Now processing ... 
 Now searching ... 
 Now loading ... 

GRAPPA(Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis)2021

csDMARD: 従来型疾患修飾性抗リウマチ薬、bDMARD: 生物学的疾患修飾性抗リウマチ薬、TNFi:TNF阻害薬、IL-12/23i:IL-12/23阻害薬、IL-17i:IL-17阻害薬、IL-23i:IL-23阻害薬、CTLA4-Ig:アバタセプト、JAKi:JAK阻害薬、PDE4i:PDE4阻害薬、MTX:メトトレキサート、ETN:エタネルセプト
 
出典
imgimg
1: Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA): updated treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis 2021.
著者: Laura C Coates, Enrique R Soriano, Nadia Corp, Heidi Bertheussen, Kristina Callis Duffin, Cristiano B Campanholo, Jeffrey Chau, Lihi Eder, Daniel G Fernández-Ávila, Oliver FitzGerald, Amit Garg, Dafna D Gladman, Niti Goel, Philip S Helliwell, M Elaine Husni, Deepak R Jadon, Arnon Katz, Dhruvkumar Laheru, John Latella, Ying-Ying Leung, Christine Lindsay, Ennio Lubrano, Luis Daniel Mazzuoccolo, Philip J Mease, Denis O'Sullivan, Alexis Ogdie, Wendy Olsder, Penelope Esther Palominos, Lori Schick, Ingrid Steinkoenig, Maarten de Wit, D A van der Windt, Arthur Kavanaugh, GRAPPA Treatment Recommendations domain subcommittees
雑誌名: Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022 Aug;18(8):465-479. doi: 10.1038/s41584-022-00798-0. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
Abstract/Text: Since the second version of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) treatment recommendations were published in 2015, therapeutic options for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have advanced considerably. This work reviews the literature since the previous recommendations (data published 2013-2020, including conference presentations between 2017 and 2020) and reports high-quality, evidence-based, domain-focused recommendations for medication selection in PsA developed by GRAPPA clinicians and patient research partners. The overarching principles for the management of adults with PsA were updated by consensus. Principles considering biosimilars and tapering of therapy were added, and the research agenda was revised. Literature searches covered treatments for the key domains of PsA: peripheral arthritis, axial disease, enthesitis, dactylitis, and skin and nail psoriasis; additional searches were performed for PsA-related conditions (uveitis and inflammatory bowel disease) and comorbidities. Individual subcommittees used a GRADE-informed approach, taking into account the quality of evidence for therapies, to generate recommendations for each of these domains, which were incorporated into an overall schema. Choice of therapy for an individual should ideally address all disease domains active in that patient, supporting shared decision-making. As safety issues often affect potential therapeutic choices, additional consideration was given to relevant comorbidities. These GRAPPA treatment recommendations provide up-to-date, evidence-based guidance on PsA management for clinicians and people with PsA.

© 2022. Springer Nature Limited.
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022 Aug;18(8):465-479. doi: 10.1038/s41584-022-007...

CASPAR分類基準

出典
imgimg
1: Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study.
著者: William Taylor, Dafna Gladman, Philip Helliwell, Antonio Marchesoni, Philip Mease, Herman Mielants, CASPAR Study Group
雑誌名: Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Aug;54(8):2665-73. doi: 10.1002/art.21972.
Abstract/Text: OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of existing classification criteria for the diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and to construct new criteria from observed data.
METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from consecutive clinic attendees with PsA and other inflammatory arthropathies. Subjects were classified by each of 7 criteria. Sensitivity and specificity were compared using conditional logistic regression analysis. Latent class analysis was used to calculate criteria accuracy in order to confirm the validity of clinical diagnosis as the gold standard definition of "case"-ness. Classification and Regression Trees methodology and logistic regression were used to identify items for new criteria, which were then constructed using a receiver operating characteristic curve.
RESULTS: Data were collected on 588 cases and 536 controls with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 384), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 72), undifferentiated arthritis (n = 38), connective tissue disorders (n = 14), and other diseases (n = 28). The specificity of each set of criteria was high. The sensitivity of the Vasey and Espinoza method (0.97) was similar to that of the method of McGonagle et al (0.98) and greater than that of the methods of Bennett (0.44), Moll and Wright (0.91), the European Spondylarthropathy Study Group (0.74), and Gladman et al (0.91). The CASPAR (ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis) criteria consisted of established inflammatory articular disease with at least 3 points from the following features: current psoriasis (assigned a score of 2; all other features were assigned a score of 1), a history of psoriasis (unless current psoriasis was present), a family history of psoriasis (unless current psoriasis was present or there was a history of psoriasis), dactylitis, juxtaarticular new bone formation, rheumatoid factor negativity, and nail dystrophy. These criteria were more specific (0.987 versus 0.960) but less sensitive (0.914 versus 0.972) than those of Vasey and Espinoza.
CONCLUSION: The CASPAR criteria are simple and highly specific but less sensitive than the Vasey and Espinoza criteria.
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Aug;54(8):2665-73. doi: 10.1002/art.21972.

