endpoint in number of voids/24 h, urgency, incontinence, urgency incontinence and nocturia episodes, volume voided/void, restoration of continence and quality of life (QoL) were examined.
RESULTS: Of 1593 patients randomized, 1584 were treated; at the endpoint there were greater reductions in mean (sd) voids/24 h with solifenacin 5 mg, at -1.93 (1.97), and 10 mg, at -2.19 (2.09), and propiverine 20 mg, at -1.87 (2.70), than with placebo, at -0.94 (2.29) (P < 0.001 for all). Solifenacin (5 and 10 mg) was superior to placebo, and no worse than propiverine 20 mg, for this variable. There were significantly fewer mean (sd) urgency, incontinence and urgency incontinence episodes with solifenacin and propiverine than with placebo, with respective changes on placebo of - 1.28 (2.90), - 0.72 (1.95) and - 0.69 (2.00); solifenacin 5 mg, - 2.41 (2.88), -1.59 (2.12) and -1.45 (1.89) (P < 0.001 for all), and 10 mg, -2.78 (2.82), - 1.60 (1.81) and - 1.52 (1.77) (P < 0.001 for all), and propiverine 20 mg, -2.30 (3.08), -1.25 (2.79) and - 1.19 (2.20) (P < 0.001, = 0.002 and = 0.002 respectively). All active treatments vs placebo improved the volume voided (P < 0.001 for all) and QoL; solifenacin 10 mg reduced nocturia episodes (P = 0.021) and significantly improved urgency episodes (P = 0.012) and volume voided (P = 0.009) vs propiverine 20 mg, and solifenacin 5 mg caused less dry mouth (P = 0.003). Solifenacin 10 mg caused more dry mouth (P = 0.012) and occurrences of constipation (P = 0.004) than propiverine 20 mg, but discontinuation rates between both treatment groups were similar. Continence was restored at endpoint in more than half of the patients on active treatment.
CONCLUSION: Solifenacin 5 and 10 mg once daily significantly improved the symptoms of OAB compared with placebo. Solifenacin therapy at 5 mg once daily is well-tolerated; 10 mg can be given if additional efficacy is required.
Chapple CR, Martinez-Garcia R, Selvaggi L, Toozs-Hobson P, Warnack W, Drogendijk T, Wright DM, Bolodeoku J; STAR study group.
A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of solifenacin succinate and extended release tolterodine at treating overactive bladder syndrome: results of the STAR trial.
Eur Urol. 2005 Sep;48(3):464-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.05.015.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVE: To compare two new generation antimuscarinics at their recommended doses for treatment of overactive bladder syndrome (OAB).
METHODS: A prospective, double blind, double-dummy, two-arm, parallel-group, 12-week study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of solifenacin 5 or 10 mg and tolterodine extended release (ER) 4 mg once daily in OAB patients. After 4 weeks of treatment patients had the option to request a dose increase but were dummied throughout as approved product labelling only allowed an increase for those on solifenacin.
RESULTS: Solifenacin, with a flexible dosing regimen, showed greater efficacy to tolterodine in decreasing urgency episodes, incontinence, urge incontinence and pad usage and increasing the volume voided per micturition. More solifenacin treated patients became continent and reported improvements in perception of bladder condition assessments. The majority of side effects were mild to moderate in nature, and discontinuations were comparable and low in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Solifenacin, with a flexible dosing regimen, was found to be superior to tolterodine ER with respect to the majority of the efficacy variables.
Homma Y, Yamaguchi O; Imidafenacin Study Group.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and propiverine-controlled trial of the novel antimuscarinic agent imidafenacin in Japanese patients with overactive bladder.
Int J Urol. 2009 May;16(5):499-506. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02286.x. Epub 2009 Mar 29.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of imidafenacin, a novel antimuscarinic agent, with propiverine and a placebo in Japanese patients with overactive bladder (OAB).
METHODS: Men and women having OAB symptoms were randomized to double-blind treatment with 0.1 mg of imidafenacin twice daily, 20 mg of propiverine once daily, or a placebo for 12 weeks, and assessed for efficacy and safety.
RESULTS: Overall, 781 patients were randomized to imidafenacin (324), propiverine (310), or a placebo (147). After 12 weeks of treatment, a significantly larger reduction in the mean number of incontinence episodes was observed in the imidafenacin group than in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). The non-inferiority of imidafenacin compared with propiverine was confirmed for the reduction in using incontinence episodes (P = 0.0014, non-inferiority margin: 14.5%). Imidafenacin was well tolerated. The incidence of adverse events with imidafenacin was significantly lower than with propiverine (P = 0.0101). Dry mouth, the most common adverse event, was significantly more common in the propiverine group than in the imidafenacin group (P = 0.0302). There were no significant increases in either the imidafenacin or placebo group in the mean QTc interval, whereas there was a significant increase in the mean QTc interval in the propiverine group (P < 0.0001), but there were no clinical arrhythmia and clinical arrhythmic events in any of the treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The novel antimuscarinic agent imidafenacin at a dose of 0.1 mg twice daily was not inferior to propiverine for the reduction of incontinence episodes, and well tolerated for the treatment of OAB symptoms.
Homma Y, Paick JS, Lee JG, Kawabe K; Japanese and Korean Tolterodine Study Group.
Clinical efficacy and tolerability of extended-release tolterodine and immediate-release oxybutynin in Japanese and Korean patients with an overactive bladder: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
BJU Int. 2003 Nov;92(7):741-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04468.x.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVE: To compare extended-release (ER) tolterodine and immediate-release (IR) oxybutynin with placebo in Japanese and Korean patients with an overactive bladder (OAB).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men and women aged >or= 20 years with symptoms of urinary urgency, urinary frequency (>or= 8 micturitions/24 h), urge incontinence (>or= 5 episodes/week) and symptoms of OAB for >or= 6 months were randomized to double-blind treatment with tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily, oxybutynin IR 3 mg three times daily or placebo for 12 weeks. Efficacy assessments included changes from baseline in numbers of incontinence episodes per week, voids/24 h and mean volume voided/void. Patient perceptions of bladder condition, urgency and treatment benefit were also assessed.
RESULTS: In all, 608 patients were randomized to treatment with tolterodine (240), oxybutynin (246) or placebo (122). More patients prematurely withdrew on oxybutynin (23%) than with tolterodine (10.4%) or placebo (16.4%). After 12 weeks of treatment, the median number of incontinence episodes/week was reduced significantly more in the tolterodine (79%; P= 0.0027) and oxybutynin groups (76.5%; P= 0.0168) than on placebo (46.4%). There were also significantly greater improvements in the number of voids/24 h and volume voided/void with tolterodine and oxybutynin than with placebo. More patients in the tolterodine and oxybutynin than in the placebo groups reported improvements in perceived bladder condition, ability to hold urine and treatment benefit. Patients treated with oxybutynin reported more adverse events than those treated with tolterodine or placebo. Dry mouth was significantly more common with oxybutynin than with tolterodine (53.7% vs. 33.5%; P < 0.001), and occurred in 9.8% of placebo patients.
CONCLUSION: Tolterodine ER has similar efficacy but is better tolerated than oxybutynin IR in Japanese and Korean patients with OAB.
Wagg A, Khullar V, Marschall-Kehrel D, Michel MC, Oelke M, Darekar A, Bitoun CE, Weinstein D, Osterloh I.
Flexible-dose fesoterodine in elderly adults with overactive bladder: results of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of fesoterodine in an aging population trial.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Feb;61(2):185-93. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12088. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of flexible-dose fesoterodine in elderly adults with overactive bladder (OAB).
DESIGN: Twelve-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
SETTING: Sixty-one outpatient clinics in Europe, Israel, and Turkey.
PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred ninety-four individuals aged 65 and older (47% male) with OAB symptoms for 3 months or longer, mean of eight or more micturitions and three or more urgency episodes per 24 hours, at least some moderate problems on Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 20 or greater.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to fesoterodine or placebo for 12 weeks, with stratification according to age (>75 vs ≤ 75) and dosing time (morning vs evening). Participants receiving fesoterodine started on 4 mg and could increase to 8 mg at week 4 or 8 and de-escalate to 4 mg at week 8 (sham escalation for placebo).
MEASUREMENTS: Changes from baseline in bladder-diary variables (primary endpoint, urgency episodes) and patient-reported outcomes including OAB Questionnaire, Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS), PPBC, Urgency Perception Scale (UPS), and OAB Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-S); all observed or reported adverse events.
RESULTS: By week 8, 64% of fesoterodine-treated and 71% of placebo-treated participants opted for dose escalation. At week 12, the fesoterodine group had statistically significantly greater improvement than the placebo group in urgency episodes, micturitions, nocturnal micturitions, incontinence pad use, and OAB Questionnaire scores but not urgency urinary incontinence episodes. Responder rates on TBS, PPBC, UPS, and OAB-S were statistically significantly higher with fesoterodine. Improvements in most diary variables and participant-reported outcomes were greater with fesoterodine than placebo in participants in both age groups and when administered in the morning and evening. Rates of dry mouth and constipation were 34% and 9% with fesoterodine and 5% and 3% with placebo, respectively. Rates of adverse events and discontinuations were generally similar in participants in both age groups. There was no change in MMSE score.
CONCLUSION: Fesoterodine was associated with significantly greater improvements in most diary variables and participant-reported outcomes than placebo and was generally well tolerated in older people.
© 2013, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2013, The American Geriatrics Society.
Dubeau CE, Kraus SR, Griebling TL, Newman DK, Wyman JF, Johnson TM 2nd, Ouslander JG, Sun F, Gong J, Bavendam T.
Effect of fesoterodine in vulnerable elderly subjects with urgency incontinence: a double-blind, placebo controlled trial.
J Urol. 2014 Feb;191(2):395-404. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.08.027. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
Abstract/Text
PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of flexible dose fesoterodine in medically complex vulnerable elderly subjects with urgency urinary incontinence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 12-week, randomized, double-blind, flexible dose, placebo controlled trial, subjects were community dwelling men and women 65 years old or older. Subjects had scores of 3 or more on the VES-13 (Vulnerable Elders Survey) and 20 or more on the MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination), and 2 to 15 urgency urinary incontinence episodes and 8 or more micturitions per 24 hours on 3-day baseline diaries. Subjects randomized to fesoterodine received 4 mg once daily for 4 weeks and could then increase to 8 mg based on discussion with the investigator. Subjects receiving 8 mg could decrease the dose to 4 mg at any time (sham escalation and de-escalation for placebo). The primary outcome measure was change in daily urgency urinary incontinence episodes. Secondary outcomes included changes in other diary variables and patient reported quality of life measures. Safety evaluations included self-reported symptoms and post-void residual volume.
RESULTS: A total of 562 patients were randomized (mean age 75 years, 50.4% age 75 years or greater). Subjects had high rates of comorbidities, polypharmacy and functional impairment. At week 12 the fesoterodine group had significantly greater improvements in urgency urinary incontinence episodes per 24 hours (-2.84 vs -2.20, p = 0.002) and most other diary variables and quality of life, as well as a higher diary dry rate (50.8% vs 36.0%, p = 0.002). Adverse effects were generally similar to those of younger populations including risk of urinary retention.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first antimuscarinic study in a community based, significantly older, medically complex elderly population with urgency urinary incontinence. Flexible dose fesoterodine significantly improved urgency urinary incontinence episodes and other outcomes vs placebo, and was generally well tolerated.
Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Oelke M, Becher K, Castro-Diaz D, Chartier-Kastler E, Kirby M, Wagg A, Wehling M.
Appropriateness of oral drugs for long-term treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in older persons: results of a systematic literature review and international consensus validation process (LUTS-FORTA 2014).
Age Ageing. 2015 Sep;44(5):745-55. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv077. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
Abstract/Text
AIM: we aimed to systematically review drugs to treat lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) regularly used in older persons to classify appropriate and inappropriate drugs based on efficacy, safety and tolerability by using the Fit fOR The Aged (FORTA) classification.
METHODS: to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of drugs used for treatment of LUTS in older persons, a systematic review was performed. Papers on clinical trials and summaries of individual product characteristics were analysed regarding efficacy and safety in older persons (≥65 years). The most frequently used drugs were selected based on current prescription data. An interdisciplinary international expert panel assessed the drugs in a Delphi process.
RESULTS: for the 16 drugs included here, a total of 896 citations were identified; of those, only 25 reported clinical trials with explicit data on, or solely performed in older people, underlining the lack of evidence in older people for drug treatment of LUTS. No drug was rated at the FORTA-A-level (indispensable). Only three were assigned to FORTA B (beneficial): dutasteride, fesoterodine and finasteride. The majority was rated FORTA C (questionable): darifenacin, mirabegron, extended release oxybutynin, silodosin, solifenacin, tadalafil, tamsulosin, tolterodine and trospium. FORTA D (avoid) was assigned to alfuzosin, doxazosin, immediate release oxybutynin, propiverine and terazosin.
CONCLUSIONS: dutasteride, fesoterodine and finasteride were classified as beneficial in older persons or frail elderly people (FORTA B). For most drugs, in particular those from the group of α-blockers and antimuscarinics, use in this group seems questionable (FORTA C) or should be avoided (FORTA D).
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Pazan F, Gercke Y, Weiss C, Wehling M; FORTA Raters.
The JAPAN-FORTA (Fit fOR The Aged) list: Consensus validation of a clinical tool to improve drug therapy in older adults.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020 Nov Dec;91:104217. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104217. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
Abstract/Text
PURPOSE: Multimorbidity and subsequent polypharmacy are highly prevalent in older people. To improve inappropriate drug treatment, listing approaches such as the Beers or FORTA lists have been developed. Latter is the only clinically validated drug list issuing both positive (FORTA labels A, B) and negative (FORTA labels C, D) recommendations. Several country-specific FORTA lists have been developed to acknowledge national prescription habits, drug availabilities, and expert opinions. Here, this approach was applied to Japan.
METHODS: 13 Japanese experts in geriatric pharmacotherapy participated as raters in a 2-step Delphi consensus validation of the FORTA list. The proposal of FORTA labels was based on the EURO-FORTA List and raters were asked to add, delete or re-evaluate medications, add relevant diagnoses and comments.
RESULTS: The final JAPAN-FORTA list contains 210 items aligned to 24 main indication groups. 15 items were added to the proposal and the 71 items either not used/approved in Japan or not evaluated by any rater (oncological drugs) were removed. Excluding latter, the JAPAN-FORTA list differs from the EURO-FORTA list by 23 %. Removals mainly concerned psychotropic drugs. A maximum of one label was changed per indication. The majority (96.9 percent) of the proposed FORTA labels were confirmed, only 6 labels had to be changed.
CONCLUSION: The new JAPAN-FORTA list addresses the appropriateness of drug treatment in older people in Japan. This unique listing approach issuing both positive and negative medication recommendations has been shown to improve of drug therapy in older adults and its country-specific version is now available for Japan.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Abrams P, Schulman CC, Vaage S.
Tamsulosin, a selective alpha 1c-adrenoceptor antagonist: a randomized, controlled trial in patients with benign prostatic 'obstruction' (symptomatic BPH). The European Tamsulosin Study Group.
