Now processing ... 
 Now searching ... 
 Now loading ... 

Wells score

出典
img
1: 編集部にて作成

外頚静脈拡張

右心系負荷を示す。内頚静脈の波形は時間をかけて視診を行うことで確認できる。
出典
img
1: Lee Goldman: Approach to the Patient with Possible Cardiovascular Disease. Goldman’s Cecil Medicine, 24th ed. Saunders, 2011; Figure 50-3.

Tripod position 口すぼめもしている

COPD患者が前傾姿勢で両手を膝につく(tripod position)ことにより、胸鎖乳突筋や僧帽筋などの副呼吸筋を使いやすくしている。
出典
img
1: James K. Stoller, Nicholas S. Hill: Respiratory Monitoring in Critical Care. Goldman’s Cecil Medicine, 24th ed. Saunders, 2011; E-Figure 103-1.

心原性肺水腫

出典
img
1: Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and Pulmonary Edema. Mettler: Essentials of Radiology, 2nd ed. Saunders, 2005; Figure 3-67.

心タンポナーデ

心タンポナーデのエコー所見
出典
img
1: Marc Eckstein and Sean O. Henderson: Thoracic Trauma. Marx: Rosen’s Emergency Medicine, 7th ed. Mosby, 2009; Figure 42-14.

緊張性気胸

左肺は完全に虚脱している。
出典
img
1: Goldman L, Ausiello D: Cecil’s Textbook of Medicine, 23rd ed, Philadelphia, Saunders Elsevier, 2008, p 601, Fig. 84-11.

血管浮腫

口唇の腫脹を認める。
出典
img
1: Urticaria and Angioedema. Habif: Clinical Dermatology, 5th ed. Mosby, 2009; Figure 6-19.

胸水の主な原因

漏出液、滲出液を来す主な疾患。
出典
img
1: McCool FD. Pleural effusion. In Chapter 99: Diseases of the Diaphragm, Chest Wall , Pleura, and Mediastinum. Goldman: Goldman’s Cecil Medicine. 24 th edition.

胸水の胸部レントゲン所見

両側Costophrenic Angleがdullとなっている。
出典
img
1: Goldman’s Cecil Medicine, 24th ed, Philadelphia, Saunders Elsevier, 2012, p 608, Fig. 99-2.

ライトの基準

いずれか1つでも満たせば滲出液を考える。
出典
img
1: McCool FD. Pleural effusion. In Chapter 99: Diseases of the Diaphragm, Chest Wall , Pleura, and Mediastinum. Goldman: Goldman’s Cecil Medicine. 24 th edition.

心不全の診断のための病歴と身体所見

心不全の診断のために有用な病歴、身体所見の感度、特異度
出典
imgimg
1: Does this dyspneic patient in the emergency department have congestive heart failure?
著者: Charlie S Wang, J Mark FitzGerald, Michael Schulzer, Edwin Mak, Najib T Ayas
雑誌名: JAMA. 2005 Oct 19;294(15):1944-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.15.1944.
Abstract/Text: CONTEXT: Dyspnea is a common complaint in the emergency department where physicians must accurately make a rapid diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of history, symptoms, and signs along with routine diagnostic studies (chest radiograph, electrocardiogram, and serum B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP]) that differentiate heart failure from other causes of dyspnea in the emergency department.
DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE (1966-July 2005) and the reference lists from retrieved articles, previous reviews, and physical examination textbooks.
STUDY SELECTION: We retained 22 studies of various findings for diagnosing heart failure in adult patients presenting with dyspnea to the emergency department.
DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently abstracted data (sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios [LRs]) and assessed methodological quality.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Many features increased the probability of heart failure, with the best feature for each category being the presence of (1) past history of heart failure (positive LR = 5.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1-8.0); (2) the symptom of paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea (positive LR = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5-4.5); (3) the sign of the third heart sound (S(3)) gallop (positive LR = 11; 95% CI, 4.9-25.0); (4) the chest radiograph showing pulmonary venous congestion (positive LR = 12.0; 95% CI, 6.8-21.0); and (5) electrocardiogram showing atrial fibrillation (positive LR = 3.8; 95% CI, 1.7-8.8). The features that best decreased the probability of heart failure were the absence of (1) past history of heart failure (negative LR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.38-0.53); (2) the symptom of dyspnea on exertion (negative LR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.35-0.67); (3) rales (negative LR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.37-0.70); (4) the chest radiograph showing cardiomegaly (negative LR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.23-0.48); and (5) any electrocardiogram abnormality (negative LR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47-0.88). A low serum BNP proved to be the most useful test (serum B-type natriuretic peptide <100 pg/mL; negative LR = 0.11; 95% CI, 0.07-0.16).
CONCLUSIONS: For dyspneic adult emergency department patients, a directed history, physical examination, chest radiograph, and electrocardiography should be performed. If the suspicion of heart failure remains, obtaining a serum BNP level may be helpful, especially for excluding heart failure.
JAMA. 2005 Oct 19;294(15):1944-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.15.1944.

