Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVE: To determine the etiologic yield in young children with single domain developmental delay (either developmental language disorder or isolated motor delay) after a specialty diagnostic evaluation.
METHODS: During an 18-month period, all children <5 years of age, who were consecutively referred to pediatric neurology or developmental pediatric clinics at a single tertiary pediatric center, were prospectively enrolled. Etiologic yield was determined after completion of clinical assessments and selected laboratory studies requested by the evaluating physician.
RESULTS: Seventy-two children (60 boys) were found to have a developmental language disorder, and 22 children (11 boys) had isolated motor delay, of whom 6 had an associated diagnosis of cerebral palsy. An etiologic diagnosis was rarely made in the children with developmental language disorder (3/72, 4.1%). Laboratory investigations (metabolic, cytogenetic, imaging), aside from audiometry, were uniformly uninformative. In those children with isolated motor delay, an etiology was apparent in more than half (13/22, 59%). Slightly more than half (7/13, 54%) of etiologies identified in this group were potentially preventable. Successful etiologic determination in children with motor delay often had an impact on recurrence risk estimation, medical management, or specific therapy offered (8/13, 62%). The presence of physical findings on initial assessment was found to be highly predictive of successful etiologic determination in children with isolated motor delay (13/17 vs 0/5, P =.002).
CONCLUSION: Etiologic yield differs substantially according to the subgroup of single domain developmental delay.
Abstract/Text
BACKGROUND: Better language outcomes are reported for preschool children with hearing impairment (HI) diagnosed very early, irrespective of severity. However, population studies of older children are required to substantiate longer term benefits of early detection.
AIMS: To study impact of age of diagnosis and severity of HI in a population cohort of 7-8 year old children.
METHODS: Eighty eight 7-8 year old children born in Victoria, who were (a) fitted with hearing aids for congenital HI by 4.5 years and (b) did not have intellectual or major physical disability were studied. Main outcome measures were Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF) and Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT). Predictors were pure tone average (0.5, 1, 2 kHz) in better ear at diagnosis and age at diagnosis. Marginal (adjusted) means were estimated with general linear models.
RESULTS: Response rate was 67% (n = 89; 53 boys). Mean age at diagnosis was 21.6 months (SD 14.4); 21% had mild, 34% moderate, 21% severe, and 24% profound HI; mean non-verbal IQ was 104.6 (SD 16.7). Mean total CELF score was 76.7 (SD 21.4) and mean PPVT score 78.1 (SD 18.1). Age of diagnosis, adjusted for severity and IQ, did not contribute to language scores. In contrast, adjusted mean CELF and PPVT language scores fell sequentially with increasing severity of HI.
CONCLUSIONS: More severe HI, but not later diagnosis, was strongly related to poorer language outcomes at 7-8 years. Further systematic study is needed to understand why children with hearing impairment have good or poor outcomes.
Abstract/Text
OBJECTIVE: To compare the language abilities of earlier- and later-identified deaf and hard-of-hearing children.
METHOD: We compared the receptive and expressive language abilities of 72 deaf or hard-of-hearing children whose hearing losses were identified by 6 months of age with 78 children whose hearing losses were identified after the age of 6 months. All of the children received early intervention services within an average of 2 months after identification. The participants' receptive and expressive language abilities were measured using the Minnesota Child Development Inventory.
RESULTS: Children whose hearing losses were identified by 6 months of age demonstrated significantly better language scores than children identified after 6 months of age. For children with normal cognitive abilities, this language advantage was found across all test ages, communication modes, degrees of hearing loss, and socioeconomic strata. It also was independent of gender, minority status, and the presence or absence of additional disabilities.
CONCLUSIONS: Significantly better language development was associated with early identification of hearing loss and early intervention. There was no significant difference between the earlier- and later-identified groups on several variables frequently associated with language ability in deaf and hard-of-hearing children. Thus, the variable on which the two groups differed (age of identification and intervention) must be considered a potential explanation for the language advantage documented in the earlier-identified group.
Abstract/Text
BACKGROUND: Children with bilateral permanent hearing impairment often have impaired language and speech abilities. However, the effects of universal newborn screening for permanent bilateral childhood hearing impairment and the effects of confirmation of hearing impairment by nine months of age on subsequent verbal abilities are uncertain.
METHODS: We studied 120 children with bilateral permanent hearing impairment identified from a large birth cohort in southern England, at a mean of 7.9 years of age. Of the 120 children, 61 were born during periods with universal newborn screening and 57 had hearing impairment that was confirmed by nine months of age. The primary outcomes were language as compared with nonverbal ability and speech expressed as z scores (the number of standard deviations by which the score differed from the mean score among 63 age-matched children with normal hearing), adjusted for the severity of the hearing impairment and for maternal education.
RESULTS: Confirmation of hearing impairment by nine months of age was associated with higher adjusted mean z scores for language as compared with nonverbal ability (adjusted mean difference for receptive language, 0.82; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.31 to 1.33; and adjusted mean difference for expressive language, 0.70; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.13 to 1.26). Birth during periods with universal newborn screening was also associated with higher adjusted z scores for receptive language as compared with nonverbal ability (adjusted mean difference, 0.60; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.07 to 1.13), although the z scores for expressive language as compared with nonverbal ability were not significantly higher. Speech scores did not differ significantly between those who were exposed to newborn screening or early confirmation and those who were not.
CONCLUSIONS: Early detection of childhood hearing impairment was associated with higher scores for language but not for speech in midchildhood.
Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.