Br J Urol. 1995 Sep;76(3):325-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1995.tb07709.x.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily (as a modified-release formulation) compared with placebo in patients with benign prostatic enlargement, lower urinary tract symptoms and prostatic 'obstruction' (symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia [BPH]).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 313 patients with symptomatic BPH enrolled in a 2-week placebo run-in period, 296 were subsequently randomized to receive either placebo (98 patients) or tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily (198 patients) for 12 weeks. The primary variables assessed to determine efficacy were maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) from free-flow measurements and the total Boyarsky symptom score.
RESULTS: Tamsulosin produced greater improvements in Qmax (1.4 mL/s, 13.1%) than did placebo (0.4 mL/s, 3.8%) (P = 0.028) and a greater decrease in total symptom score (3.4 points, 35.8% reduction) than did placebo (2.2 points, 23.7% reduction) (P = 0.002). Significantly more tamsulosin-treated patients (67%) than placebo-treated patients (44%) had a > or = 25% decrease in total symptom score after 12 weeks (P < 0.001). Treatment with tamsulosin for 12 weeks also produced significant improvements in average urinary flow rate (P = 0.040), irritative (P = 0.013) and obstructive (P = 0.014) symptom scores and symptoms of nocturia (P = 0.022) and hesitancy (P = 0.004). Tamsulosin was tolerated well by the patients. The incidence of adverse events emerging during treatment was comparable in the tamsulosin- and placebo-treated groups (34% and 24% respectively, P = 0.109), as was the incidence of cardiovascular-related adverse events (5% and 7% respectively; P = 0.596). There were no significant differences in changes in blood pressure or pulse rates between the tamsulosin- and placebo-treated groups.
CONCLUSION: Tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily is safe, well tolerated and clinically effective in improving symptoms and urinary flow rate in patients with symptomatic BPH.
Yamaguchi O, Kakizaki H, Homma Y, Takeda M, Nishizawa O, Gotoh M, Yokoyama O, Seki N, Yoshida M; ASSIST Study Group.
Solifenacin as add-on therapy for overactive bladder symptoms in men treated for lower urinary tract symptoms--ASSIST, randomized controlled study.
Urology. 2011 Jul;78(1):126-33. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.02.055. Epub 2011 May 23.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of solifenacin add-on therapy to tamsulosin in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) men with residual overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms despite tamsulosin monotherapy.
METHODS: In this randomized, multicenter, double-blind study, male LUTS patients aged≥50 years with urgency episodes/24 hours≥2 and micturitions/24 hours≥8 were randomized to 3 groups: 12-weeks tamsulosin plus placebo (TAM+PBO), tamsulosin plus solifenacin 2.5 mg (TAM+SOL), and tamsulosin plus solifenacin 5 mg (TAM+SOL). Changes from baseline to end of treatment in the number of urgency episodes/24 hours (primary endpoint), micturitions, nocturia, urgency incontinence episodes, International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS), and Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) were compared between the TAM+SOL groups and TAM+PBO. Safety was assessed on adverse events, postvoid residual volume, and maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax.).
RESULTS: Six-hundred thirty-eight men were randomized. Urgency was reduced by 2.2 and 2.4 episodes in the TAM+SOL 2.5 and 5 mg groups, respectively. The TAM+SOL 5 mg group showed significant improvement compared with TAM+PBO (-2.4 vs -1.9, P=.049). The number of micturitions in both TAM+SOL groups were significantly reduced compared with TAM+PBO (both P<.001). IPSS storage symptom score and OABSS significantly improved in both TAM+SOL groups compared with TAM+PBO. Changes in IPSS voiding symptom score and Qmax. were similar in all groups. Four patients (1.9%) in the TAM+SOL 5 mg group had urinary retention, but all recovered after catheterization.
CONCLUSIONS: In male LUTS patients with residual OAB symptoms despite tamsulosin monotherapy, TAM+SOL showed efficacy on urgency, which represents OAB symptoms and was well tolerated.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Nishizawa O, Yamaguchi O, Takeda M, Yokoyama O; TAABO Study Group.
Randomized Controlled Trial to Treat Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with Overactive Bladder Using an Alpha-blocker Combined with Anticholinergics.
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2011 Apr;3(1):29-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-5672.2010.00081.x. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVES: TAABO was a randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of tamsulosin (TAM) with propiverine (PROP) in men with both benign prostatic hyperplasia and overactive bladder.
METHODS: It enrolled men 50 years or older who had an international prostate symptom score (IPSS) of 8 or higher, an urgency item score of 1 or higher, and a quality of life (QOL) score of 2 or higher. After 8 weeks of TAM 0.2 mg/day, patients who met the inclusion criteria (8 micturitions per 24 h and 1 urgency per 24 h, evaluated by bladder diary) and were eligible for 12-weeks of continued Treatment II. Five hundred and fifteen patients were enrolled. Thereafter, 214 patients were assigned randomly to receive either TAM alone (n = 67), TAM plus PROP 10 mg (n = 72), or TAM plus PROP 20 mg (n = 75) in Treatment II. The primary efficacy end point was a change in micturitions per 24 h documented in the bladder diary. The change from baseline in urgency episodes per 24 h, IPSS, IPSS/QOL subscore, urinary flow rate and postvoid residual volume were assessed as secondary efficacy measures.
RESULTS: A total of 141 men (47 TAM, 49 TAM plus PROP 10 mg, and 45 TAM plus PROP 20 mg patients) were assessed by week 12. Compared with the TAM, TAM plus PROP 10 mg patients experienced significantly fewer micturitions (P = 0.0261), urgencies (P = 0.0093) per 24 h, lower IPSS storage (P = 0.0465), and IPSS urgency (P = 0.0252) subscores.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that combining TAM and 10 mg of PROP for 12 weeks provides added benefit for men with both benign prostatic hyperplasia and overactive bladder.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
Takeda M, Nishizawa O, Gotoh M, Yoshida M, Takahashi S, Masumori N.
Clinical efficacy and safety of imidafenacin as add-on treatment for persistent overactive bladder symptoms despite α-blocker treatment in patients with BPH: the ADDITION study.
Urology. 2013 Oct;82(4):887-93. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of add-on treatment with an anticholinergic (imidafenacin) on persistent overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms despite α-blocker (tamsulosin) treatment in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
METHODS: Patients with BPH ≥50 years old, with urinary urgency at least once per week and total OAB symptom score (OABSS) ≥3 points after ≥8-week treatment with tamsulosin were enrolled in a multicenter, open-label study (not double-blinded). Patients were randomized to receive tamsulosin (0.2 mg/day) alone or tamsulosin (0.2 mg/day) + imidafenacin (0.1 mg 2 times a day). Primary endpoint was 12-week change in OABSS; secondary endpoints were changes in OABSS, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), micturition time chart (MTC), hours of undisturbed sleep (HUS), and quality of life (IPSS-QOL and BPH impact index [BII]). For statistical analysis, a mixed-effects model and t test were used.
RESULTS: In total, 308 men were enrolled. The change from baseline to 12 weeks in total OABSS was significantly greater with add-on imidafenacin than tamsulosin alone (2.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-2.74, P <.0001). Improvements in frequencies of daytime urination, nighttime urination, urinary urgency, urgency incontinence, IPSS, HUS, IPSS-QOL, and BII, were significantly greater from 4 weeks through 12 weeks in the imidafenacin group. Between-group difference in postvoid residual volume at 12 weeks was not significant (-1.74 mL, 95% CI -8.19 to 4.72), and no events of urinary retention were reported.
CONCLUSION: Combined tamsulosin and imidafenacin treatment is effective and safe in patients with BPH with persistent OAB symptoms after tamsulosin monotherapy. Furthermore the combination treatment improved the QOL in BPH patients with OAB.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Yamaguchi O, Uchida E, Higo N, Minami H, Kobayashi S, Sato H; Oxybutynin Patch Study Group.
