Now processing ... 
 Now searching ... 
 Now loading ... 

mRSSの計算方法

出典
img
1: 出典:難病情報センターホームページ(2022年2月現在)から引用https://www.nanbyou.or.jp/entry/4027

皮膚硬化

a:手指に限局した皮膚硬化
b:前腕の皮膚硬化
出典
img
1: Firestein, Gary S. et al:Kelley and Firestein's Textbook of Rheumatology, 10th ed, Chapter84: Clinical Features and Treatment of Scleroderma, Figure 84-7 A.C, Elsevier, 2017.

Raynaud現象

Raynaud現象は、寒冷刺激や感情変化によって誘発される末梢動脈の攣縮がもたらす四肢末梢の虚血性変化である。比較的短時間のうちに蒼白⇒紫(チアノーゼ)⇒赤へと色調変化がみられるが、全患者で典型的な3相性の経過をたどるとは限らない。強皮症患者の90%程度でみられるとされている。
出典
img
1: Firestein, Gary S. et al:Kelley and Firestein's Textbook of Rheumatology, 10th ed, Chapter84: Clinical Features and Treatment of Scleroderma, Figure 84-2, Elsevier, 2017.

Video capillary scopeによる爪郭毛細血管異常所見

a:正常、b:早期SSC、c:活動性SSC、d:晩期SSC
G:拡張、M:出血、N:血管新生、L:無血管
出典
img
1: Firestein, Gary S. et al:Kelley and Firestein's Textbook of Rheumatology, 10th ed, Chapter84: Clinical Features and Treatment of Scleroderma, Figure 84-4, Elsevier, 2017.

強皮症(SSc)の病型分類と臨床的特徴

図は強皮症の病型分類とその臨床像のまとめである。初診時の病型分類、およびその後のフォローアップの際に参考となる。
出典
img
1: 日本皮膚科学会、全身性強皮症診療ガイドライン作成委員会編:全身性強皮症診療ガイドライン2012. 日皮会誌, 122(5); p1297, 表6, 2012.

診断基準

わが国では厚生労働省研究班により診断基準が提唱されている。ただし、手指腫脹のみで皮膚硬化が明らかでない早期例など、すべてに適応はできない。
出典
img
1: 日本皮膚科学会、全身性強皮症 診断基準・重症度分類・診療ガイドライン委員会編:全身性強皮症 診断基準・重症度分類・診療ガイドライン、日本皮膚科学会雑誌:126(10);1831-1896, p1831, 2016.

ACR(米国リウマチ学会)/EULAR(欧州リウマチ学会)による全身性強皮症の分類基準2013

2013年に米国リウマチ学会と欧州リウマチ学会から共同で新しい全身性強皮症の分類基準が提唱され、より早期の診断が可能となった。
出典
imgimg
1: 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative.
著者: Frank van den Hoogen, Dinesh Khanna, Jaap Fransen, Sindhu R Johnson, Murray Baron, Alan Tyndall, Marco Matucci-Cerinic, Raymond P Naden, Thomas A Medsger, Patricia E Carreira, Gabriela Riemekasten, Philip J Clements, Christopher P Denton, Oliver Distler, Yannick Allanore, Daniel E Furst, Armando Gabrielli, Maureen D Mayes, Jacob M van Laar, James R Seibold, Laszlo Czirjak, Virginia D Steen, Murat Inanc, Otylia Kowal-Bielecka, Ulf Müller-Ladner, Gabriele Valentini, Douglas J Veale, Madelon C Vonk, Ulrich A Walker, Lorinda Chung, David H Collier, Mary Ellen Csuka, Barri J Fessler, Serena Guiducci, Ariane Herrick, Vivien M Hsu, Sergio Jimenez, Bashar Kahaleh, Peter A Merkel, Stanislav Sierakowski, Richard M Silver, Robert W Simms, John Varga, Janet E Pope
雑誌名: Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Nov;72(11):1747-55. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204424.
Abstract/Text: OBJECTIVE: The 1980 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for systemic sclerosis (SSc) lack sensitivity for early SSc and limited cutaneous SSc. The present work, by a joint committee of the ACR and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), was undertaken for the purpose of developing new classification criteria for SSc.
METHODS: Using consensus methods, 23 candidate items were arranged in a multicriteria additive point system with a threshold to classify cases as SSc. The classification system was reduced by clustering items and simplifying weights. The system was tested by (1) determining specificity and sensitivity in SSc cases and controls with scleroderma-like disorders, and (2) validating against the combined view of a group of experts on a set of cases with or without SSc.
RESULTS: It was determined that skin thickening of the fingers extending proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joints is sufficient for the patient to be classified as having SSc; if that is not present, seven additive items apply, with varying weights for each: skin thickening of the fingers, fingertip lesions, telangiectasia, abnormal nailfold capillaries, interstitial lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension, Raynaud's phenomenon, and SSc-related autoantibodies. Sensitivity and specificity in the validation sample were, respectively, 0.91 and 0.92 for the new classification criteria and 0.75 and 0.72 for the 1980 ACR classification criteria. All selected cases were classified in accordance with consensus-based expert opinion. All cases classified as SSc according to the 1980 ACR criteria were classified as SSc with the new criteria, and several additional cases were now considered to be SSc.
CONCLUSIONS: The ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc performed better than the 1980 ACR criteria for SSc and should allow for more patients to be classified correctly as having the disease.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Nov;72(11):1747-55. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-...

治療アルゴリズム(案)

出典
img
1: 日本呼吸器学会/日本リウマチ学会 編:膠原病に伴う間質性肺疾患 診断・治療指針2020.メディカルレビュー社、2020、p93、図2

mRSSの計算方法

出典
img
1: 出典:難病情報センターホームページ(2022年2月現在)から引用https://www.nanbyou.or.jp/entry/4027

皮膚硬化

a:手指に限局した皮膚硬化
b:前腕の皮膚硬化
出典
img
1: Firestein, Gary S. et al:Kelley and Firestein's Textbook of Rheumatology, 10th ed, Chapter84: Clinical Features and Treatment of Scleroderma, Figure 84-7 A.C, Elsevier, 2017.