心不全診断に有用な検査

心不全診断に必要な検査所見の感度、特異度
出典
imgimg
1: Does this dyspneic patient in the emergency department have congestive heart failure?
著者: Charlie S Wang, J Mark FitzGerald, Michael Schulzer, Edwin Mak, Najib T Ayas
雑誌名: JAMA. 2005 Oct 19;294(15):1944-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.15.1944.
Abstract/Text: CONTEXT: Dyspnea is a common complaint in the emergency department where physicians must accurately make a rapid diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of history, symptoms, and signs along with routine diagnostic studies (chest radiograph, electrocardiogram, and serum B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP]) that differentiate heart failure from other causes of dyspnea in the emergency department.
DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE (1966-July 2005) and the reference lists from retrieved articles, previous reviews, and physical examination textbooks.
STUDY SELECTION: We retained 22 studies of various findings for diagnosing heart failure in adult patients presenting with dyspnea to the emergency department.
DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently abstracted data (sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios [LRs]) and assessed methodological quality.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Many features increased the probability of heart failure, with the best feature for each category being the presence of (1) past history of heart failure (positive LR = 5.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1-8.0); (2) the symptom of paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea (positive LR = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5-4.5); (3) the sign of the third heart sound (S(3)) gallop (positive LR = 11; 95% CI, 4.9-25.0); (4) the chest radiograph showing pulmonary venous congestion (positive LR = 12.0; 95% CI, 6.8-21.0); and (5) electrocardiogram showing atrial fibrillation (positive LR = 3.8; 95% CI, 1.7-8.8). The features that best decreased the probability of heart failure were the absence of (1) past history of heart failure (negative LR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.38-0.53); (2) the symptom of dyspnea on exertion (negative LR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.35-0.67); (3) rales (negative LR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.37-0.70); (4) the chest radiograph showing cardiomegaly (negative LR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.23-0.48); and (5) any electrocardiogram abnormality (negative LR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47-0.88). A low serum BNP proved to be the most useful test (serum B-type natriuretic peptide <100 pg/mL; negative LR = 0.11; 95% CI, 0.07-0.16).
CONCLUSIONS: For dyspneic adult emergency department patients, a directed history, physical examination, chest radiograph, and electrocardiography should be performed. If the suspicion of heart failure remains, obtaining a serum BNP level may be helpful, especially for excluding heart failure.
JAMA. 2005 Oct 19;294(15):1944-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.15.1944.

心不全急性期の治療

2010年の米国心不全学会ガイドラインでの急性心不全治療の概要。
出典
imgimg
1: HFSA 2010 Comprehensive Heart Failure Practice Guideline.
著者: Heart Failure Society of America, JoAnn Lindenfeld, Nancy M Albert, John P Boehmer, Sean P Collins, Justin A Ezekowitz, Michael M Givertz, Stuart D Katz, Marc Klapholz, Debra K Moser, Joseph G Rogers, Randall C Starling, William G Stevenson, W H Wilson Tang, John R Teerlink, Mary N Walsh
雑誌名: J Card Fail. 2010 Jun;16(6):e1-194. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.04.004.
Abstract/Text: Heart failure (HF) is a syndrome characterized by high mortality, frequent hospitalization, reduced quality of life, and a complex therapeutic regimen. Knowledge about HF is accumulating so rapidly that individual clinicians may be unable to readily and adequately synthesize new information into effective strategies of care for patients with this syndrome. Trial data, though valuable, often do not give direction for individual patient management. These characteristics make HF an ideal candidate for practice guidelines. The 2010 Heart Failure Society of America comprehensive practice guideline addresses the full range of evaluation, care, and management of patients with HF.

Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.
J Card Fail. 2010 Jun;16(6):e1-194. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.04.00...

喘息の鑑別診断

喘息の鑑別に重要な疾患
出典
imgimg
1: Diagnosis of asthma in adults.
CMAJ. 2009 Nov 10;181(10):E210-20. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080006. Epub 2009 Sep 21.

