Abstract/Text: BACKGROUND: The International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification was established in 1999 for the prognostic evaluation of patients with neuroblastic tumors (NTs).
METHODS: Pathology slides from 746 NTs (the Children's Cancer Group [CCG]-3881 and CCG-3891 studies) were evaluated according to the International Classification. First, prognostic effects of the morphologic indicators (grade of neuroblastic differentiation: undifferentiated [U], poorly differentiated [PD] and differentiating [D]; and mitosis-karyorrhexis index [MKI]: low [L-MKI], intermediate [I-MKI], and high [H-MKI]) for tumors in the neuroblastoma (NB) category were tested. Then, prognostic significance of the International Classification for all NTs in four categories (neuroblastoma [NB]; ganglioneuroblastoma, intermixed [GNBi]; ganglioneuroma [GN]; and ganglioneuroblastoma, nodular [GNBn]) was analyzed. Finally, age distribution of the patients in the four categories as well as three subtypes (based on the grade of differentiation) in the NB category was compared.
RESULTS: There were 630 NB tumors, 30 GNBi tumors, 10 GN tumors, and 76 GNBn tumors. In the NB category, prognostic effects of the indicators (three grades of differentiation and three mitosis-karyorrhexis index [MKI] classes: low [L], intermediate [I], and high [H]) were affected significantly by the age of the patients. The age-linked evaluation of the indicators according to the International Classification successfully distinguished two prognostic subgroups: the favorable histology (FH) subgroup (PD/D and L/I-MKI tumors in patients age < 1.5 years, D and L-MKI tumors in patients ages 1.5-5.0 years; 90.4% 5-year event free survival [EFS]) and the unfavorable histology (UH) subgroup (U and/or H-MKI tumors in patients of any age, PD and/or I-MKI tumors in patients ages 1.5-5.0 years, any grade of differentiation, and any MKI class in patients age > or = 5 years; 26.9% EFS) (P < 0.0001). The International Classification also distinguished the FH group (FH subgroup with NB, GNBi, and GN tumors) and the UH group (UH subgroup with NB and GNBn tumors) for all NTs (90.8% EFS and 31.2% EFS, respectively; P < 0.0001) and provided independent prognostic information on both patient age and disease stage (P < 0.0001). Among patients with FH tumors, the median ages of patients with the PD and D subtype tumors in the NB category were 0.43 years (range, 0-1.50 years) and 1.50 years (range, 0.02-4.65 years), respectively, and the median ages of patients with GNBi and GN tumors were 3.51 years (range, 0.96-14.85 years) and 4.80 years (range, 1.94-17.05 years), respectively. In contrast, patients with UH tumors generally were older when they were diagnosed, and with median ages of 2.99 years (range, 1.30-8.84 years) for patients with U subtype tumors, 2.59 years (range, 0.0-12.57 years) for patients with PD subtype tumors, 2.16 years (range, 0.35-9.90) for patients with D subtype tumors, and 3.26 years (range, 0.57-15.90 years) for patients with GNBn tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the prognostic significance of the International Classification, substantiated age-linked prognostic effects of the morphologic indicators for patients with the tumors in the NB category, and supported the concept of an age-appropriate framework of maturation for patients with the tumors in the FH group.

Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.

Abstract/Text: PURPOSE: Because current approaches to risk classification and treatment stratification for children with neuroblastoma (NB) vary greatly throughout the world, it is difficult to directly compare risk-based clinical trials. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system was developed to establish a consensus approach for pretreatment risk stratification.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The statistical and clinical significance of 13 potential prognostic factors were analyzed in a cohort of 8,800 children diagnosed with NB between 1990 and 2002 from North America and Australia (Children's Oncology Group), Europe (International Society of Pediatric Oncology Europe Neuroblastoma Group and German Pediatric Oncology and Hematology Group), and Japan. Survival tree regression analyses using event-free survival (EFS) as the primary end point were performed to test the prognostic significance of the 13 factors.
RESULTS: Stage, age, histologic category, grade of tumor differentiation, the status of the MYCN oncogene, chromosome 11q status, and DNA ploidy were the most highly statistically significant and clinically relevant factors. A new staging system (INRG Staging System) based on clinical criteria and tumor imaging was developed for the INRG Classification System. The optimal age cutoff was determined to be between 15 and 19 months, and 18 months was selected for the classification system. Sixteen pretreatment groups were defined on the basis of clinical criteria and statistically significantly different EFS of the cohort stratified by the INRG criteria. Patients with 5-year EFS more than 85%, more than 75% to < or = 85%, > or = 50% to < or = 75%, or less than 50% were classified as very low risk, low risk, intermediate risk, or high risk, respectively.
CONCLUSION: By defining homogenous pretreatment patient cohorts, the INRG classification system will greatly facilitate the comparison of risk-based clinical trials conducted in different regions of the world and the development of international collaborative studies.

Abstract/Text: The clinical hallmark of neuroblastoma is heterogeneity, with the likelihood of cure varying widely according to age at diagnosis, extent of disease, and tumour biology. A subset of tumours will undergo spontaneous regression while others show relentless progression. Around half of all cases are currently classified as high-risk for disease relapse, with overall survival rates less than 40% despite intensive multimodal therapy. This Seminar focuses on recent advances in our understanding of the biology of this complex paediatric solid tumour. We outline plans for the development of a uniform International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system, and summarise strategies for risk-based therapies. We also update readers on new discoveries related to the underlying molecular pathogenesis of this tumour, with special emphasis on advances that are translatable to the clinic. Finally, we discuss new approaches to treatment, including recently discovered molecular targets that might provide more effective treatment strategies with the potential for less toxicity.