Efficacy and safety of once-daily oxybutynin patch versus placebo and propiverine in Japanese patients with overactive bladder: A randomized double-blind trial.
Int J Urol. 2014 Jun;21(6):586-93. doi: 10.1111/iju.12372. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily oxybutynin patch therapy for overactive bladder.
METHODS: A randomized double-blind trial was carried out in patients with overactive bladder syndrome, who received an oxybutynin patch, propiverine (20 mg) or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end-point was the change of the mean daily number of micturitions in week 12.
RESULTS: A total of 1530 patients were randomized to receive the oxybutynin patch (573), propiverine (576) or placebo (381). The change of the mean daily frequency of micturition from baseline in the full analysis set was -1.89 ± 2.04 with the oxybutynin patch, which was significantly higher than with placebo (-1.44 ± 2.23) (P = 0.0015). The difference of the mean change in the mean daily number of micturitions between the oxybutynin patch and propiverine groups showed a 95% confidence interval of -0.28 to 0.21, and the upper limit of this interval was below the predefined non-inferiority margin of 0.37, showing non-inferiority of the oxybutynin patch to propiverine. The incidence of dry mouth and constipation was higher with propiverine than with the oxybutynin patch or placebo. Application site dermatitis was more frequent with the oxybutynin patch (31.8%) than with propiverine (5.9%) or placebo (5.2%), but the dermatitis was generally mild.
CONCLUSION: This trial shows the efficacy of the new once-daily oxybutynin patch for overactive bladder. Despite a higher rate of dermatitis with the oxybutynin patch, dry mouth and constipation occurs less often than during treatment with propiverine.
© 2013 The Japanese Urological Association.
Yokoyama O, Yamaguchi A, Yoshida M, Yamanishi T, Ishizuka O, Seki N, Takahashi S, Yamaguchi O, Higo N, Minami H, Masegi Y.
Once-daily oxybutynin patch improves nocturia and sleep quality in Japanese patients with overactive bladder: Post-hoc analysis of a phase III randomized clinical trial.
Int J Urol. 2015 Jul;22(7):684-8. doi: 10.1111/iju.12755. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of a once-daily oxybutynin patch for nocturia, and its influence on sleep quality in patients with overactive bladder.
METHODS: We carried out post-hoc analysis of a phase III, randomized, double-blind, comparative study in which an oxybutynin patch was administered once daily for 12 weeks to Japanese patients with overactive bladder. Patients with a baseline mean of one or more episodes of nocturia per night (data from voiding diaries) were analyzed. The mean number of micturitions, mean voided volume per micturition, mean first voided volume at night, mean sleep duration, and hours of undisturbed sleep were compared between the once-daily oxybutynin patch group and the placebo group. All parameters were expressed as the least squares mean values.
RESULTS: The analysis included 576 patients. The number of nocturia episodes decreased by 0.66 in the oxybutynin patch group versus 0.51 in the placebo group (P = 0.0249). Also, the voided volume per nocturnal micturition and the first voided volume at night showed a significant increase in the oxybutynin patch group compared with the placebo group (P = 0.0073 and P = 0.0005, respectively). The hours of undisturbed sleep showed significant prolongation by 76.14 min in the oxybutynin patch group versus 56.07 min in the placebo group (P = 0.0257).
CONCLUSIONS: Oxybutynin patch treatment reduces the number of nocturia episodes and prolongs the hours of undisturbed sleep, thus improving sleep quality and sleep-related quality of life in patients with overactive bladder.
© 2015 The Japanese Urological Association.
Herbison P, McKenzie JE.
Which anticholinergic is best for people with overactive bladders? A network meta-analysis.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Feb;38(2):525-534. doi: 10.1002/nau.23893. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
Abstract/Text
AIM: To carry out a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anticholinergic drug treatment for people with overactive bladders.
METHODS: Comprehensive searches for relevant RCTs were carried out starting with RCTs included in previous systematic reviews with the last search in February 2017. Searches included terms for the anticholinergic drugs tolterodine, oxybutynin, trospium, propiverine, solifenacin, darifenacin, imidafenacin, and fesoterodine. Data was extracted from the systematic reviews or reports of studies for cure or improvement, voids per 24 hr, leakage episodes per 24 hr and dry mouth. Data was analysed using frequentist network meta-analysis.
RESULTS: 128 studies were found. There was no clearly best treatment for cure or improvement. The differences between treatments for voids and leakages were small and unlikely to be of clinical importance. Transdermally delivered oxybutynin was clearly the best treatment for dry mouth but was still worse than placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: All the anticholinergic drugs were better than placebo but apart from dry mouth were similar in effect. Transdermal oxybutynin caused less dry mouth than the other treatments, so may be worth considering as the first treatment.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Yamaguchi O, Marui E, Kakizaki H, Homma Y, Igawa Y, Takeda M, Nishizawa O, Gotoh M, Yoshida M, Yokoyama O, Seki N, Ikeda Y, Ohkawa S.
Phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the β3-adrenoceptor agonist mirabegron, 50 mg once daily, in Japanese patients with overactive bladder.
BJU Int. 2014 Jun;113(6):951-60. doi: 10.1111/bju.12649. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the β3-adrenoceptor agonist mirabegron, in a Japanese population with overactive bladder (OAB).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study enrolled adult patients experiencing OAB symptoms for ≥24 weeks. Patients with ≥ 8 micturitions/24 h and ≥1 urgency episode/24 h or ≥1 urgency incontinence episode/24 h were randomised to once-daily placebo, mirabegron 50 mg or tolterodine 4 mg (as an active comparator, without testing for non-inferiority of efficacy and safety) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in the mean number of micturitions/24 h from baseline to final assessment. Secondary endpoints included micturition variables related to urgency and/or incontinence and quality-of-life domain scores on the King's Health Questionnaire. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), post-void residual urine volume, laboratory variables, vital signs and 12-lead electrocardiogram.
RESULTS: A total of 1139 patients were randomised to receive placebo (n = 381), mirabegron 50 mg (n = 380) or tolterodine 4 mg (n = 378). Demographic and baseline characteristics were similar among the treatment groups. At final assessment, mirabegron was significantly superior to placebo in terms of mean [sd] change from baseline in number of micturitions/24 h (-1.67 [2.212] vs -0.86 [2.354]; P < 0.001) and mean [sd] change from baseline in number of urgency episodes/24 h (-1.85 [2.555] vs -1.37 [3.191]; P = 0.025), incontinence episodes/24 h (-1.12 [1.475] vs -0.66 [1.861]; P = 0.003), urgency incontinence episodes/24 h (-1.01 [1.338] vs -0.60 [1.745]; P = 0.008), and volume voided/micturition (24.300 [35.4767] vs 9.715 [29.0864] mL; P < 0.001). The incidence of AEs in the mirabegron group was similar to that in the placebo group. Most AEs were mild and none were severe.
CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron 50 mg once daily is an effective treatment for OAB symptoms, with a low occurrence of side effects in a Japanese population.
© 2014 The Authors. BJU International © 2014 BJU International.
Hoffman V, Hallas J, Linder M, Margulis AV, Suehs BT, Arana A, Phiri K, Enger C, Horter L, Odsbu I, Olesen M, Perez-Gutthann S, Xu Y, Kristiansen NS, Appenteng K, de Vogel S, Seeger JD; mirabegron PMR-PASS study group.
Cardiovascular Risk in Users of Mirabegron Compared with Users of Antimuscarinic Treatments for Overactive Bladder: Findings from a Non-Interventional, Multinational, Cohort Study.
