Scott M Stevens, Scott C Woller, Kenneth A Bauer, Raj Kasthuri, Mary Cushman, Michael Streiff, Wendy Lim, James D Douketis
Guidance for the evaluation and treatment of hereditary and acquired thrombophilia.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016 Jan;41(1):154-64. doi: 10.1007/s11239-015-1316-1.
Abstract/Text
Thrombophilias are hereditary and/or acquired conditions that predispose patients to thrombosis. Testing for thrombophilia is commonly performed in patients with venous thrombosis and their relatives; however such testing usually does not provide information that impacts management and may result in harm. This manuscript, initiated by the Anticoagulation Forum, provides clinical guidance for thrombophilia testing in five clinical situations: following 1) provoked venous thromboembolism, 2) unprovoked venous thromboembolism; 3) in relatives of patients with thrombosis, 4) in female relatives of patients with thrombosis considering estrogen use; and 5) in female relatives of patients with thrombosis who are considering pregnancy. Additionally, guidance is provided regarding the timing of thrombophilia testing. The role of thrombophilia testing in arterial thrombosis and for evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss is not addressed. Statements are based on existing guidelines and consensus expert opinion where guidelines are lacking. We recommend that thrombophilia testing not be performed in most situations. When performed, it should be used in a highly selective manner, and only in circumstances where the information obtained will influence a decision important to the patient, and outweigh the potential risks of testing. Testing should not be performed during acute thrombosis or during the initial (3-month) period of anticoagulation.
Willem M Lijfering, Jan-Leendert P Brouwer, Nic J G M Veeger, Ivan Bank, Michiel Coppens, Saskia Middeldorp, Karly Hamulyák, Martin H Prins, Harry R Büller, Jan van der Meer
Selective testing for thrombophilia in patients with first venous thrombosis: results from a retrospective family cohort study on absolute thrombotic risk for currently known thrombophilic defects in 2479 relatives.
Blood. 2009 May 21;113(21):5314-22. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-10-184879. Epub 2009 Jan 12.
Abstract/Text
Thrombophilia screening is controversial. In a retrospective family cohort, where probands had thrombosis and a thrombophilic defect, 2479 relatives were tested for thrombophilia. In antithrombin-, protein C-, and protein S-deficient relatives, annual incidences of venous thrombosis were 1.77% (95% CI, 1.14-2.60), 1.52% (95% CI, 1.06-2.11), and 1.90% (95% CI, 1.32-2.64), respectively, at a median age of 29 years and a positive family history of more than 20% symptomatic relatives. In relatives with factor V (FV) Leiden, prothrombin 20210G>A, or high FVIII levels, these were 0.49% (95% CI, 0.39-0.60), 0.34% (95% CI, 0.22-0.49), and 0.49% (95% CI, 0.41-0.51), respectively. High FIX, FXI, and TAFI, and hyperhomocysteinemia were not independent risk factors. Annual incidence of major bleeding in antithrombin-, protein C-, or protein S-deficient relatives on anticoagulants was 0.29% (95% CI, 0.03-1.04). Cumulative recurrence rates in relatives with antithrombin, protein C, or protein S deficiency were 19% at 2 years, 40% at 5 years, and 55% at 10 years. In relatives with FV Leiden, prothrombin 20210G>A, or high levels FVIII, these were 7%, 11%, and 25%, respectively. Considering its clinical implications, thrombophilia testing should address hereditary deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C, and protein S in patients with first venous thrombosis at young age and/or a strong family history of venous thrombosis.
Paul D Stein, Fadi Kayali, Ronald E Olson, Creagh E Milford
Pulmonary thromboembolism in Asians/Pacific Islanders in the United States: analysis of data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey and the United States Bureau of the Census.
Am J Med. 2004 Apr 1;116(7):435-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.11.020.
Abstract/Text
PURPOSE: To assess the rate of diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and venous thromboembolism; the incidence in hospitalized patients; and mortality from pulmonary embolism among Asians/Pacific Islanders in the United States.
METHODS: The number of patients discharged from hospitals with a diagnostic code for pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis from 1990 through 1999 was obtained from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Population estimates and deaths from pulmonary embolism from 1990 through 1998 were obtained from the United States Bureau of the Census.