COPDの病期

COPDの重症度はFEV1の予測値に対する割合で決まる。
出典
img
1: [http://goldcopd.org/gold-2017-global-strategy-diagnosis-management-prevention-copd/ Global Strategy For the Diagnosis, management and prevention of chronic obstructive Pulmonary Disease (2017 Report).]

COPD急性増悪期の治療

代表的なCOPD診療ガイドラインでのCOPD急性増悪治療概要。
 
参考文献:
[http://goldcopd.org/gold-2017-global-strategy-diagnosis-management-prevention-copd/ GOLD 2017 Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD]
出典
img
1: 著者提供

ADROP

市中肺炎を外来あるいは入院で治療するかどうかの指標
出典
imgimg
1: Comparison of severity scoring systems A-DROP and CURB-65 for community-acquired pneumonia.
著者: Yuichiro Shindo, Shinji Sato, Eiichi Maruyama, Takamasa Ohashi, Masahiro Ogawa, Kazuyoshi Imaizumi, Yoshinori Hasegawa
雑誌名: Respirology. 2008 Sep;13(5):731-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2008.01329.x.
Abstract/Text: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The initial assessment of the severity of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is important for patient management. The Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) has proposed a 6-point scale (0-5) to assess the clinical severity of CAP. The A-DROP scoring system assesses the following parameters: (i) Age (male >or= 70 years, female >or= 75 years); (ii) Dehydration (blood urea nitrogen (BUN) >or= 210 mg/L); (iii) Respiratory failure (SaO(2) 7 mmol/L (200 mg/L), respiratory rate >or= 30/min, low blood pressure (diastolic or= 65 years) proposed by the British Thoracic Society. However, validation of A-DROP has not been attempted nor has it been compared with CURB-65. The aim of this study was to confirm that A-DROP is equivalent to CURB-65 for predicting severity of CAP.
METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted of patients with CAP hospitalized at a single centre between November 2005 and January 2007. The 30-day mortality after admission was compared following assessment of severity using the A-DROP and CURB-65 scoring systems.
RESULTS: Three-hundred and twenty-nine patients were evaluated. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.846 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.790-0.903) and 0.835 (95% CI: 0.763-0.908) for A-DROP and CURB-65, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The JRS A-DROP can be used to assess severity of CAP, and gives similar results to CURB-65.
Respirology. 2008 Sep;13(5):731-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2008.01329...

心タンポナーデの身体所見。胸部X線所見、エコー所見

a:きんちゃく型の心陰影拡大
b:頚静脈怒張を認める
c:エコーフリースペースを認める
出典
img
1: Marc Eckstein and Sean O. Henderson: Thoracic Trauma. Marx: Rosen’s Emergency Medicine, 7th ed. Mosby, 2009; Figure 42-14.
img
2: Roberts:Clinical procedures in Emergency Medicine, 5th ed.Chapter16 pericardiocentesis,Diagnosis of cardiac tanponado ,Figure.16-5

COPDのリスクアセスメント

A → B → E と、増悪、入院のリスクが上がる。
参考:Global Strategy for Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of COPD: 2023 Report(GOLD2023)
出典
img
1: 著者提供

呼吸困難の鑑別1

呼吸困難の鑑別の全体的な流れを示す
出典
img
1: 改変ありSchwartzstein RM. Dyspnea Chapter 33. In Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. McGraw Hill 18th 5d

呼吸困難の鑑別2

呼吸困難の鑑別の全体的な流れを示す
出典
img
1: 改変ありSchwartzstein RM. Dyspnea Chapter 33. In Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. McGraw Hill 18th 5d