Drug Saf. 2021 Aug;44(8):899-915. doi: 10.1007/s40264-021-01095-7. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
Abstract/Text
INTRODUCTION: During clinical trials, mirabegron, a β3-adrenoreceptor agonist, was associated with increased vital signs vs placebo in patients with overactive bladder.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare incidence rates of adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes following mirabegron or antimuscarinic use.
METHODS: We conducted an observational post-marketing safety study utilising real-world data. The study population was identified within five sources: Danish and Swedish National Registers, Clinical Practice Research Datalink (UK), Optum (USA) and Humana (USA). Episodes of time when patients were new users of mirabegron or antimuscarinics (October 2012-December 2018) were sourced from prescriptions and matched on propensity scores. Occurrences of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, CV mortality and all-cause mortality were identified. Outcome incidence rates and hazard ratios from Cox models were estimated.
RESULTS: Overall, 152,026 mirabegron and 152,026 antimuscarinic episodes were matched. The population consisted of 63.1% women and 72.6% were ≥ 65 years old. There were no appreciable differences in the incidence rates of MACE, AMI or stroke between users of mirabegron and antimuscarinics. Incidence rates of CV mortality (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.73-0.95) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.76-0.84) were no higher with mirabegron vs antimuscarinics. Results restricted to episodes at high risk for CV events or stratified by age (< 65 years, ≥ 65 years) or prior overactive bladder medication use were consistent with overall findings.
CONCLUSIONS: This large, multinational study found no higher risk of MACE, AMI, stroke, CV mortality or all-cause mortality among users of mirabegron relative to users of antimuscarinics.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Wagg A, Staskin D, Engel E, Herschorn S, Kristy RM, Schermer CR.
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of mirabegron in patients aged ≥65yr with overactive bladder wet: a phase IV, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study (PILLAR).
Eur Urol. 2020 Feb;77(2):211-220. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
Abstract/Text
BACKGROUND: The majority of patients with overactive bladder (OAB) are aged >65yr. There has been no prospectively designed study assessing treatment efficacy with the β3-adrenoreceptor agonist, mirabegron, specifically in this age group.
OBJECTIVE: A phase IV study comparing flexibly dosed mirabegron versus placebo in elderly patients with OAB and urgency incontinence.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling patients aged ≥65yr with OAB for ≥3mo.
INTERVENTION: Following a 2-wk placebo run in, patients with one or more incontinence episodes, three or more urgency episodes, and an average of eight or more micturitions/24h were randomised 1:1 to double-blind 25mg/d mirabegron or matched placebo, for 12wk. After week 4 or 8, the dose could be increased to 50mg/d mirabegron/matched placebo based on patient and investigator discretion.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Coprimary endpoints: change from baseline to end of treatment (EOT) in the mean numbers of micturitions/24h and incontinence episodes/24h. Secondary endpoints: change from baseline to EOT in the mean volume voided/micturition, mean number of urgency episodes/24h, and mean number of urgency incontinence episodes/24h. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used for the mean number of micturitions/24h, mean volume voided/micturition, and mean number of urgency episodes/24h. Stratified rank ANCOVA was used for the mean numbers of incontinence episodes/24h and urgency incontinence episodes/24h.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Statistically significant improvements were observed for mirabegron versus placebo in change from baseline to EOT in the mean number of micturitions/24h, mean number of incontinence episodes/24h, mean volume voided/micturition, mean number of urgency episodes/24h, and mean number of urgency incontinence episodes/24h. Safety and tolerability were consistent with the known mirabegron safety profile.
CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron efficacy, safety, and tolerability over 12 wk were confirmed in patients aged ≥65yr with OAB and incontinence.
PATIENT SUMMARY: We examined the effect of mirabegron compared with placebo in people aged 65yr or older with overactive bladder and incontinence. Mirabegron improved the symptoms of overactive bladder compared with placebo. Side effects were similar to those already known for mirabegron.
Copyright © 2019 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Griebling TL, Campbell NL, Mangel J, Staskin D, Herschorn S, Elsouda D, Schermer CR.
Effect of mirabegron on cognitive function in elderly patients with overactive bladder: MoCA results from a phase 4 randomized, placebo-controlled study (PILLAR).
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Mar 18;20(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-1474-7. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
Abstract/Text
BACKGROUND: Antimuscarinics are often used for treatment of overactive bladder (OAB), but exposure to medications such as antimuscarinics that have anticholinergic properties has been linked to adverse cognitive effects. A phase 4 placebo-controlled study (PILLAR; NCT02216214) described the efficacy and safety of mirabegron, a β3-adrenoreceptor agonist, for treatment of wet OAB in patients aged ≥65 years. This pre-planned analysis aimed to measure differences in cognitive function between mirabegron and placebo, using a rapid screening instrument for mild cognitive impairment: the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).
METHODS: Outpatients aged ≥65 years with wet OAB were randomized 1:1 to mirabegron or placebo, stratified by age (<75/≥75 years). There were no exclusion criteria regarding cognitive status. Patients randomized to mirabegron initially received 25 mg/day with an optional increase to 50 mg/day after week 4/8 based on patient/investigator discretion. The MoCA was administered at baseline and end of treatment (EoT, week 12). The study protocol was Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board-approved.
RESULTS: Of the 887 randomized patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug, 72.3% were female, 79.5% were white, and 28.1% were aged ≥75 years. All patients had ≥1 comorbidity and 94.3% were receiving ≥1 concomitant medication. One third of patients had a history of psychiatric disorders, the most common being depression (17.2%), insomnia (15.7%), and anxiety (11.4%). Baseline mean (standard error, SE) MoCA total scores were 26.9 (0.1) and 26.8 (0.1) in the mirabegron and placebo groups, respectively. Among patients with MoCA data available at baseline/EoT, 27.1% (115/425) and 25.8% (106/411) of mirabegron and placebo group patients, respectively, had impaired cognitive function at baseline (MoCA total score <26). There was no statistically significant change in adjusted mean (SE) MoCA total score from baseline to EoT in the mirabegron group (-0.2 [0.1]) or the placebo group (-0.1 [0.1]).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with mirabegron for 12 weeks did not contribute to drug-related cognitive side effects in patients aged ≥65 years, as measured by the MoCA. Furthermore, the pattern of change in cognition over time in an older OAB trial population does not appear to differ from that of subjects receiving placebo.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02216214 (prospectively registered August 13, 2014).
Yoshida M, Takeda M, Gotoh M, Nagai S, Kurose T.
Vibegron, a Novel Potent and Selective β3-Adrenoreceptor Agonist, for the Treatment of Patients with Overactive Bladder: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Study.
Eur Urol. 2018 May;73(5):783-790. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.12.022. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
Abstract/Text
BACKGROUND: Vibegron is a novel, potent, and selective β3-adrenoreceptor agonist for the treatment of patients with overactive bladder (OAB).
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vibegron versus placebo in Japanese OAB patients.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with OAB entered a 2-wk placebo run-in phase. Once eligibility (≥8 micturition/d and either ≥1 urgency episodes/d or ≥1 urgency incontinence episodes/d) was confirmed, patients entered a 12-wk double-blind treatment phase. The anticholinergic imidafenacin was used as an active reference.
INTERVENTION: A total of 1232 patients were randomly assigned to one of the four 12-wk treatment groups: vibegron (50mg or 100mg once daily), placebo, or imidafenacin (0.1mg twice daily).