RESULTS: Rate ratios of 10-year age-adjusted rates of diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and venous thromboembolism comparing Asians/Pacific Islanders with whites and African Americans ranged from 0.16 to 0.21. Rate ratios comparing incidences in hospitalized patients ranged from 0.32 to 0.42. The age-adjusted rate ratio of mortality in "others" (which included Asians/Pacific Islanders) was 0.29 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01 to 0.87) compared with whites and 0.14 (95% CI: 0.0 to 0.58) compared with African Americans.
CONCLUSION: Rates of deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and venous thromboembolism; incidences in hospitalized patients; and the mortality rate from pulmonary embolism were markedly lower in Asians/Pacific Islanders than in whites and African Americans. Clinical assessment of the prior probability of venous thromboembolic disease at the bedside should probably be adjusted based on these ethnic differences.
Frederick A Spencer, Cathy Emery, Darleen Lessard, Frederick Anderson, Sri Emani, Jayashri Aragam, Richard C Becker, Robert J Goldberg
The Worcester Venous Thromboembolism study: a population-based study of the clinical epidemiology of venous thromboembolism.
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jul;21(7):722-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00458.x.
Abstract/Text
BACKGROUND: While there have been marked advances in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for venous thromboembolism, our understanding of its clinical epidemiology is based on studies conducted more than a decade ago.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this observational study was to describe the incidence and attack rates of venous thromboembolism in residents of the Worcester Statistical Metropolitan Area in 1999. We also describe demographic and clinical characteristics, management strategies, and associated hospital and 30-day outcomes.
DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: The medical records of all residents from Worcester, MA (2000 census=477,800), diagnosed with International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9) codes consistent with possible venous thromboembolism during 1999 were independently validated, classified, and reviewed by trained abstractors.
RESULTS: A total of 587 subjects were enrolled with validated venous thromboembolism. The incidence and attack rates of venous thromboembolism were 104 and 128 per 100,000 population, respectively. Three quarters of patients developed their venous thromboembolism in the outpatient setting - a substantial proportion of these patients had undergone recent surgery or had a recent prior hospitalization. Less than half of the patients received anticoagulant prophylaxis during high-risk periods before their venous thromboembolism. Thirty-day rates of venous thromboembolism recurrence, major bleeding, and mortality were 4.8%, 7.7%, and 6.6%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: These data provide insights into recent incidence and attack rates, changing patient profiles, management strategies, and subsequent outcomes in patients with venous thromboembolism. The underutilization of prophylaxis before venous thromboembolism, and relatively high 30-day recurrence rates, suggest a continued need for the improvement of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and management in the community.
F E Preston, F R Rosendaal, I D Walker, E Briët, E Berntorp, J Conard, J Fontcuberta, M Makris, G Mariani, W Noteboom, I Pabinger, C Legnani, I Scharrer, S Schulman, F J van der Meer
Increased fetal loss in women with heritable thrombophilia.
Lancet. 1996 Oct 5;348(9032):913-6.
Abstract/Text
BACKGROUND: A successful outcome of pregnancy requires an efficient uteroplacental vascular system. Since this system may be compromised by disorders of haemostasis associated with a prothrombotic state, we postulated that maternal thrombophilia might be a risk factor for fetal loss. We studied the relation between heritable thrombophilic defects and fetal loss in a cohort of women with factor V Leiden or deficiency of antithrombin, protein C, or protein S.
METHODS: We studied 1384 women enrolled in the European Prospective Cohort on Thrombophilia (EPCOT). Of 843 women with thrombophilia 571 had 1524 pregnancies; of 541 control women 395 had 1019 pregnancies. The controls were partners of male members of the EPCOT cohort or acquaintances of cases. We analysed the frequencies of miscarriage (fetal loss at or before 28 weeks of gestation) and stillbirth (fetal loss after 28 weeks of gestation) jointly and separately.