肺血栓塞栓症 診断のアルゴリズム

肺血栓塞栓症診断のための一般的な流れを示す。
出典
imgimg
1: Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Best Practice Advice From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.
著者: Ali S Raja, Jeffrey O Greenberg, Amir Qaseem, Thomas D Denberg, Nick Fitterman, Jeremiah D Schuur, Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians
雑誌名: Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 3;163(9):701-11. doi: 10.7326/M14-1772. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
Abstract/Text: DESCRIPTION: Pulmonary embolism (PE) can be a severe disease and is difficult to diagnose, given its nonspecific signs and symptoms. Because of this, testing patients with suspected acute PE has increased dramatically. However, the overuse of some tests, particularly computed tomography (CT) and plasma d-dimer measurement, may not improve care while potentially leading to patient harm and unnecessary expense.
METHODS: The literature search encompassed studies indexed by MEDLINE (1966-2014; English-language only) and included all clinical trials and meta-analyses on diagnostic strategies, decision rules, laboratory tests, and imaging studies for the diagnosis of PE. This document is not based on a formal systematic review, but instead seeks to provide practical advice based on the best available evidence and recent guidelines. The target audience for this paper is all clinicians; the target patient population is all adults, both inpatient and outpatient, suspected of having acute PE.
BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Clinicians should use validated clinical prediction rules to estimate pretest probability in patients in whom acute PE is being considered.
BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Clinicians should not obtain d-dimer measurements or imaging studies in patients with a low pretest probability of PE and who meet all Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria.
BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Clinicians should obtain a high-sensitivity d-dimer measurement as the initial diagnostic test in patients who have an intermediate pretest probability of PE or in patients with low pretest probability of PE who do not meet all Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria. Clinicians should not use imaging studies as the initial test in patients who have a low or intermediate pretest probability of PE.
BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Clinicians should use age-adjusted d-dimer thresholds (age × 10 ng/mL rather than a generic 500 ng/mL) in patients older than 50 years to determine whether imaging is warranted.
BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Clinicians should not obtain any imaging studies in patients with a d-dimer level below the age-adjusted cutoff.
BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Clinicians should obtain imaging with CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in patients with high pretest probability of PE. Clinicians should reserve ventilation-perfusion scans for patients who have a contraindication to CTPA or if CTPA is not available. Clinicians should not obtain a d-dimer measurement in patients with a high pretest probability of PE.
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 3;163(9):701-11. doi: 10.7326/M14-1772. Epub ...

検査前確率が低い場合のPE否定クライテリア(PERC)

出典
imgimg
1: Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Best Practice Advice From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.
著者: Ali S Raja, Jeffrey O Greenberg, Amir Qaseem, Thomas D Denberg, Nick Fitterman, Jeremiah D Schuur, Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians
雑誌名: Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 3;163(9):701-11. doi: 10.7326/M14-1772. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
Abstract/Text: DESCRIPTION: Pulmonary embolism (PE) can be a severe disease and is difficult to diagnose, given its nonspecific signs and symptoms. Because of this, testing patients with suspected acute PE has increased dramatically. However, the overuse of some tests, particularly computed tomography (CT) and plasma d-dimer measurement, may not improve care while potentially leading to patient harm and unnecessary expense.
METHODS: The literature search encompassed studies indexed by MEDLINE (1966-2014; English-language only) and included all clinical trials and meta-analyses on diagnostic strategies, decision rules, laboratory tests, and imaging studies for the diagnosis of PE. This document is not based on a formal systematic review, but instead seeks to provide practical advice based on the best available evidence and recent guidelines. The target audience for this paper is all clinicians; the target patient population is all adults, both inpatient and outpatient, suspected of having acute PE.
BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Clinicians should use validated clinical prediction rules to estimate pretest probability in patients in whom acute PE is being considered.
BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Clinicians should not obtain d-dimer measurements or imaging studies in patients with a low pretest probability of PE and who meet all Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria.
BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Clinicians should obtain a high-sensitivity d-dimer measurement as the initial diagnostic test in patients who have an intermediate pretest probability of PE or in patients with low pretest probability of PE who do not meet all Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria. Clinicians should not use imaging studies as the initial test in patients who have a low or intermediate pretest probability of PE.
BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Clinicians should use age-adjusted d-dimer thresholds (age × 10 ng/mL rather than a generic 500 ng/mL) in patients older than 50 years to determine whether imaging is warranted.
BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Clinicians should not obtain any imaging studies in patients with a d-dimer level below the age-adjusted cutoff.
BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Clinicians should obtain imaging with CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in patients with high pretest probability of PE. Clinicians should reserve ventilation-perfusion scans for patients who have a contraindication to CTPA or if CTPA is not available. Clinicians should not obtain a d-dimer measurement in patients with a high pretest probability of PE.
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 3;163(9):701-11. doi: 10.7326/M14-1772. Epub ...

Wells score

出典
img
1: 編集部にて作成

外頚静脈拡張

右心系負荷を示す。内頚静脈の波形は時間をかけて視診を行うことで確認できる。
出典
img
1: Lee Goldman: Approach to the Patient with Possible Cardiovascular Disease. Goldman’s Cecil Medicine, 24th ed. Saunders, 2011; Figure 50-3.