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was change in the mean number of micturitions/d at wk 12 from baseline. The secondary endpoints were changes from baselines in OAB symptom variables (daily episodes of urgency, urgency incontinence, incontinence, and nocturia, and voided volume/micturition). Quality of life (QoL) and safety were assessed. A constrained longitudinal data analysis model was used for analysis of efficacy.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Patients taking vibegron 50mg and 100mg orally for 12 wk had significant improvements over the placebo in the primary and secondary endpoints. The proportions of patients with normalization of micturition, resolution of urgency, urgency incontinence, and incontinence were significantly greater than placebo. Vibegron significantly improved QoL, with high patient satisfaction. Incidences of drug-related adverse events with vibegron 50mg and 100mg were 7.6%, 5.4%, similar to placebo (5.1%), and less than imidafenacin (10.3%). Treatment was for just 12 wk and a long-term study is needed.
CONCLUSIONS: The 12-wk treatment with vibegron is effective and well tolerated in patients with OAB.
PATIENT SUMMARY: This randomized study demonstrated that vibegron is clinically useful for treatment of patients with OAB. Trial registration JapicCTI-152936. http://www.clinicaltrials.jp/user/cteDetail.jsp.
Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Yoshida M, Takeda M, Gotoh M, Yokoyama O, Kakizaki H, Takahashi S, Masumori N, Nagai S, Minemura K.
Efficacy of vibegron, a novel β3-adrenoreceptor agonist, on severe urgency urinary incontinence related to overactive bladder: post hoc analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, comparative phase 3 study.
BJU Int. 2020 May;125(5):709-717. doi: 10.1111/bju.15020. Epub 2020 Feb 23.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a novel and selective β3-adrenoreceptor agonist vibegron on urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) in patients with overactive bladder (OAB).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A post hoc analysis was performed in patients with UUI (>0 episodes/day) who were assigned to receive vibegron or placebo in a vibegron phase 3 study. Patients were subclassified into mild/moderate (>0 to <3 UUI episodes/day) or severe UUI (≥3 UUI episodes/day) subgroup. Changes from baseline in number of UUI episodes/day, in number of urgency episodes/day, and in voided volume/micturition were compared between the groups. The percentage of patients who became UUI-free ('diary-dry' rate) and the response rate (percentage of patients with scores 1 [feeling much better] or 2 [feeling better] assessed by the Patient Global Impression scale [PGI]) were evaluated.
RESULTS: Changes in numbers of UUI episodes at week 12 in the vibegron 50 mg, vibegron 100 mg and placebo groups, respectively, were -1.35, -1.47 and -1.08 in all patients, -1.04, -1.13 and -0.89 in the mild/moderate UUI subgroup, and -2.95, -3.28 and -2.10 in the severe UUI subgroup. The changes were significant in the vibegron 50 and 100 mg groups vs placebo regardless of symptom severity. Change in number of urgency episodes/day was significant in the vibegron 100 mg group vs placebo in all patients and in both severity subgroups. In the vibegron 50 mg group, a significant change vs placebo was observed in all patients and in the mild/moderate UUI subgroup. Change in voided volume/micturition was significantly greater in the vibegron 50 and 100 mg groups vs placebo in all patients, as well as in the both severity subgroups. Diary-dry rates in the vibegron 50 and 100 mg groups were significantly greater vs placebo in all patients and in the mild/moderate UUI subgroup. In the severe UUI subgroup, however, a significant difference was observed only in the vibegron 50 mg group. Response rates assessed by the PGI were significantly higher in the vibegron groups vs placebo in all patients and in the both severity subgroups. Vibegron administration, OAB duration ≤37 months, mean number of micturitions/day at baseline <12.0 and mean number of UUI episodes/day at baseline <3.0 were identified as factors significantly associated with normalization of UUI.
CONCLUSIONS: Vibegron, a novel β3-adrenoreceptor agonist, significantly reduced the number of UUI episodes/day and significantly increased the voided volume/micturition in patients with OAB including those with severe UUI, with the response rate exceeding 50%. These results suggest that vibegron can be an effective therapeutic option for OAB patients with UUI.
© 2020 The Authors BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International.
Yoshida M, Takeda M, Gotoh M, Yokoyama O, Kakizaki H, Takahashi S, Masumori N, Nagai S, Hashimoto K, Minemura K.
Efficacy of novel β3 -adrenoreceptor agonist vibegron on nocturia in patients with overactive bladder: A post-hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study.
Int J Urol. 2019 Mar;26(3):369-375. doi: 10.1111/iju.13877. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of vibegron on nocturia in patients with overactive bladder.
METHODS: Among the Japanese overactive bladder patients enrolled in the placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase 3 study of vibegron, a total of 669 patients with nocturia (≥1 nocturnal void) were included. Changes from baseline in micturition parameters were compared for vibegron treatment (50 and 100 mg/day) versus placebo. Correlations of hours of undisturbed sleep with the frequency of nocturnal voiding and the volume of the first nocturnal voiding were examined. Demographics and baseline characteristics contributing to reduction in the frequency of nocturnal voiding were also analyzed.
RESULTS: At week 12, the frequency of nocturnal voiding was reduced from baseline by 0.74 and 0.78, respectively, for the vibegron 50 and 100 mg groups; the reductions were significant when compared with the placebo group (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively). The mean volume of nocturnal voids and the volume of the first nocturnal voiding were significantly greater in the vibegron groups than in the placebo group. The vibegron groups showed significant correlations of hours of undisturbed sleep with the changes in the frequency of nocturnal voiding and in the volume of the first nocturnal voiding. Vibegron treatment, no previous treatment with anticholinergics, ≥12 voids per day and hours of undisturbed sleep <180 min significantly contributed to a reduction in the frequency of nocturnal voiding.
CONCLUSIONS: Vibegron is a useful therapeutic option for improving nocturia in patients with overactive bladder.
© 2018 The Japanese Urological Association.
Yoshida M, Takeda M, Gotoh M, Yokoyama O, Kakizaki H, Takahashi S, Masumori N, Nagai S, Minemura K.
Cardiovascular safety of vibegron, a new β3-adrenoceptor agonist, in older patients with overactive bladder: Post-hoc analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind comparative phase 3 study.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2021 Aug;40(6):1651-1660. doi: 10.1002/nau.24732. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
Abstract/Text
AIMS: To examine the safety and efficacy of vibegron, a new β3-adrenoceptor agonist, in patients aged ≥65 years, with a focus on the effects on cardiovascular system and overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms.
METHODS: A post-hoc subgroup analysis was performed of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind comparative phase 3 study of vibegron, including those assigned to receive either vibegron 50 mg (V50), vibegron 100 mg (V100), or placebo for 12 weeks. Subjects were stratified into two subgroups based on age: a <65-year subgroup and a ≥65-year subgroup. Safety (changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, and residual urine volume) and efficacy (changes in the numbers of micturitions, urgency episodes, urgency urinary incontinence [UUI] episodes, and the voided volume/micturition) were assessed in the subgroups treated with vibegron vs. placebo.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the cardiovascular outcomes (blood pressure and pulse rate), nor in the changes in residual urine volume, between the V50/100 and placebo groups in the <65-year or ≥65-year subgroup after 12-week treatment. Adverse events were slightly increased in the ≥65-year subgroup. In the efficacy analysis, V50/100 demonstrated similar efficacy in the <65-year and ≥65-year subgroups; an increasing trend in the voided volume/micturition was observed in subjects aged ≥65 years compared to subjects aged <65 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Vibegron was suggested to be similarly effective in patients ≥65 and <65 years and to have minimal influence on cardiovascular parameters.
© 2021 The Authors. Neurourology and Urodynamics Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Yamaguchi O, Kakizaki H, Homma Y, Igawa Y, Takeda M, Nishizawa O, Gotoh M, Yoshida M, Yokoyama O, Seki N, Okitsu A, Hamada T, Kobayashi A, Kuroishi K.
Long-term safety and efficacy of antimuscarinic add-on therapy in patients with overactive bladder who had a suboptimal response to mirabegron monotherapy: A multicenter, randomized study in Japan (MILAI II study).