FINDINGS: The risk of fetal loss was increased in women with thrombophilia (168/571 vs 93/395; odds ratio 1.35 [95% Cl 1.01-1.82]). The odds ratio was higher for stillbirth than for miscarriage (3.6 [1.4-9.4] vs 1.27 [0.94-1.71]). The highest odds ratio for stillbirth was in women with combined defects (14.3 [2.4-86.0]) compared with 5.2 (1.5-18.1) in antithrombin deficiency, 2.3 (0.6-8.3) in protein-C deficiency, 3.3 (1.0-11.3) in protein-S deficiency, and 2.0 (0.5-7.7) with factor V Leiden. The corresponding odds ratios for miscarriage in these subgroups were 0.8 (0.2-3.6), 1.7 (1.0-2.8), 1.4 (0.9-2.2), 1.2 (0.7-1.9), and 0.9 (0.5-1.5). Significantly more pregnancy terminations had been done in women with thrombophilia than in controls (odds ratio 2.9 [1.8-4.8]); this discrepancy was apparent in nine of 11 participating centres and for all thrombophilia subgroups.
INTERPRETATION: Women with familial thrombophilia, especially those with combined defects or antithrombin deficiency, have an increased risk of fetal loss, particularly stillbirth. Our findings have important implications for therapy and provide a rationale for clinical trials of thromboprophylaxis for affected women with recurrent fetal loss.
T Sakata, A Okamoto, T Mannami, H Matsuo, T Miyata
Protein C and antithrombin deficiency are important risk factors for deep vein thrombosis in Japanese.
J Thromb Haemost. 2004 Mar;2(3):528-30.
Abstract/Text
T Sakata, A Okamoto, T Mannami, H Tomoike, T Miyata
Prevalence of protein S deficiency in the Japanese general population: the Suita Study.
J Thromb Haemost. 2004 Jun;2(6):1012-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00742.x.
Abstract/Text
Günalp Uzun, Karina Althaus, Stefanie Hammer, Tamam Bakchoul
Assessment and Monitoring of Coagulation in Patients with COVID-19: A Review of Current Literature.
Hamostaseologie. 2022 Dec;42(6):409-419. doi: 10.1055/a-1755-8676. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
Abstract/Text
Coagulation abnormalities are common in patients with COVID-19 and associated with high morbidity and mortality. It became a daily challenge to navigate through these abnormal laboratory findings and deliver the best possible treatment to the patients. The unique character of COVID-19-induced coagulopathy necessitates not only a dynamic follow-up of the patients in terms of hemostatic findings but also the introduction of new diagnostic methods to determine the overall function of the coagulation system in real time. After the recognition of the high risk of thromboembolism in COVID-19, several professional societies published their recommendations regarding anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19. This review summarizes common hemostatic findings in COVID-19 patients and presents the societal recommendations regarding the use of coagulation laboratory findings in clinical decision-making. Although several studies have investigated coagulation parameters in patients with COVID-19, the methodological shortcomings of published studies as well as the differences in employed anticoagulation regimens that have changed over time, depending on national and international guidelines, limit the applicability of these findings in other clinical settings. Accordingly, evidence-based recommendations for diagnostics during acute COVID-19 infection are still lacking. Future studies should verify the role of coagulation parameters as well as viscoelastic methods in the management of patients with COVID-19.
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Irene D Bezemer, Felix J M van der Meer, Jeroen C J Eikenboom, Frits R Rosendaal, Carine J M Doggen
The value of family history as a risk indicator for venous thrombosis.
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Mar 23;169(6):610-5. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.589.
Abstract/Text
BACKGROUND: A positive family history of venous thrombosis may reflect the presence of genetic risk factors. Once a risk factor has been identified, it is not known whether family history is of additional value in predicting an individual's risk. We studied the contribution of family history to the risk of venous thrombosis in relation to known risk factors.
METHODS: In the Multiple Environmental and Genetic Assessment of risk factors for venous thrombosis, a population-based case-control study, we collected blood samples and information about family history and environmental triggers from 1605 patients with a first venous thrombosis and 2159 control subjects.
RESULTS: A total of 505 patients (31.5%) and 373 controls (17.3%) reported having 1 or more first-degree relatives with a history of venous thrombosis. A positive family history increased the risk of venous thrombosis more than 2-fold (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 2.2 [1.9-2.6]) and up to 4-fold (3.9 [2.7-5.7]) when more than 1 relative was affected. Family history corresponded poorly with known genetic risk factors. Both in those with and without genetic or environmental risk factors, family history remained associated with venous thrombosis. The risk increased with the number of factors identified; for those with a genetic and environmental risk factor and a positive family history, the risk was about 64-fold higher than for those with no known risk factor and a negative family history.