乾癬性関節炎の管理に関する欧州リウマチ学会2019の推奨

  1. 欧州リウマチ学会2019における12の治療推奨
推奨(括弧内は、証拠レベル 推奨グレード 同意レベル)
1. 定期的な疾患活動性評価と治療の適切な調整により、寛解あるいは低疾患活動性を目指した治療を行うべきである。(1b, A, 9.4)
2. NSAIDsは筋骨格系の兆候や症状を緩和するために使用される。(1b, A, 9.6)
3. ステロイド局所注射は乾癬性関節炎の補助療法として考慮されるべきである。(3b, C, 9.5)ステロイドの全身投与は最少有効量で注意して使用する。(4, C, 9.5)
4. 多関節炎の患者ではcsDMARDを迅速に開始すべきである。関連皮膚病変がある場合はメトトレキサートが望ましい。(1b, B, 9.5)
5. 単関節炎や少関節炎の患者で、特に構造的破壊、血沈亢進/CRP高値、指趾炎、爪病変などの予後不良因子がある場合はcsDMARDを考慮するべきである。(4, C, 9.3)
6. 末梢関節炎や少なくとも一つのcsDMARDで反応が不十分な場合は、bDMARDによる治療を開始する必要がある。関連皮膚病変がある場合はIL-17阻害薬やIL-12/23阻害薬が望ましいことがある。(1b, B, 9.4)
7. 末梢関節炎や少なくとも一つのcsDMARDと少なくとも一つのbDMARDで反応が不十分な場合、あるいはbDMARDが適切でない場合は、JAK阻害薬を考慮する。(1b, B, 9.2)
8. 軽症患者(5,B, 8.5)で少なくとも一つのcsDMARDで反応が不十分(1b,B, 8.5)でbDMARDやJAK阻害薬ともに適切でない場合(5,B, 8.5)は、PDE4阻害薬を考慮する。
9. 明らかな付着部炎があり、NSAIDsやステロイド局所注射に対する反応が不十分な場合は、bDMARDによる治療を考慮するべきである。(1b, B, 9.3)
10. 体軸性の病変が優位な患者で、活動性がありNSAIDsに対する反応が不十分であれば、bDMARDを考慮するべきである。通常TNF阻害薬を用いるが、関連皮膚病変がある場合はIL-17阻害薬が望ましいことがある。(1b, B, 9.7)
11. bDMARDに適切に反応しない、あるいは使用できない場合は、クラス内の切り替え(4,C, 9.5)を含めて、別のbDMARDやtsDMARD(1b,C, 9.5)を考慮するべきである。
12. 寛解を維持している患者ではDMARDsの慎重な減量を考慮してもよい。(4, C, 9.5)
csDMARD: 従来型疾患修飾性抗リウマチ薬、bDMARD: 生物学的疾患修飾性抗リウマチ薬、tsDMARD: 分子標的合成疾患修飾性抗リウマチ薬
出典
imgimg
1: EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update.
著者: Laure Gossec, Xenofon Baraliakos, Andreas Kerschbaumer, Maarten de Wit, Iain McInnes, Maxime Dougados, Jette Primdahl, Dennis G McGonagle, Daniel Aletaha, Andra Balanescu, Peter V Balint, Heidi Bertheussen, Wolf-Henning Boehncke, Gerd R Burmester, Juan D Canete, Nemanja S Damjanov, Tue Wenzel Kragstrup, Tore K Kvien, Robert B M Landewé, Rik Jozef Urbain Lories, Helena Marzo-Ortega, Denis Poddubnyy, Santiago Andres Rodrigues Manica, Georg Schett, Douglas J Veale, Filip E Van den Bosch, Désirée van der Heijde, Josef S Smolen
雑誌名: Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):700-712. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217159.
Abstract/Text: OBJECTIVE: To update the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
METHODS: According to the EULAR standardised operating procedures, a systematic literature review was followed by a consensus meeting to develop this update involving 28 international taskforce members in May 2019. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendations were determined.
RESULTS: The updated recommendations comprise 6 overarching principles and 12 recommendations. The overarching principles address the nature of PsA and diversity of both musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal manifestations; the need for collaborative management and shared decision-making is highlighted. The recommendations provide a treatment strategy for pharmacological therapies. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and local glucocorticoid injections are proposed as initial therapy; for patients with arthritis and poor prognostic factors, such as polyarthritis or monoarthritis/oligoarthritis accompanied by factors such as dactylitis or joint damage, rapid initiation of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs is recommended. If the treatment target is not achieved with this strategy, a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) targeting tumour necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-17A or IL-12/23 should be initiated, taking into account skin involvement if relevant. If axial disease predominates, a TNF inhibitor or IL-17A inhibitor should be started as first-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. Use of Janus kinase inhibitors is addressed primarily after bDMARD failure. Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibition is proposed for patients in whom these other drugs are inappropriate, generally in the context of mild disease. Drug switches and tapering in sustained remission are addressed.
CONCLUSION: These recommendations provide stakeholders with an updated consensus on the pharmacological management of PsA, based on a combination of evidence and expert opinion.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):700-712. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-2...

