| |
著者: Laurie H Sehn, Brian Berry, Mukesh Chhanabhai, Catherine Fitzgerald, Karamjit Gill, Paul Hoskins, Richard Klasa, Kerry J Savage, Tamara Shenkier, Judy Sutherland, Randy D Gascoyne, Joseph M Connors
雑誌名: Blood. 2007 Mar 1;109(5):1857-61. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-08-038257. Epub 2006 Nov 14.
Abstract/Text
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous entity, with patients exhibiting a wide range of outcomes. The addition of rituximab to CHOP chemotherapy (R-CHOP)has led to a marked improvement in survival and has called into question the significance of previously recognized prognostic markers. Since randomized controlled trials of R-CHOP in DLBCL have included select subgroups of patients, the utility of the International Prognostic Index (IPI) has not been reassessed. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP in the province of British Columbia to assess the value of the IPI in the era of immunochemotherapy. The IPI remains predictive, but it identifies only 2 risk groups. Redistribution of the IPI factors into a revised IPI (R-IPI) provides a more clinically useful prediction of outcome. The R-IPI identifies 3 distinct prognostic groups with a very good (4-year progression-free survival [PFS] 94%, overall survival [OS] 94%), good (4-year PFS 80%, OS 79%), and poor (4-year PFS 53%, OS 55%) outcome, respectively (P < .001). The IPI (or R-IPI) no longer identifies a risk group with less than a 50% chance of survival. In the era of R-CHOP treatment, the R-IPI is a clinically useful prognostic index that may help guide treatment planning and interpretation of clinical trials.
PMID 17105812 Blood. 2007 Mar 1;109(5):1857-61. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-08-038257. Epub 2006 Nov 14.
|