Int J Urol. 2019 Mar;26(3):342-352. doi: 10.1111/iju.13868. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term safety (primary objective) and efficacy (secondary objective) of antimuscarinic add-on therapy in patients receiving mirabegron.
METHODS: During a 2-week screening period, patients (aged ≥20 years, mirabegron treatment for ≥6 weeks, residual overactive bladder symptoms) received mirabegron 50 mg once daily. These patients were subsequently randomized to 52 weeks' treatment with mirabegron 50 mg/day plus an antimuscarinic (solifenacin 5 mg, propiverine 20 mg, imidafenacin 0.2 mg, or tolterodine 4 mg) with the potential to double the antimuscarinic dose (except for tolterodine) at week 8. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiograms, post-void residual volume, and laboratory evaluations. Efficacy was assessed using changes from baseline in overactive bladder symptom score total score; overactive bladder questionnaire short form score; micturitions, urgency episodes, urinary incontinence episodes, and urgency urinary incontinence episodes/24 h; mean volume voided per micturition; and number of night-time micturitions.
RESULTS: Overall, 80.2% of patients (88.1% women, mean age 65 years) experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event, with similar rates for all treatments. The adverse events most commonly reported were dry mouth, nasopharyngitis, and constipation. No marked change was observed in systolic or diastolic blood pressure for any treatment, although pulse rate increased slightly in the mirabegron and propiverine, and mirabegron and tolterodine groups. For all treatments, significant improvements were observed in all efficacy parameters, including overactive bladder symptom score total and questionnaire short form scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Antimuscarinic add-on therapy is well tolerated and effective after initial treatment with mirabegron in patients with overactive bladder symptoms.
© 2018 The Authors. International Journal of Urology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Urological Association.
Yokoyama O, Honda M, Yamanishi T, Sekiguchi Y, Fujii K, Nakayama T, Mogi T.
OnabotulinumtoxinA (botulinum toxin type A) for the treatment of Japanese patients with overactive bladder and urinary incontinence: Results of single-dose treatment from a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (interim analysis).
Int J Urol. 2020 Mar;27(3):227-234. doi: 10.1111/iju.14176. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA (botulinum toxin type A) 100 U in patients with overactive bladder and urinary incontinence.
METHODS: This was a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Japanese patients who were inadequately managed with overactive bladder medications (anticholinergics and/or β3 -adrenergic receptor agonists). Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive a single dose of either onabotulinumtoxinA or placebo into the detrusor muscle (n = 124 each). The primary end-point was the change in the number of daily urinary incontinence episodes at week 12 from baseline. Secondary end-points included volume voided per micturition, other symptomatic measures (urinary urgency incontinence, micturition, urgency and nocturia) and patient-reported outcomes.
RESULTS: In the onabotulinumtoxinA group, there was a significantly greater decrease from baseline in the mean number of daily urinary incontinence episodes compared with the placebo group (2.16; P < 0.001), and significantly greater improvement for all secondary end-points (P < 0.05). Urinary tract infection, dysuria, urinary retention and post-void residual urine volume increased represented adverse events occurring at a higher rate in the onabotulinumtoxinA group. The majority of these were mild or moderate in severity.
CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in symptoms and patient-reported outcomes, and tolerability were seen in patients with overactive bladder and urinary incontinence who had been inadequately managed with overactive bladder medications after using onabotulinumtoxinA.
© 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Urology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Urological Association.
Honda M, Yokoyama O, Takahashi R, Matsuda T, Nakayama T, Mogi T.
Botulinum toxin injections for Japanese patients with urinary incontinence caused by neurogenic detrusor overactivity: Clinical evaluation of onabotulinumtoxinA in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial with an open-label extension.
Int J Urol. 2021 Sep;28(9):906-912. doi: 10.1111/iju.14602. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin treatment (onabotulinumtoxinA 200 units) for Japanese patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity caused by spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis.
METHODS: Patients with urinary incontinence refractory to pharmacological treatment were enrolled and randomized in a phase III trial. A single dose of onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 11) or placebo (n = 10) was given in the double-blind phase, and repeat injections of onabotulinumtoxinA were given in the subsequent open-label phase. Outcomes included urinary incontinence episodes, urodynamics, patient-reported outcomes and adverse events.
RESULTS: The onabotulinumtoxinA group showed a numerically greater reduction in the number of urinary incontinence episodes per day than the placebo group, with the difference between the groups at week 6 of -3.02 (95% confidence interval -5.85 to -0.19). The onabotulinumtoxinA group also showed greater improvements in urodynamic assessments. Adverse events related to onabotulinumtoxinA injections were hematuria, urinary retention, urinary bladder hemorrhage, autonomic dysreflexia and epididymitis. Most events were deemed mild or moderate.
CONCLUSIONS: Intradetrusor injections of onabotulinumtoxinA are efficacious and tolerable for Japanese patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity-related symptoms that are difficult to manage with anticholinergics and/or β3 -adrenergic receptor agonists.
© 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Urology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Urological Association.
Siegel S, Noblett K, Mangel J, Griebling TL, Sutherland SE, Bird ET, Comiter C, Culkin D, Bennett J, Zylstra S, Berg KC, Kan F, Irwin CP.
Results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter study evaluating sacral neuromodulation with InterStim therapy compared to standard medical therapy at 6-months in subjects with mild symptoms of overactive bladder.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Mar;34(3):224-30. doi: 10.1002/nau.22544. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
Abstract/Text
AIMS: This prospective, randomized, multicenter trial evaluated the 6-month success rate of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) with InterStim® Therapy versus standard medical therapy (SMT) for overactive bladder (OAB).
METHODS: Enrolled subjects discontinued OAB medications prior to and during baseline data collection and were randomized 1:1 to SNM or SMT. Subjects had bothersome symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) including urinary urge incontinence (≥2 leaks/72 hr) and/or urgency-frequency (≥8 voids/day). Subjects failed at least one anticholinergic medication, and had at least one medication not yet attempted. The primary objective was to compare OAB therapeutic success rate at 6 months between SNM and SMT.
RESULTS: Overall, 147 subjects were randomized (70 to SNM and 77 to SMT); 93% were female and mean age was 58. The primary intent to treat analysis showed OAB therapeutic success was significantly greater in the SNM group (61%) than the SMT group (42%; P = 0.02). In the as treated analysis, OAB therapeutic success was 76% for SNM and 49% for SMT (P = 0.002). The SNM group showed significant improvements in quality of life versus the SMT group (all P < 0.001) and 86% of SNM subjects reported improved or greatly improved urinary symptom interference score at 6 months, compared to 44% for SMT subjects. The device-related adverse event rate was 30.5% and the medication-related adverse event rate was 27.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates superior objective and subjective success of SNM compared to SMT. SNM is shown to be a safe and effective treatment for OAB patients with mild to moderate symptoms. Neurourol. Urodynam. 34:224-230, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Amundsen CL, Richter HE, Menefee SA, Komesu YM, Arya LA, Gregory WT, Myers DL, Zyczynski HM, Vasavada S, Nolen TL, Wallace D, Meikle SF.
OnabotulinumtoxinA vs Sacral Neuromodulation on Refractory Urgency Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA. 2016 Oct 4;316(13):1366-1374. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14617.
Abstract/Text
IMPORTANCE: Women with refractory urgency urinary incontinence are treated with sacral neuromodulation and onabotulinumtoxinA with limited comparative information.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether onabotulinumtoxinA is superior to sacral neuromodulation in controlling refractory episodes of urgency urinary incontinence.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter open-label randomized trial (February 2012-January 2015) at 9 US medical centers involving 381 women with refractory urgency urinary incontinence.
