| |
著者: R A Freedman, E L Alderman, L T Sheffield, M Saporito, L D Fisher
雑誌名: J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Jul;10(1):73-80.
Abstract/Text
The onset of bundle branch block during acute myocardial infarction is indicative of ischemia in the distribution of the left anterior descending coronary artery. However, whether patients with chronic coronary artery disease and bundle branch block have a predominance of left anterior descending artery lesions is not known. Similarly, the prognostic implications of bundle branch block have been studied primarily in the setting of acute myocardial infarction, and the independent prognostic implications of bundle branch block in patients with chronic coronary artery disease are not known. The electrocardiograms (ECGs) of 15,609 patients with chronic coronary artery disease who underwent coronary and left ventricular angiography as part of the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) were reviewed, and 522 patients with bundle branch block were identified. Patients with bundle branch block had both more extensive coronary artery disease and worse left ventricular function than did patients without bundle branch block. However, no particular location of coronary artery stenosis or left ventricular wall motion abnormality predominated in patients with bundle branch block. During a follow-up period of 4.9 +/- 1.3 years, 2,386 patients died. Actuarial probability of mortality at 2 years in patients with left bundle branch block was more than five times that in patients without bundle branch block (p less than 0.0001), and in patients with right bundle branch block the mortality rate was approximately twice that in patients without bundle branch block (p less than 0.0001). Stepwise Cox regression analysis showed that left bundle branch block, but not right bundle branch block, was a strong predictor of mortality, independent of degree of heart failure, extent of coronary disease and other variables (p less than 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
PMID 3597997 J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Jul;10(1):73-80.
|
