| |
著者: Takashi Kobayashi, Koji Nishizawa, Kenji Mitsumori, Keiji Ogura
雑誌名: J Urol. 2003 Oct;170(4 Pt 1):1093-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000080709.11253.08.
Abstract/Text
PURPOSE: Hematuria is absent in a significant proportion of patients with acute ureterolithiasis. We determined whether time from pain onset has any impact on the sensitivity of hematuria tests in the diagnosis of ureterolithiasis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 537 patients with suspected acute unilateral renal colic during a 29-month period with regard to the interval between pain onset and urinalysis, including the dipstick test and microscopic red blood cell count as well as other clinical findings. Although ureterolithiasis was determined by plain x-ray and ultrasonography primarily, stone absence was diagnosed by computerized tomography.
RESULTS: Ureterolithiasis was diagnosed in 452 patients (84.2%). The dipstick test had higher sensitivity (0.780 vs 0.718) but it was equivalent on ROC analysis compared with microscopic examination (area under the curve 0.696 vs 0.694, p = 0.92). Hematuria test sensitivity was 0.95, 0.83, 0.65, 0.68, 0.77, 0.86 and 0.68 on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 to 7 and 8 or more from pain onset, respectively (ANOVA p = 0.004). On logistic regression analysis including hydronephrosis grade, and stone size and location the interval between onset and urinalysis was the only independent factor affecting the incidence of negative hematuria in patients with ureterolithiasis (p = 0.03, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: The interval between pain onset and urine collection has a significant impact on the diagnostic performance of hematuria tests. The incidence of negative hematuria is highest on the days 3 and 4.
PMID 14501699 J Urol. 2003 Oct;170(4 Pt 1):1093-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000080709.11253.08.
|