GRAPPA(Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis)2021

csDMARD: 従来型疾患修飾性抗リウマチ薬、bDMARD: 生物学的疾患修飾性抗リウマチ薬、TNFi:TNF阻害薬、IL-12/23i:IL-12/23阻害薬、IL-17i:IL-17阻害薬、IL-23i:IL-23阻害薬、CTLA4-Ig:アバタセプト、JAKi:JAK阻害薬、PDE4i:PDE4阻害薬、MTX:メトトレキサート、ETN:エタネルセプト
 
出典
imgimg
1: Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA): updated treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis 2021.
著者: Laura C Coates, Enrique R Soriano, Nadia Corp, Heidi Bertheussen, Kristina Callis Duffin, Cristiano B Campanholo, Jeffrey Chau, Lihi Eder, Daniel G Fernández-Ávila, Oliver FitzGerald, Amit Garg, Dafna D Gladman, Niti Goel, Philip S Helliwell, M Elaine Husni, Deepak R Jadon, Arnon Katz, Dhruvkumar Laheru, John Latella, Ying-Ying Leung, Christine Lindsay, Ennio Lubrano, Luis Daniel Mazzuoccolo, Philip J Mease, Denis O'Sullivan, Alexis Ogdie, Wendy Olsder, Penelope Esther Palominos, Lori Schick, Ingrid Steinkoenig, Maarten de Wit, D A van der Windt, Arthur Kavanaugh, GRAPPA Treatment Recommendations domain subcommittees
雑誌名: Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022 Aug;18(8):465-479. doi: 10.1038/s41584-022-00798-0. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
Abstract/Text: Since the second version of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) treatment recommendations were published in 2015, therapeutic options for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have advanced considerably. This work reviews the literature since the previous recommendations (data published 2013-2020, including conference presentations between 2017 and 2020) and reports high-quality, evidence-based, domain-focused recommendations for medication selection in PsA developed by GRAPPA clinicians and patient research partners. The overarching principles for the management of adults with PsA were updated by consensus. Principles considering biosimilars and tapering of therapy were added, and the research agenda was revised. Literature searches covered treatments for the key domains of PsA: peripheral arthritis, axial disease, enthesitis, dactylitis, and skin and nail psoriasis; additional searches were performed for PsA-related conditions (uveitis and inflammatory bowel disease) and comorbidities. Individual subcommittees used a GRADE-informed approach, taking into account the quality of evidence for therapies, to generate recommendations for each of these domains, which were incorporated into an overall schema. Choice of therapy for an individual should ideally address all disease domains active in that patient, supporting shared decision-making. As safety issues often affect potential therapeutic choices, additional consideration was given to relevant comorbidities. These GRAPPA treatment recommendations provide up-to-date, evidence-based guidance on PsA management for clinicians and people with PsA.

© 2022. Springer Nature Limited.
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022 Aug;18(8):465-479. doi: 10.1038/s41584-022-007...

CASPAR分類基準

出典
imgimg
1: Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study.
著者: William Taylor, Dafna Gladman, Philip Helliwell, Antonio Marchesoni, Philip Mease, Herman Mielants, CASPAR Study Group
雑誌名: Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Aug;54(8):2665-73. doi: 10.1002/art.21972.
Abstract/Text: OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of existing classification criteria for the diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and to construct new criteria from observed data.
METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from consecutive clinic attendees with PsA and other inflammatory arthropathies. Subjects were classified by each of 7 criteria. Sensitivity and specificity were compared using conditional logistic regression analysis. Latent class analysis was used to calculate criteria accuracy in order to confirm the validity of clinical diagnosis as the gold standard definition of "case"-ness. Classification and Regression Trees methodology and logistic regression were used to identify items for new criteria, which were then constructed using a receiver operating characteristic curve.
RESULTS: Data were collected on 588 cases and 536 controls with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 384), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 72), undifferentiated arthritis (n = 38), connective tissue disorders (n = 14), and other diseases (n = 28). The specificity of each set of criteria was high. The sensitivity of the Vasey and Espinoza method (0.97) was similar to that of the method of McGonagle et al (0.98) and greater than that of the methods of Bennett (0.44), Moll and Wright (0.91), the European Spondylarthropathy Study Group (0.74), and Gladman et al (0.91). The CASPAR (ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis) criteria consisted of established inflammatory articular disease with at least 3 points from the following features: current psoriasis (assigned a score of 2; all other features were assigned a score of 1), a history of psoriasis (unless current psoriasis was present), a family history of psoriasis (unless current psoriasis was present or there was a history of psoriasis), dactylitis, juxtaarticular new bone formation, rheumatoid factor negativity, and nail dystrophy. These criteria were more specific (0.987 versus 0.960) but less sensitive (0.914 versus 0.972) than those of Vasey and Espinoza.
CONCLUSION: The CASPAR criteria are simple and highly specific but less sensitive than the Vasey and Espinoza criteria.
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Aug;54(8):2665-73. doi: 10.1002/art.21972.