CONCLUSIONS: Family history is a risk indicator for a first venous thrombosis, regardless of the other risk factors identified. In clinical practice, family history may be more useful for risk assessment than thrombophilia testing.
M J Kupferminc, A Eldor, N Steinman, A Many, A Bar-Am, A Jaffa, G Fait, J B Lessing
Increased frequency of genetic thrombophilia in women with complications of pregnancy.
N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 7;340(1):9-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901073400102.
Abstract/Text
BACKGROUND: Obstetrical complications such as severe preeclampsia, abruptio placentae, fetal growth retardation, and stillbirth are associated with intervillous or spiral-artery thrombosis and inadequate placental perfusion. Whether these complications are associated with an increased frequency of thrombophilic mutations is not known.
METHODS: We studied 110 women who had one of the above-mentioned obstetrical complications and 110 women who had one or more normal pregnancies. The women were tested several days after delivery for the mutation of guanine to adenine at nucleotide 1691 [corrected] in the factor V gene (factor V Leiden), the mutation of cytosine to thymine at nucleotide 677 in the gene encoding methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, and the mutation of guanine to adenine at nucleotide 20210 in the prothrombin gene. Two to three months after delivery the women were tested for deficiency of protein C, protein S, or antithrombin III and for the presence of anticardiolipin antibodies.
RESULTS: The mutation at nucleotide 1691 [corrected] in the factor V gene was detected in 22 of the women with obstetrical complications and in 7 of the women with normal pregnancies (20 percent and 6 percent, respectively; P=0.003). Twenty-four women with complications, as compared with nine women without complications, were homozygous for the C677T mutation in the gene encoding methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (22 percent and 8 percent, respectively; P=0.005). The G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene was found in 11 women with complications as compared with 3 women without complications (10 percent and 3 percent, respectively; P=0.03). Overall, 57 women with obstetrical complications had a thrombophilic mutation, as compared with 19 women with normal pregnancies (52 percent and 17 percent, respectively; P<0.001). Deficiency of protein S, protein C, or antithrombin III or anticardiolipin antibodies were detected in an additional 14 women with complications, as compared with 1 woman with a normal pregnancy (13 percent and 1 percent, respectively; P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Women with serious obstetrical complications have an increased incidence of mutations predisposing them to thrombosis and other inherited and acquired forms of thrombophilia.
Gary H Lyman
Venous thromboembolism in the patient with cancer: focus on burden of disease and benefits of thromboprophylaxis.
Cancer. 2011 Apr 1;117(7):1334-49. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25714. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
Abstract/Text
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. The risk of VTE varies over the natural history of cancer, with the highest risk occurring during hospitalization and after disease recurrence. Patient and disease characteristics are associated with further increased risk of VTE in this setting. Specific factors include cancer type (eg, pancreatic cancer, brain cancer, lymphoma) and the presence of metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. VTE is a significant predictor of increased mortality during the first year among all types and stages of cancer, with metastatic disease reported to be the strongest predictor of mortality. VTE is also associated with early death in ambulatory patients with cancer. These data highlight the need for close monitoring, prompt treatment, and appropriate preventive strategies for VTE in patients with cancer. The American Society of Clinical Oncology and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network have issued guidelines regarding the prophylaxis and treatment of patients with cancer. This review summarizes the impact of VTE on patients with cancer, the effects of VTE on clinical outcomes, the importance of thromboprophylaxis in this population, relevant ongoing clinical trials examining the prevention of VTE, and new pharmacologic treatment options.
Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society.
P Prandoni, A W Lensing, H R Büller, A Cogo, M H Prins, A M Cattelan, S Cuppini, F Noventa, J W ten Cate
Deep-vein thrombosis and the incidence of subsequent symptomatic cancer.
N Engl J Med. 1992 Oct 15;327(16):1128-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210153271604.
