今日の臨床サポート

腐食性食道炎、潰瘍

著者: 八島一夫 鳥取大学 機能病態内科学

監修: 木下芳一 兵庫県立姫路循環器病センター/製鉄記念広畑病院

著者校正/監修レビュー済:2019/09/06
患者向け説明資料

概要・推奨   

  1. 腐食性食道炎、潰瘍の経過は、腐食性物質の種類、濃度、量、pH、粘性、接触時間などにより決まるため、受傷時の状況把握を行うことは重要である(推奨度1)。
  1. 急性期の病状把握のためCT、上部消化管内視鏡検査は必要である(推奨度2)。
  1. 受傷数日後から2週間程度は内視鏡検査を避けるべきである(推奨度2)。
  1. 閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要とな
  1. 閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧に
  1. 閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が
薬剤監修について:
オーダー内の薬剤用量は日本医科大学付属病院 薬剤部 部長 伊勢雄也 以下、林太祐、渡邉裕次、井ノ口岳洋、梅田将光による疑義照会のプロセスを実施、疑義照会の対象については著者の方による再確認を実施しております。
※薬剤中分類、用法、同効薬、診療報酬は、エルゼビアが独自に作成した薬剤情報であり、
著者により作成された情報ではありません。
尚、用法は添付文書より、同効薬は、薬剤師監修のもとで作成しております。
※薬剤情報の(適外/適内/⽤量内/⽤量外/㊜)等の表記は、エルゼビアジャパン編集部によって記載日時にレセプトチェックソフトなどで確認し作成しております。ただし、これらの記載は、実際の保険適用の査定において保険適用及び保険適用外と判断されることを保証するものではありません。また、検査薬、輸液、血液製剤、全身麻酔薬、抗癌剤等の薬剤は保険適用の記載の一部を割愛させていただいています。
(詳細はこちらを参照)
著者のCOI(Conflicts of Interest)開示:
八島一夫 : 特に申告事項無し[2021年]
監修:木下芳一 : 講演料(アストラゼネカ,武田,大塚,第一三共)[2021年]

改訂のポイント:
  1. 定期レビューを行い、診断・治療方針について加筆修正を行った。

病態・疫学・診察

疾患情報(疫学・病態)  
  1. 腐食性食道炎とは、組織傷害性の強い化学物質の飲用によって起こる食道壁の損傷である。
  1. 原因としては、小児は洗剤などの誤飲の場合が多く、成人では自殺目的の服用が大部分を占める。欧米では小児の誤飲が原因の約80%を占め、死亡率は13.6%とされている[1][2][3][4]。一般的な腐食性物質として、酸ではトイレ用洗剤などに含まれる塩酸、硫酸など、アルカリでは配水管洗剤、漂白剤などに含まれる水酸化ナトリウム(苛性ソーダ)、次亜塩素酸ナトリウムなどがある。その他、重金属、農薬、フェノール、ホルムアルデヒドなどの飲用によるものもある。
  1. 食道壁の損傷の程度は、腐食性物質の種類、濃度、量、pH、粘性、接触時間に左右される。
  1. 酸は粘膜傷害が比較的表面にとどまることが多いが、アルカリは強い吸湿性および鹸化・蛋白融解作用のため病変が深部まで及び、瘢痕狭窄を来しやすい。
  1. 臨床経過は受傷後の時期により3期に分類される。(表<図表>
  1. 受傷後3週以降に組織の線維化と拘縮が始まり食道狭窄が徐々に進行する。受傷8カ月以内に狭窄が完成するといわれている。
 
  1. 腐食性食道炎、潰瘍の経過は、腐食性物質の種類、濃度、量、pH、粘性、接触時間などにより決まるため、受傷時の状況把握を行うことは重要である(推奨度1)。
  1. 酸は口腔内ですぐに傷害が起きるため摂取困難であることが多く、また表面組織に凝固壊死を起こすため深部への浸透は少ない。アルカリは融解壊死を起こすため傷害が深部へ及びやすい。
問診・診察のポイント  
  1. 腐食性物質の種類、濃度、量、pH、粘性、接触時間などの受傷時の状況を把握する。

今なら12か月分の料金で14ヶ月利用できます(個人契約、期間限定キャンペーン)

