Now processing ... 
 Now searching ... 
 Now loading ... 

腎梗塞の診断・治療

出典
img
1: 著者提供

腎梗塞の造影腹部CT

発症翌日の造影CT画像。右腎の背側で造影剤の灌流が楔形低下している。左側はほぼ正常である。
出典
img
1: 著者提供

腎梗塞のMRI画像

ガドリニウムエンハンスT1強調冠状断画像。左腎皮質部分に楔状のエンハンス欠損領域を認める(矢印)。
出典
img
1: Skorecki, Karl, Glenn M., Philip A., et al.:Brenner and Rector's The Kidney, 10th Edition. 28. Diagnostic Kidney Imaging, Figure 28.99-A. Elsevier, 2016

腎梗塞1年後のフォローアップCT

両側腎梗塞発症1年後の造影CT。矢印部分、両側腎矢印部分にscar、腎表面のゆがみがみられる。
出典
img
1: 著者提供

腎動脈塞栓症のリスクファクター

基礎疾患としては圧倒的に心房細動が多いことがわかる。また少なからず心筋症が背景にある場合もある。
出典
imgimg
1: Renal artery embolism: a case report and review.
著者: Sheru Kansal, Myra Feldman, Stephen Cooksey, Susanj Patel
雑誌名: J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):644-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0489-5. Epub 2008 Jan 26.
Abstract/Text: Renal artery embolism was first described in 1940, but it is only recently becoming recognized as a clinically significant entity. Although relatively uncommon, it is clearly responsible for considerable morbidity in patients who experience it. The pathogenesis is typically related to cardiac thrombus formation with subsequent embolization, although other etiologies have been described. The authors present a case report followed by a review of the literature to highlight the clinical characteristics of this phenomena. Presentation, diagnostics, and treatment options will be reviewed with the aim of increasing awareness of renal artery embolism. As clinicians become more familiar with this condition, they will be more likely to consider it as a possible diagnosis in patients with a typical presentation. This will hopefully lead to improved care through prompt diagnosis and treatment, particularly as one treatment option may be time sensitive.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):644-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0489-5...

腎動脈塞栓症の患者の臨床所見

血尿がみられない腎動脈塞栓症の患者も3割近く存在する。疼痛、白血球数増多、LDH値上昇の出現頻度が高い。
出典
imgimg
1: The clinical spectrum of acute renal infarction.
著者: Ze'ev Korzets, Eleanora Plotkin, Jacques Bernheim, Rivka Zissin
雑誌名: Isr Med Assoc J. 2002 Oct;4(10):781-4.
Abstract/Text: BACKGROUND: Acute renal infarction is an oft-missed diagnosis. As a result, its true incidence, although presumed to be low, is actually unknown. Surprisingly, the medical literature on the subject, other than anecdotal case reports, is scarce.
OBJECTIVES: To increase physician awareness of the diagnosis and to identify predictive clinical and laboratory features of the entity.
METHOD: Between 1 November 1997 and 31 October 2000, 11 cases of acute renal infarction in 10 patients were diagnosed in our center by contrast-enhanced computerized tomography. The medical charts of these patients were reviewed regarding risk factors, clinical presentation, possible predictive laboratory examinations, and outcome.
RESULTS: During the 36 month observation period, the incidence of acute renal infarction was 0.007%. The mean age of the patients (5 men and 5 women) was 67.4 +/- 21.1 (range 30-87 years). In four cases the right and in five the left kidney was involved; in the other two cases bilateral involvement was seen. In 7/10 patients, an increased risk for thromboembolic events was found. Six had chronic atrial fibrillation and one had a combined activated protein C resistance and protein S deficiency. Three patients had suffered a previous thromboembolic event. Two cases were receiving anticoagulant therapy with an INR of 1.6 and 1.8, respectively. On admission, flank pain was recorded in 10/11, fever in 5 and nausea/vomiting in 4 cases. Hematuria was detected in urine reagent strips in all cases. Serum lactate dehydrogenase and white blood cell count were elevated in all cases (1,570 +/- 703 IU/L and 12,988 +/- 3,841/microliter, respectively). In no case was the diagnosis of acute renal infarction initially entertained. The working diagnoses were renal colic in 2, pyelonephritis in 3, renal carcinoma, digitalis intoxication, and suspected endocarditis in one patient each, and an acute abdomen in 3. Time from admission to definitive CT diagnosis ranged from 24 hours to 6 days. Three patients were treated with intravenous heparin and another with a combination of i.v. heparin and renal intra-arterial urokinase infusion with, in the latter case, no recovery of function of the affected kidney. With the exception of this one patient (with a contralateral contracted kidney) who required maintenance dialysis, in all other cases serum creatinine levels remained unchanged or reverted to the baseline mean of 1.1 mg/dl (0.9-1.2).
CONCLUSIONS: Acute renal infarction is not as rare as previously assumed. The entity is often misdiagnosed. Unilateral flank pain in a patient with an increased risk for thromboembolism should raise the suspicion of renal infarction. In such a setting, hematuria, leucocytosis and an elevated LDH level are strongly supportive of the diagnosis.
Isr Med Assoc J. 2002 Oct;4(10):781-4.

腎梗塞・腎動脈塞栓症診断の感度

2000年代前半の報告では腎動脈塞栓症の感度について造影CTでは80.8%となっているが、現在のCTの解像力はその当時から比べると格段の進歩を遂げており、感度はより高くなっていると考えられる。
出典
img
1: Kansal S, Feldman M, Cooksey S, et al: Renal artery embolism: a case report and review. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23(5): 644-7, Table 3.