Abstract/Text
BACKGROUND: In contrast to the established relation between overt cancer and subsequent venous thromboembolism, it is unclear whether symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis is associated with a risk of subsequent overt malignant disease.
METHODS: Two hundred sixty consecutive patients with symptomatic, venographically proved deep-vein thrombosis were enrolled in a study, of whom 250 were followed during a two-year period. Among those assessed during follow-up, the incidence of subsequently detected cancer in the 105 patients with secondary venous thrombosis (i.e., thrombosis associated with a well-recognized risk factor other than cancer) was compared with the incidence of cancer in the 145 patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis.
RESULTS: Routine examination at the time of diagnosis of the venous thrombosis revealed cancer in 5 of the 153 enrolled patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis (3.3 percent) and in none of the 107 enrolled patients with secondary venous thrombosis. During follow-up, overt cancer developed in 2 of the 105 patients with secondary venous thrombosis (1.9 percent) and in 11 of the 145 patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis (7.6 percent; odds ratio, 2.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 5.2; P = 0.043). Of the 145 patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis, 35 had confirmed recurrent thromboembolism. Overt cancer subsequently developed in 6 of the 35 (17.1 percent). The incidence of cancer in the patients with recurrent idiopathic venous thrombosis was higher than that in the patients with secondary venous thrombosis (P = 0.008; odds ratio, 9.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 52.2) or in the patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis that did not recur (P = 0.024; odds ratio, 4.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 15.3).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a statistically significant and clinically important association between idiopathic venous thrombosis and the subsequent development of clinically overt cancer, especially among patients in whom venous thromboembolism recurs during follow-up.
Marc Carrier, Alejandro Lazo-Langner, Sudeep Shivakumar, Vicky Tagalakis, Ryan Zarychanski, Susan Solymoss, Nathalie Routhier, James Douketis, Kim Danovitch, Agnes Y Lee, Gregoire Le Gal, Philip S Wells, Daniel J Corsi, Timothy Ramsay, Doug Coyle, Isabelle Chagnon, Zahra Kassam, Hardy Tao, Marc A Rodger, SOME Investigators
Screening for Occult Cancer in Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 20;373(8):697-704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506623. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
Abstract/Text
BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism may be the earliest sign of cancer. Currently, there is a great diversity in practices regarding screening for occult cancer in a person who has an unprovoked venous thromboembolism. We sought to assess the efficacy of a screening strategy for occult cancer that included comprehensive computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis in patients who had a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism.
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial in Canada. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo limited occult-cancer screening (basic blood testing, chest radiography, and screening for breast, cervical, and prostate cancer) or limited occult-cancer screening in combination with CT. The primary outcome measure was confirmed cancer that was missed by the screening strategy and detected by the end of the 1-year follow-up period.
RESULTS: Of the 854 patients who underwent randomization, 33 (3.9%) had a new diagnosis of occult cancer between randomization and the 1-year follow-up: 14 of the 431 patients (3.2%) in the limited-screening group and 19 of the 423 patients (4.5%) in the limited-screening-plus-CT group (P=0.28). In the primary outcome analysis, 4 occult cancers (29%) were missed by the limited screening strategy, whereas 5 (26%) were missed by the strategy of limited screening plus CT (P=1.0). There was no significant difference between the two study groups in the mean time to a cancer diagnosis (4.2 months in the limited-screening group and 4.0 months in the limited-screening-plus-CT group, P=0.88) or in cancer-related mortality (1.4% and 0.9%, P=0.75).
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of occult cancer was low among patients with a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism. Routine screening with CT of the abdomen and pelvis did not provide a clinically significant benefit. (Funded by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada; SOME ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00773448.).
A Delluc, D Antic, R Lecumberri, C Ay, G Meyer, M Carrier
Occult cancer screening in patients with venous thromboembolism: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH.
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Oct;15(10):2076-2079. doi: 10.1111/jth.13791. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
Abstract/Text
M Coppens, J H Reijnders, S Middeldorp, C J M Doggen, F R Rosendaal
Testing for inherited thrombophilia does not reduce the recurrence of venous thrombosis.