11月30日(火)までにお申込みいただくと、
通常12ヵ月の使用期間が2ヶ月延長となり、14ヵ月ご利用いただけるようになります。

詳しくはクリック
本サイトの知的財産権は全てエルゼビアまたはコンテンツのライセンサーに帰属します。私的利用及び別途規定されている場合を除き、本サイトの利用はいかなる許諾を与えるものでもありません。 本サイト、そのコンテンツ、製品およびサービスのご利用は、お客様ご自身の責任において行ってください。本サイトの利用に基づくいかなる損害についても、エルゼビアは一切の責任及び賠償義務を負いません。 また、本サイトの利用を以て、本サイト利用者は、本サイトの利用に基づき第三者に生じるいかなる損害についても、エルゼビアを免責することに合意したことになります。  本サイトを利用される医学・医療提供者は、独自の臨床的判断を行使するべきです。本サイト利用者の判断においてリスクを正当なものとして受け入れる用意がない限り、コンテンツにおいて提案されている検査または処置がなされるべきではありません。 医学の急速な進歩に鑑み、エルゼビアは、本サイト利用者が診断方法および投与量について、独自に検証を行うことを推奨いたします。

文献 

著者: S A Zargar, R Kochhar, B Nagi, S Mehta, S K Mehta
雑誌名: Gastroenterology. 1989 Sep;97(3):702-7.
Abstract/Text We have prospectively evaluated 41 patients who ingested acid for location, extent, severity, and outcome of the injury to the upper gastrointestinal tract. The injury was assessed within 36 h of acid intake by endoscopy or surgery, or at autopsy. Symptoms and signs were unreliable in predicting the extent and severity of injury. The degree of burns was classified as follows: grade 0 in 2 patients, grade 1 in 3, grade 2 in 16, and grade 3 in 20. Esophageal injury was seen in 87.8% of the patients, gastric injury in 85.4%, and duodenal injury in 34.1%. All patients with grade 0, 1, and 2a injury recovered without sequelae. Acute complications occurred in 39.1% of the cases, and death in 12.2%. It is significant that all such patients had grade 3 burns. Five of the 8 patients with grade 2b injury and all survivors of grade 3 injury developed esophageal or gastric cicatrization, or both, which subsequently needed endoscopic or surgical treatment. We find that endoscopy is not only the tool of choice for diagnosis in such cases but also aids in deciding upon treatment and prognosis. We conclude that acid injury of the upper gastrointestinal tract is a very serious condition that affects the esophagus and stomach equally and results in high morbidity and mortality.

PMID 2753330  Gastroenterology. 1989 Sep;97(3):702-7.
著者: S A Zargar, R Kochhar, B Nagi, S Mehta, S K Mehta
雑誌名: Am J Gastroenterol. 1992 Mar;87(3):337-41.
Abstract/Text We have prospectively studied 31 patients who ingested strong alkalis for location, extent, severity, and outcome of the injury to the upper gastrointestinal tract. Alkalis ingested were sodium hydroxide (n = 28) and potassium hydroxide (n = 3). The injury was assessed within 36 h of alkali intake by endoscopy or surgery, or at autopsy. Symptoms and signs did not give a reliable forecast of the extent and severity of injury. The corrosive burns were classified as grade 2a in six patients, grade 2b in eight, and grade 3 in 17. The esophagus was injured in all patients, the stomach in 93.5%, and the duodenum in 29.6%. Acute complications occurred in 32.3% of the patients and death in 12.9%; all but one of such patients had grade 3 burns. All patients with 2a injury recovered without sequelae. Four of the eight patients with grade 2b injury and all survivors of grade 3 injury developed esophageal or gastric cicatrization, or both, which needed endoscopic or surgical treatment. We find endoscopy is not only a safe and reliable tool for diagnosis in such patients, but also is of importance in treatment and prognosis. We conclude that ingestion of strong alkalis is a very serious condition that inflicts severe contiguous injury to the esophagus and stomach and results in high morbidity and mortality.

PMID 1539568  Am J Gastroenterol. 1992 Mar;87(3):337-41.
著者: Mircea Chirica, Luigi Bonavina, Michael D Kelly, Emile Sarfati, Pierre Cattan
雑誌名: Lancet. 2017 May 20;389(10083):2041-2052. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30313-0. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
Abstract/Text Corrosive ingestion is a rare but potentially devastating event and, despite the availability of effective preventive public health strategies, injuries continue to occur. Most clinicians have limited personal experience and rely on guidelines; however, uncertainty persists about best clinical practice. Ingestions range from mild cases with no injury to severe cases with full thickness necrosis of the oesophagus and stomach. CT scan is superior to traditional endoscopy for stratification of patients to emergency resection or observation. Oesophageal stricture is a common consequence of ingestion and newer stents show some promise; however, the place of endoscopic stenting for corrosive strictures is yet to be defined. We summarise the evidence to provide a plan for managing these potentially life-threatening injuries and discuss the areas where further research is required to improve outcomes.

Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PMID 28045663  Lancet. 2017 May 20;389(10083):2041-2052. doi: 10.1016/・・・
著者: Hyun Ho Ryu, Kyung Woon Jeung, Byung Kook Lee, Jun Hwan Uhm, Young Hun Park, Min Ho Shin, Hyun Lee Kim, Tag Heo, Yong Il Min
雑誌名: Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010 Feb;48(2):137-42. doi: 10.3109/15563650903585929.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to test the utility of our computed tomography (CT) grading system, compared with endoscopy, for association with the development of esophageal stricture in patients with caustic ingestion.
METHODS: This retrospective case series involved 49 patients with caustic ingestion from 1998 to 2009. The degree of esophageal damage was graded using a scoring system based on the extent of esophageal wall edema and the damage in adjacent tissue as seen on thoracoabdominal CT scans. The presence of esophageal stricture was established by esophagography. Diagnostic performance was compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the grading system.
RESULTS: The CT grading score results showed that grade III was the most common injury (20 cases, 40.8%), followed by grade IV (14 cases, 28.6%), grade II (9 cases, 18.4%), and grade I (6 cases, 12.2%). In addition, damage to the esophagus was significantly correlated with esophageal stricture when the extent of damage approached grades III and IV (p < 0.001). The CT grading system for esophageal stricture resulted in a slightly larger area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.90) compared with endoscopic grading system (0.79). The sensitivity and specificity of CT grading system were moderately higher than those of endoscopic grading system.
CONCLUSION: Assessment of the degree of esophageal damage using CT, a noninvasive modality, in patients who visit the emergency department following caustic ingestion should be useful in estimating the occurrence of complications including esophageal stricture.

PMID 20199130  Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010 Feb;48(2):137-42. doi: 10.31・・・
著者: J M Howell, W C Dalsey, F W Hartsell, C A Butzin
雑誌名: Am J Emerg Med. 1992 Sep;10(5):421-5.
Abstract/Text Caustic esophageal injury causes substantial morbidity and mortality. However, the use of corticosteroids to treat this problem has been evaluated in a limited number of studies because adequate sample size is difficult to obtain. We analyzed 361 subjects with corrosive esophageal injury derived from 10 retrospective and three prospective publications. We divided cases into those treated with corticosteroids and antibiotics (T) and those that received neither modality (NT) based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Forty-one percent of NT cases developed esophageal stricture and 19% of T cases developed this complication (P less than .01). There were no reported strictures among 72 first-degree esophageal burns (combined T and NT cases). The T group contained 54 strictures among 228 patients (24%) with either second- or third-degree burns. The NT group of 25 patients with the same burn severity suffered 13 strictures (52%) (P less than .01). Reports of death and gastrointestinal hemorrhage did not increase among steroid-treated patients. We do not recommend corticosteroid therapy for first-degree esophageal injuries. However, this therapy may be useful in preventing strictures among patients with second- or third-degree corrosive esophageal burns.

PMID 1642705  Am J Emerg Med. 1992 Sep;10(5):421-5.
著者: Asada Methasate, Varut Lohsiriwat
雑誌名: World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Oct 16;10(10):274-282. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i10.274.
Abstract/Text Caustic injury of the esophagus is a problematic condition challenging endoscopists worldwide. Although the caustic agents and motives are different among countries and age groups, endoscopy still plays an invaluable role in diagnosis and treatment. Endoscopy can determine the severity of caustic ingestion which is of great importance in choosing appropriate treatment. However, some aspects of endoscopy in diagnosis of caustic injury remain controversial. Whether or not all patients need endoscopy, when to perform endoscopy and how to assess the severity are just some examples of these controversies. Due to lack of randomized controlled trials, many findings and suggestions are inconclusive. Computerized tomography scan of the chest and abdomen gains popularity in assessing the severity of caustic injury and avoiding unnecessary surgery. If esophageal stricture eventually develops, endoscopic dilatation is a mainstay. Maneuvers such as steroid injection and esophageal stent may be used in a refractory stricture. Nevertheless, some patients have to undergo surgery in spite of vigorous attempts with esophageal dilatation. To date, caustic injury remains a difficult situation. This article reviews all aspects of caustic injury of the esophagus focusing on endoscopic role. Pre-endoscopic management, endoscopy and its technique in acute and late phase of caustic injury including the endoscopic management of refractory stricture, and the treatment outcomes following each endoscopic intervention are thoroughly discussed. Finally, the role of endoscopy in the long term follow-up of patients with esophageal caustic injury is addressed.

PMID 30364838  World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Oct 16;10(10):274-282・・・

ページ上部に戻る

戻る

さらなるご利用にはご登録が必要です。

こちらよりご契約または優待日間無料トライアルお申込みをお願いします。

(※トライアルご登録は1名様につき、一度となります)


ご契約の場合はご招待された方だけのご優待特典があります。

以下の優待コードを入力いただくと、

契約期間が通常12ヵ月のところ、14ヵ月ご利用いただけます。

優待コード: (利用期限:まで)

ご契約はこちらから