Now processing ... 
 Now searching ... 
 Now loading ... 

癌治療関連骨減少症(CTIBL)診療マニュアル(2020年)

出典
img
1: [http://www.jpof.or.jp/ 日本骨代謝学会]:[http://jsbmr.umin.jp/guide/pdf/ctiblmanual2020.pdf 癌治療関連骨減少症 (CTIBL)診療マニュアル] J Bone Miner Metab 38:141-144, 2020.

臨床的骨折リスク因子と10年間骨粗鬆症性骨折・大腿骨近位部骨折の確率

65歳女性(BMI 23.4 kg/m2)における、骨粗鬆症性骨折(大腿骨近位部、臨床脊椎、上腕骨、前腕)と大腿骨近位部骨折の確率
出典
imgimg
1: Development and application of a Japanese model of the WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX).
著者: S Fujiwara, T Nakamura, H Orimo, T Hosoi, I Gorai, A Oden, H Johansson, J A Kanis
雑誌名: Osteoporos Int. 2008 Apr;19(4):429-35. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0544-4. Epub 2008 Feb 22.
Abstract/Text: UNLABELLED: The present study estimated the 10-year probability using the Japanese version of WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) in order to determine fracture probabilities that correspond to intervention thresholds currently used in Japan and to resolve some issues for its use in Japan.
INTRODUCTION: The objective of the present study was to evaluate a Japanese version of the WHO fracture risk assessment (FRAX) tool to compute 10-year probabilities of osteoporotic fracture in Japanese men and women. Since lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) is used preferentially as a site for assessment, and densitometers use Japanese reference data, a second aim was to investigate the suitability and impact of this practice in Japan.
METHODS: Fracture probabilities were computed from published data on the fracture and death hazards in Japan. Probabilities took account of age, sex, the presence of clinical risk factors and femoral neck BMD. Fracture probabilities were determined that were equivalent to intervention thresholds currently used in Japan. The difference between T-scores derived from international reference data and that using Japanese-specific normal ranges was estimated from published sources. The gradient of risk of BMD for fracture in Japan was compared to that for BMD at the lumbar spine in the Hiroshima cohort.
RESULTS: The 10-year probabilities of a major osteoporosis-related fracture that corresponded to current intervention thresholds ranged from approximately 5% at the age of 50 years to more than 20% at the age of 80 years. The use of femoral neck BMD predicts fracture as well as or better than BMD tests at the lumbar spine. There were small differences in T-scores between those used for the model and those derived from a Japanese reference population.
CONCLUSIONS: The FRAX mark tool has been used to determine possible thresholds for therapeutic intervention, based on equivalence of risk with current guidelines. The approach will need to be supported by appropriate health economic analyses. Femoral neck BMD is suitable for the prediction of fracture risk among Japanese. However, when applying the FRAX model to Japan, T-scores and Z-scores should be converted to those derived from the international reference.
Osteoporos Int. 2008 Apr;19(4):429-35. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0544-4....

骨粗鬆症治療薬の有効性グレード一覧

出典
img
1: 骨粗鬆症の予防と治療ガイドライン作成委員会(日本骨粗鬆症学会 日本骨代謝学会 骨粗鬆症財団)編:骨粗鬆症の予防と治療ガイドライン2015年版. ライフサイエンス出版, 2015

診断アルゴリズム

参考文献:
宗圓 聰ほか:原発性骨粗鬆症の診断基準(2012年度改訂版).
Osteoporosis Japan 2013; 21(1):9-21.
出典
img
1: 著者提供

骨粗鬆症薬物治療開始基準

出典
img
1: 骨粗鬆症の予防と治療ガイドライン作成委員会(日本骨粗鬆症学会 日本骨代謝学会 骨粗鬆症財団)編:骨粗鬆症の予防と治療ガイドライン 2015年版. ライフサイエンス出版,2015;63

骨代謝マーカーを用いた骨粗鬆症治療判定のフローチャート

出典
img
1: 骨粗鬆症の予防と治療ガイドライン作成委員会(日本骨粗鬆症学会 日本骨代謝学会 骨粗鬆症財団)編:骨粗鬆症の予防と治療ガイドライン 2015年版. ライフサイエンス出版,2015;71

わが国のグルココルチコイド誘発性骨粗鬆症の管理と治療のガイドライン(2023年度版)

GC:グルココルチコイド、RANKL:receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand、SERM:選択的エストロゲン受容体モジュレーター、PSL:プレドニゾロン、YAM:young adult mean
*6カ月から1年ごとの腰椎単純X線撮影、骨密度測定
出典
img
1: 日本骨代謝学会 グルココルチコイド誘発性骨粗鬆症の管理と治療のガイドライン作成委員会(委員長 田中良哉)編: グルココルチコイド誘発性骨粗鬆症の管理と治療のガイドライン2023、南山堂、2023.

癌治療関連骨減少症(CTIBL)診療マニュアル(2020年)

出典
img
1: [http://www.jpof.or.jp/ 日本骨代謝学会]:[http://jsbmr.umin.jp/guide/pdf/ctiblmanual2020.pdf 癌治療関連骨減少症 (CTIBL)診療マニュアル] J Bone Miner Metab 38:141-144, 2020.

臨床的骨折リスク因子と10年間骨粗鬆症性骨折・大腿骨近位部骨折の確率

65歳女性(BMI 23.4 kg/m2)における、骨粗鬆症性骨折(大腿骨近位部、臨床脊椎、上腕骨、前腕)と大腿骨近位部骨折の確率
出典
imgimg
1: Development and application of a Japanese model of the WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX).
著者: S Fujiwara, T Nakamura, H Orimo, T Hosoi, I Gorai, A Oden, H Johansson, J A Kanis
雑誌名: Osteoporos Int. 2008 Apr;19(4):429-35. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0544-4. Epub 2008 Feb 22.
Abstract/Text: UNLABELLED: The present study estimated the 10-year probability using the Japanese version of WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) in order to determine fracture probabilities that correspond to intervention thresholds currently used in Japan and to resolve some issues for its use in Japan.
INTRODUCTION: The objective of the present study was to evaluate a Japanese version of the WHO fracture risk assessment (FRAX) tool to compute 10-year probabilities of osteoporotic fracture in Japanese men and women. Since lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) is used preferentially as a site for assessment, and densitometers use Japanese reference data, a second aim was to investigate the suitability and impact of this practice in Japan.
METHODS: Fracture probabilities were computed from published data on the fracture and death hazards in Japan. Probabilities took account of age, sex, the presence of clinical risk factors and femoral neck BMD. Fracture probabilities were determined that were equivalent to intervention thresholds currently used in Japan. The difference between T-scores derived from international reference data and that using Japanese-specific normal ranges was estimated from published sources. The gradient of risk of BMD for fracture in Japan was compared to that for BMD at the lumbar spine in the Hiroshima cohort.
RESULTS: The 10-year probabilities of a major osteoporosis-related fracture that corresponded to current intervention thresholds ranged from approximately 5% at the age of 50 years to more than 20% at the age of 80 years. The use of femoral neck BMD predicts fracture as well as or better than BMD tests at the lumbar spine. There were small differences in T-scores between those used for the model and those derived from a Japanese reference population.
CONCLUSIONS: The FRAX mark tool has been used to determine possible thresholds for therapeutic intervention, based on equivalence of risk with current guidelines. The approach will need to be supported by appropriate health economic analyses. Femoral neck BMD is suitable for the prediction of fracture risk among Japanese. However, when applying the FRAX model to Japan, T-scores and Z-scores should be converted to those derived from the international reference.
Osteoporos Int. 2008 Apr;19(4):429-35. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0544-4....