Abstract/Text: PURPOSE: To compare the respective sensitivities of unenhanced, arterial-dominant, and portal-dominant phase helical computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative depiction of hypovascular hepatic metastases by using intraoperative ultrasonographic (US) and histopathologic findings as the standard of reference.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 32 patients with 59 surgically and histopathologically proved hypovascular hepatic metastases underwent triple-phase helical CT of the liver, which included unenhanced, arterial-dominant, and portal-dominant phase scanning. Images from each phase were separately analyzed by three readers, and disagreements were resolved with consensus readings. The findings on CT images were compared with intraoperative US and histopathologic findings on a lesion-by-lesion basis to determine the sensitivity of each imaging phase. Statistical review of the lesion-by-lesion analysis was performed by using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
RESULTS: Among 59 hepatic metastases, unenhanced, arterial-dominant, and portal-dominant phase helical CT imaging depicted 39 (66.1%; 95% CI: 53.3%, 76.8%), 44 (74.5%; 95% CI: 62.2%, 83.9%), and 54 (91.5%; 95% CI: 81.6%, 96.3%) metastases, respectively. Portal-dominant phase imaging depicted significantly more hypovascular hepatic metastases than did unenhanced (P <.001) or arterial-dominant (P <.01) phase imaging (Wilcoxon test).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative use of triple-phase helical CT in patients with hypovascular hepatic metastases may not be warranted. Portal-dominant phase helical CT imaging allows depiction of significantly more hypovascular hepatic metastases than does imaging during any of the other phases.

Abstract/Text: PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI for the detection of liver metastases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with 80 liver metastases who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI using a three-dimensional volumetric interpolated technique and ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI with a mean interval of 7 days (range, 5-10 days) were included in this study. Two observers independently interpreted the two sets of images - the gadoxetic acid set (unenhanced, early dynamic and 20min delayed phase images) and the ferucarbotran set (unenhanced and ferucarbotran-enhanced T2*-weighted-gradient echo and T2-weighted turbo spin echo images). Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using the alternative-free response receiver operator characteristic (ROC) method. Sensitivity and positive predictive value were also evaluated.
RESULTS: There was a trend toward increased areas under the ROC curve (Az values) for the gadoxetic acid set (0.950, 0.948) as compared with the ferucarbotran set (0.941 and 0.939) of images, but no significant difference was found for both observers (p<0.05). Sensitivities of the gadoxetic acid set (93.8% and 92.5%) were also slightly better than those of the ferucarbotran set (88.8% and 87.5%) with no significant difference (p=0.13). The two image sets showed similar positive predictive values (98.7% and 98.6%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI showed comparable diagnostic performance to ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI for the detection of liver metastases.

Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Abstract/Text: PURPOSE: To perform a meta-analysis to obtain sensitivity estimates of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for detection of colorectal liver metastases on per-patient and per-lesion bases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CANCERLIT databases and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for relevant original articles published from January 1990 to December 2003. Criteria for inclusion of articles were as follows: Articles were reported in the English, German, or French language; CT, MR imaging, or FDG PET was performed to identify and characterize colorectal liver metastases; histopathologic analysis (surgery, biopsy, or autopsy), intraoperative observation (manual palpatation, intraoperative ultrasonography [US]), and/or follow-up US was the reference standard; and data were sufficient for calculation of true-positive or false-negative values. A random-effects linear regression model was used to obtain sensitivity estimates in assessment of liver metastases.
RESULTS: Of 165 identified relevant articles, 61 fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Sensitivity estimates on a per-patient basis for nonhelical CT, helical CT, 1.5-T MR imaging, and FDG PET were 60.2%, 64.7%, 75.8%, and 94.6%, respectively; FDG PET was the most accurate modality. On a per-lesion basis, sensitivity estimates for nonhelical CT, helical CT, 1.0-T MR imaging, 1.5-T MR imaging, and FDG PET were 52.3%, 63.8%, 66.1%, 64.4%, and 75.9%, respectively; nonhelical CT had lowest sensitivity. Estimates of gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced MR imaging were significantly better, compared with nonenhanced MR imaging (P = .019 and P < .001, respectively) and with helical CT with 45 g of iodine or less (P = .02 and P < .001, respectively). For lesions of 1 cm or larger, SPIO-enhanced MR imaging was the most accurate modality (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: FDG PET had significantly higher sensitivity on a per-patient basis, compared with that of the other modalities, but not on a per-lesion basis. Sensitivity estimates for MR imaging with contrast agent were significantly superior to those for helical CT with 45 g of iodine or less.

RSNA, 2005

Abstract/Text: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the added value of pre- and intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (transabdominal, or TCEUS and intraoperative, or ICEUS, respectively) in patients with known or highly suspected colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) who have previously undergone extensive gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) liver MRI.
METHODS: Fifteen patients with a total of 31 lesions were included in the comparison of TCEUS vs. MRI and nine patients with a total of 19 lesions were included in the comparison of ICEUS vs. MRI. MRI examinations were performed before TCEUS and ICEUS. The analysis was performed lesion by lesion. Sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV) and accuracy were calculated and compared.
RESULTS: On comparing TCEUS with MRI, sensitivity differed significantly, with values of 87% and 100%, respectively (p value < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in PPV and accuracy. The comparison of ICEUS with MRI, however, showed no significant difference in sensitivity, PPV or accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: Transabdominal and intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound have no added value in the preoperative evaluation of patients with CRLM undergoing extensive gadobenate dimeglumine liver MRI.