INTERVENTIONS: Cystoscopic intradetrusor injection of 200 U of onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 192) or sacral neuromodulation (n = 189).
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcome, change from baseline mean number of daily urgency urinary incontinence episodes over 6 months, was measured with monthly 3-day diaries. Secondary outcomes included change from baseline in urinary symptom scores in the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (SF); range, 0-100, higher scores indicating worse symptoms; Overactive Bladder Satisfaction questionnaire; range, 0-100; includes 5 subscales, higher scores indicating better satisfaction; and adverse events.
RESULTS: Of the 364 women (mean [SD] age, 63.0 [11.6] years) in the intention-to-treat population, 190 women in the onabotulinumtoxinA group had a greater reduction in 6-month mean number of episodes of urgency incontinence per day than did the 174 in the sacral neuromodulation group (-3.9 vs -3.3 episodes per day; mean difference, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.13 to 1.14; P = .01). Participants treated with onabotulinumtoxinA showed greater improvement in the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire SF for symptom bother (-46.7 vs -38.6; mean difference, 8.1; 95% CI, 3.0 to 13.3; P = .002); treatment satisfaction (67.7 vs 59.8; mean difference, 7.8; 95% CI, 1.6 to 14.1; P = .01) and treatment endorsement (78.1 vs 67.6; mean difference; 10.4, 95% CI, 4.3 to 16.5; P < .001) than treatment with sacral neuromodulation. There were no differences in convenience (67.6 vs 70.2; mean difference, -2.5; 95% CI, -8.1 to 3.0; P = .36), adverse effects (88.4 vs 85.1; mean difference, 3.3; 95% CI, -1.9 to 8.5; P = .22), and treatment preference (92.% vs 89%; risk difference, -3%; 95% CI, -16% to 10%; P = .49). Urinary tract infections were more frequent in the onabotulinumtoxinA group (35% vs 11%; risk difference, -23%; 95% CI, -33% to -13%; P < .001). The need for self-catheterization was 8% and 2% at 1 and 6 months in the onabotulinumtoxinA group. Neuromodulation device revisions and removals occurred in 3%.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among women with refractory urgency urinary incontinence, treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA compared with sacral neuromodulation resulted in a small daily improvement in episodes that although statistically significant is of uncertain clinical importance. In addition, it resulted in a higher risk of urinary tract infections and need for transient self-catheterizations.
Amundsen CL, Komesu YM, Chermansky C, Gregory WT, Myers DL, Honeycutt EF, Vasavada SP, Nguyen JN, Wilson TS, Harvie HS, Wallace D; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
Two-Year Outcomes of Sacral Neuromodulation Versus OnabotulinumtoxinA for Refractory Urgency Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Trial.
Eur Urol. 2018 Jul;74(1):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
Abstract/Text
BACKGROUND: Urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) is a chronic condition for which sacral neuromodulation (SNM) (InterStim/Medtronic) and onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX) (BotoxA/Allergan) are utilized. These therapies have not been compared over extended time.
OBJECTIVE: To compare UUI episodes (UUIE) over 24 mo following SNM or BTX.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter, open-label, randomized, extension trial (February 2012-July 2016) at nine US medical centers involving 386 women with ≥6 UUIE over 3 d inadequately managed by medications. Participants were clinical responders to treatment: ≥50% reduction in UUIEs after SNM placement or 1 mo post BTX.
INTERVENTION: SNM (n=194) versus 200 U BTX (n=192). SNM reprogrammings occurred throughout the 24 mo. After 6 mo, two additional BTX injections were allowed.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary outcome: change in mean daily UUIE over 24 mo.
SECONDARY OUTCOMES: no UUIE, ≥75% and ≥50% UUIE reduction; Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form; Urinary Distress Inventory short form; Incontinence Impact Questionnaire; Patient Global Impression of Improvement; Overactive Bladder Satisfaction of Treatment Questionnaire; and adverse events (AEs). Primary analysis used a linear mixed model.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Outcome data were available for 260/298 (87%) clinical responders. No difference in decreased mean UUIE was found over 24 mo (-3.88 vs -3.50 episodes/d,95% confidence interval [CI]=-0.14-0.89; p=0.15), with no differences in UUI resolution, ≥75% or ≥50% UUIE reduction. BTX group maintained higher satisfaction (mean difference=-9.14, 95% CI=-14.38--3.90; p<0.001), treatment endorsement (mean difference=-12.16, 95% CI=-17.7--6.63; p<0.001) through 24 mo. Other secondary measures did not differ. Recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) were higher after BTX (24% vs 10%; p<0.01), 6% required intermittent catheterization post second injection. SNM revision and removals occurred in 3% and 9% patients, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Both treatments offered sustainable UUI improvement, and higher BTX dosing had low clean intermittent catheterization rates, but with UTI risk. SNM revision/removal rates were low due to standardized lead placement with strict treatment response definitions.
PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared a large group of US women with severe urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) who received sacral neuromodulation (InterStim) or onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox A) therapy during a 2-yr period. We found that both therapies had similar success in reducing UUI symptoms, and adverse events were low. However, women in the BotoxA group had higher satisfaction and endorsement with their treatment, but with a higher chance of a urinary tract infection. We conclude that both therapies offer sustained reduction in daily incontinence over 2 yr.
Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Kakizaki H, Lee KS, Yamamoto O, Jong JJ, Katou D, Sumarsono B, Uno S, Yamaguchi O.
Mirabegron Add-on Therapy to Tamsulosin for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study (MATCH).
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Jul 15;6(4):729-737. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.10.019. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
Abstract/Text
BACKGROUND: Men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) treated with α-blockers (eg, tamsulosin) may experience overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms and receive add-on antimuscarinics. Mirabegron (a β3-adrenoreceptor agonist) is an alternative add-on therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of mirabegron versus placebo in men with OAB symptoms receiving tamsulosin for LUTS.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Japanese and Korean men with OAB treated with tamsulosin for LUTS (January 2016-July 2017).
INTERVENTION: Single-blind, 4-wk screening: tamsulosin plus placebo orally once daily; double-blind, 12-wk treatment: patients randomized (n=568) to mirabegron 50mg or placebo, as add-on to tamsulosin.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary endpoint: baseline to end of treatment (EoT) change in the mean number of micturitions/24h, based on a 3-d voiding diary. Secondary endpoints: change in other diary variables and patient-reported outcomes from baseline to EoT. The primary endpoint was analyzed by analysis of covariance, including treatment group and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Mirabegron add-on therapy was superior to placebo in improving the primary endpoint (adjusted mean difference [95% confidence interval] vs placebo -0.52 [-0.82 to -0.21]) and secondary endpoints, including mean volume voided/micturition (12.08 [6.33-17.84]), OAB symptom score (-0.65 [-1.04 to -0.26]), International Prostate Symptom Score total (-1.19 [-1.94 to -0.44]), storage (-0.78 [-1.13 to -0.43]), quality of life scores (-0.29 [-0.51 to -0.07]), OAB symptom bother (-4.52 [-6.91 to -2.13]), and total health-related quality of life (2.79 [1.13 to 4.44]). Differences, compared with placebo, in urgency, urgency urinary incontinence, and nocturia were not statistically significant. Mirabegron was well tolerated, with no major safety concerns. Limitations included a lack of antimuscarinic comparison.
CONCLUSIONS: The mirabegron add-on therapy to tamsulosin for 12 wk in men with LUTS and OAB symptoms demonstrated superior efficacy to placebo and was well tolerated.
PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at the efficacy and safety of mirabegron compared with placebo in men being treated with tamsulosin but who still had overactive bladder symptoms. Mirabegron improved overactive bladder symptoms and patient-reported outcomes compared with placebo, and was well tolerated.
Copyright © 2019 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
