| |
著者: Mark B Faries, John F Thompson, Alistair J Cochran, Robert H Andtbacka, Nicola Mozzillo, Jonathan S Zager, Tiina Jahkola, Tawnya L Bowles, Alessandro Testori, Peter D Beitsch, Harald J Hoekstra, Marc Moncrieff, Christian Ingvar, Michel W J M Wouters, Michael S Sabel, Edward A Levine, Doreen Agnese, Michael Henderson, Reinhard Dummer, Carlo R Rossi, Rogerio I Neves, Steven D Trocha, Frances Wright, David R Byrd, Maurice Matter, Eddy Hsueh, Alastair MacKenzie-Ross, Douglas B Johnson, Patrick Terheyden, Adam C Berger, Tara L Huston, Jeffrey D Wayne, B Mark Smithers, Heather B Neuman, Schlomo Schneebaum, Jeffrey E Gershenwald, Charlotte E Ariyan, Darius C Desai, Lisa Jacobs, Kelly M McMasters, Anja Gesierich, Peter Hersey, Steven D Bines, John M Kane, Richard J Barth, Gregory McKinnon, Jeffrey M Farma, Erwin Schultz, Sergi Vidal-Sicart, Richard A Hoefer, James M Lewis, Randall Scheri, Mark C Kelley, Omgo E Nieweg, R Dirk Noyes, Dave S B Hoon, He-Jing Wang, David A Elashoff, Robert M Elashoff
雑誌名: N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2211-2222. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613210.
Abstract/Text
BACKGROUND: Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy is associated with increased melanoma-specific survival (i.e., survival until death from melanoma) among patients with node-positive intermediate-thickness melanomas (1.2 to 3.5 mm). The value of completion lymph-node dissection for patients with sentinel-node metastases is not clear.
METHODS: In an international trial, we randomly assigned patients with sentinel-node metastases detected by means of standard pathological assessment or a multimarker molecular assay to immediate completion lymph-node dissection (dissection group) or nodal observation with ultrasonography (observation group). The primary end point was melanoma-specific survival. Secondary end points included disease-free survival and the cumulative rate of nonsentinel-node metastasis.
RESULTS: Immediate completion lymph-node dissection was not associated with increased melanoma-specific survival among 1934 patients with data that could be evaluated in an intention-to-treat analysis or among 1755 patients in the per-protocol analysis. In the per-protocol analysis, the mean (±SE) 3-year rate of melanoma-specific survival was similar in the dissection group and the observation group (86±1.3% and 86±1.2%, respectively; P=0.42 by the log-rank test) at a median follow-up of 43 months. The rate of disease-free survival was slightly higher in the dissection group than in the observation group (68±1.7% and 63±1.7%, respectively; P=0.05 by the log-rank test) at 3 years, based on an increased rate of disease control in the regional nodes at 3 years (92±1.0% vs. 77±1.5%; P<0.001 by the log-rank test); these results must be interpreted with caution. Nonsentinel-node metastases, identified in 11.5% of the patients in the dissection group, were a strong, independent prognostic factor for recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.78; P=0.005). Lymphedema was observed in 24.1% of the patients in the dissection group and in 6.3% of those in the observation group.
CONCLUSIONS: Immediate completion lymph-node dissection increased the rate of regional disease control and provided prognostic information but did not increase melanoma-specific survival among patients with melanoma and sentinel-node metastases. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; MSLT-II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00297895 .).
PMID 28591523 N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2211-2222. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613210.
|