腎動脈塞栓症の予後

腎動脈塞栓症の予後は意外にもそれほど悪くない。正常腎機能と軽度の腎機能障害を合わせると7割を超えている。ただし1年以内に死亡する例では6割近くが重度な腎障害か末期腎不全である。
出典
imgimg
1: Renal artery embolism: a case report and review.
著者: Sheru Kansal, Myra Feldman, Stephen Cooksey, Susanj Patel
雑誌名: J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):644-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0489-5. Epub 2008 Jan 26.
Abstract/Text: Renal artery embolism was first described in 1940, but it is only recently becoming recognized as a clinically significant entity. Although relatively uncommon, it is clearly responsible for considerable morbidity in patients who experience it. The pathogenesis is typically related to cardiac thrombus formation with subsequent embolization, although other etiologies have been described. The authors present a case report followed by a review of the literature to highlight the clinical characteristics of this phenomena. Presentation, diagnostics, and treatment options will be reviewed with the aim of increasing awareness of renal artery embolism. As clinicians become more familiar with this condition, they will be more likely to consider it as a possible diagnosis in patients with a typical presentation. This will hopefully lead to improved care through prompt diagnosis and treatment, particularly as one treatment option may be time sensitive.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):644-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0489-5...

スタチンの塞栓症予防効果

519人の胸部大動脈の高度なプラーク患者の塞栓症発症なし、つまり未発症率をみたものである。明らかにスタチン群のほうが、ワーファリンや抗血小板薬使用群よりも未発症率は高い。
出典
imgimg
1: Effect of treatment on the incidence of stroke and other emboli in 519 patients with severe thoracic aortic plaque.
著者: Paul A Tunick, Ambika C Nayar, Gregory M Goodkin, Sunil Mirchandani, Steven Francescone, Barry P Rosenzweig, Robin S Freedberg, Edward S Katz, Robert M Applebaum, Itzhak Kronzon, NYU Atheroma Group
雑誌名: Am J Cardiol. 2002 Dec 15;90(12):1320-5.
Abstract/Text: Severe aortic plaques seen on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) are a high-risk cause of stroke and peripheral embolization. Evidence to guide therapy is lacking. Retrospective information was obtained regarding the occurrence of embolic events (stroke, transient ischemic attacks, or peripheral emboli) in 519 patients with severe thoracic aortic plaque seen on TEE since 1988. Treatment with statins, warfarin, or antiplatelet medications was noted. Treatment was not randomized. In a matched-paired analysis, each patient taking each class of therapy was matched for age, gender, previous embolic event, hypertension, diabetes, congestive failure, and atrial fibrillation to someone not taking that medication. Multivariate analysis was also performed. An embolic event occurred in 111 patients (21%). Multivariate analysis showed that statin use was independently protective against recurrent events (p = 0.0001). Matched analysis also showed a protective effect of statins (p = 0.0004; absolute risk reduction 17%, relative risk reduction 59%, number needed to treat [n = 6]). No protective effect was found for warfarin or antiplatelet drugs. The odds ratio for embolic events was 0.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2 to 0.6) for statin therapy, 0.7 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.2) for warfarin, and 1.4 (95% CI 0.8 to 2.4) for antiplatelet agents. Thus, there is a protective effect of statin therapy, and no significant benefit of warfarin or antiplatelet drugs on the incidence of stroke and other embolic events in patients with severe thoracic aortic plaque on TEE.
Am J Cardiol. 2002 Dec 15;90(12):1320-5.

塞栓症予防効果の薬剤間の比較

同じ患者で検討したリスク比であるが、明らかにスタチンは塞栓予防に対して有益である。
出典
imgimg
1: Effect of treatment on the incidence of stroke and other emboli in 519 patients with severe thoracic aortic plaque.
著者: Paul A Tunick, Ambika C Nayar, Gregory M Goodkin, Sunil Mirchandani, Steven Francescone, Barry P Rosenzweig, Robin S Freedberg, Edward S Katz, Robert M Applebaum, Itzhak Kronzon, NYU Atheroma Group
雑誌名: Am J Cardiol. 2002 Dec 15;90(12):1320-5.
Abstract/Text: Severe aortic plaques seen on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) are a high-risk cause of stroke and peripheral embolization. Evidence to guide therapy is lacking. Retrospective information was obtained regarding the occurrence of embolic events (stroke, transient ischemic attacks, or peripheral emboli) in 519 patients with severe thoracic aortic plaque seen on TEE since 1988. Treatment with statins, warfarin, or antiplatelet medications was noted. Treatment was not randomized. In a matched-paired analysis, each patient taking each class of therapy was matched for age, gender, previous embolic event, hypertension, diabetes, congestive failure, and atrial fibrillation to someone not taking that medication. Multivariate analysis was also performed. An embolic event occurred in 111 patients (21%). Multivariate analysis showed that statin use was independently protective against recurrent events (p = 0.0001). Matched analysis also showed a protective effect of statins (p = 0.0004; absolute risk reduction 17%, relative risk reduction 59%, number needed to treat [n = 6]). No protective effect was found for warfarin or antiplatelet drugs. The odds ratio for embolic events was 0.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2 to 0.6) for statin therapy, 0.7 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.2) for warfarin, and 1.4 (95% CI 0.8 to 2.4) for antiplatelet agents. Thus, there is a protective effect of statin therapy, and no significant benefit of warfarin or antiplatelet drugs on the incidence of stroke and other embolic events in patients with severe thoracic aortic plaque on TEE.
Am J Cardiol. 2002 Dec 15;90(12):1320-5.

腎梗塞の診断・治療

出典
img
1: 著者提供

腎梗塞の造影腹部CT

発症翌日の造影CT画像。右腎の背側で造影剤の灌流が楔形低下している。左側はほぼ正常である。
出典
img
1: 著者提供