J Thromb Haemost. 2008 Sep;6(9):1474-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03055.x. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
Abstract/Text
BACKGROUND: Inherited thrombophilia is only weakly associated with recurrence in patients with a first venous thrombosis (VT). In spite of this, thrombophilia testing is often performed in these patients. Positive results may influence patient management such as prolonged anticoagulant treatment or intensified prophylaxis in high-risk situations.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether thrombophilia testing reduces the risk of recurrent VT by virtue of these management alterations.
METHODS: From a large case-control study of patients (MEGA study), aged 18-70 years, with a first VT between 1999 and 2004, we selected 197 patients who had had a recurrence during follow-up. We compared the incidence of thrombophilia testing to that of a control cohort of 324 patients. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) for recurrent thrombosis in tested vs. non-tested patients. Only patients who were tested before recurrence were regarded as tested. All first and recurrent thrombotic events were objectively confirmed.
RESULTS: Thrombophilia tests were performed in 35% of cases and in 30% of controls. The OR for recurrence was 1.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9-1.8] for tested vs. non-tested patients. After correction for age, sex, family history, geographic region, presence of clinical risk factors, and year of first VT, the OR remained unchanged.
DISCUSSION: Thrombophilia testing in patients with a first VT does not reduce the incidence of recurrence in clinical practice.
Chad M Thorson, Robert M Van Haren, Mark L Ryan, Emiliano Curia, Danny Sleeman, Joe U Levi, Alan S Livingstone, Kenneth G Proctor
Persistence of hypercoagulable state after resection of intra-abdominal malignancies.
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Apr;216(4):580-9; discussion 589-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.006. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
Abstract/Text
BACKGROUND: The hypercoagulable state associated with cancer imparts considerable risk for venous thromboembolism. Surgical resection of malignancies should theoretically reverse tumor-induced hypercoagulability. However, coagulation changes in cancer patients postresection have not been described thoroughly. Conventional coagulation tests are unable to detect hypercoagulable states. In contrast, rotational thromboelastography (ROTEM) can detect hypo- or hypercoagulable conditions. We hypothesized that the cancer-induced hypercoagulable state would improve after surgical resection.
METHODS: After informed consent, blood samples of patients undergoing surgical resection for curative intent were analyzed with serial ROTEM.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (mean ± SD age 66 ± 17 years; 67% male) had cancers involving the pancreas (n = 12 [34%]), esophagus (n = 10 [29%]), stomach (n = 7 [20%]), bile ducts (n = 3 [9%]), and duodenum (n = 3 [9%]). Preoperative ROTEM identified 14 (40%) who were hypercoagulable. After surgical resection, patients became progressively hypercoagulable with more rapid clot formation time (low clot formation time, high alpha) and higher maximum clot firmness. By week one, 86% (n = 30) had abnormal ROTEM values, including 17 of 21 (81%) who had normal coagulation profiles preoperatively. Most (n = 30 [86%]) remained hypercoagulable at 3 to 4 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: Rotational thromboelastography identifies baseline hypercoagulability in more than one third of patients with intra-abdominal malignancies. This is among the first studies to demonstrate progressive hypercoagulability that persists for at least 1 month after resection. These data support postdischarge thromboprophylaxis regimens in high-risk cancer patients.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Jody L Kujovich
Hormones and pregnancy: thromboembolic risks for women.
Br J Haematol. 2004 Aug;126(4):443-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05041.x.
Abstract/Text
During their lifetimes, women face several unique situations with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Doctors in a variety of specialties must advise women on the risks of oral contraceptives (OC), hormone replacement or pregnancy. Modern 'low dose' OC are associated with a three to sixfold increased relative risk of VTE. Hormone replacement and selective oestrogen receptor modulators confer a similar two to fourfold increase in thrombotic risk. However, because the baseline incidence of thrombosis is higher in older postmenopausal women, the absolute risk is higher than in younger OC users. The risk of venous thrombosis is six to 10-fold higher during pregnancy than in non-pregnant women of similar age. Thrombophilic disorders increase the thrombotic risk of OC, hormone replacement and pregnancy, especially in women with homozygous or combined defects. This review focuses on recent data estimating the thrombotic risk of hormonal therapies and pregnancy in women with and without other thrombotic risk factors.
