今日の臨床サポート 今日の臨床サポート

著者: 鎌田一宏 福島県立医科大学 会津医療センター 総合内科

監修: 山中克郎 諏訪中央病院 総合診療科

著者校正済:2024/12/25
現在監修レビュー中
参考ガイドライン:
  1. 日本消化管学会:便通異常症診療ガイドライン2023―慢性下痢症
  1. 米国家庭医療学会(AAFP):成人における慢性下痢症 (2020年)
  1. 米国消化器病学会(AGA):成人における機能性下痢症および下痢型過敏性腸症候群の検査評価に関する診療ガイドライン(2019年)
  1. 英国消化器病学会(BSG):成人慢性下痢症ガイドライン 第3版 (2018年)
患者向け説明資料

改訂のポイント:
  1. 上記参考ガイドライン、特に2023年に日本消化管学会より発行された『便通異常症診療ガイドライン2023―慢性下痢症』をもとに、現在の臨床現場に即して内容を大幅に加筆・修正した。

概要・推奨   

  1. 慢性下痢症は、4週間以上続くまたは反復する、軟便あるいは水様便と定義される(G/J)。
  1. 慢性下痢症は便形状や病態、病因に基づいて、水様性(浸透圧性、分泌性)、脂肪性(消化不良性、吸収不良性)、血性・膿性(炎症性)に分類される(G/J)。
  1. 慢性下痢症はQOLや労働生産性を低下させる可能性がある(G/J)。
アカウントをお持ちの方はログイン
  1. 閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要とな
  1. 閲覧 にはご契約が必要となり ます。閲覧にはご契約が必要とな ります。閲覧にはご契約が 必要となり ます。閲覧にはご契約が必要となり ます。閲覧にはご 契約が必要 となります。閲覧にはご契 約が必要とな
  1. 閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となりま
  1. 閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となりま す。閲覧には
  1. 閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が 必要となりま
  1. 閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧に
  1. 閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります 。閲覧にはご契約

定義・疫学など 

定義・疫学・病態・分類・予後  
定義:
  1. 慢性下痢症は、「下痢が4週間以上持続、または反復する病態」と定義される(G/J)[1][2]
  1. 下痢は「軟便あるいは水様便(Bristol Stool Form Scale 6または7)、かつ(3回/日以上に)排便回数が増加する状態」と定義され、排便頻度の増加のみでは下痢症とは診断しない(G/J)[1][3][4]、(Bristol Stool Form Scale 5を入れるガイドラインもある[3])。
  1. 慢性下痢症(狭義):機能性下痢症を日常臨床に即して拡大解釈したもの。日本消化管学会が定義している。具体的には、慢性下痢症のなかで、器質的疾患などの明らかな原因が除外された「機能性消化管疾患」のうち、積極的に下痢型過敏性腸症候群を含むものではないが、下痢型過敏性腸症候群と確定診断される前の患者や、経過中に下痢主体へ移行した下痢型過敏性腸症候群患者を含む(J)[1]
 
疫学:
  1. 海外の報告では有病率は 1.0~6.6%程度と報告されている[3][5][6][7][8]
  1. 日本人の慢性下痢症(狭義)の有病率は3~5%, 男性に多い傾向があると推定される(J)[1][9]
  1. 年齢と下痢の関係については、若年であることが慢性下痢症の危険因子のひとつである、とするわが国からの報告もある[9]一方で、高齢者であることが慢性下痢症と正の相関を示したとの報告もある[7][10]
 
病態:
  1. 慢性下痢症(狭義)に関する病態は明らかではない(J)。
  1. しかし慢性下痢症(狭義)と連続したスペクトラムと考えられる下痢型過敏性腸症候群については以下のような原因が知られている(J)[1][11][12]
  1. 水吸収機構の異常
  1. 腸管の微小炎症
  1. 粘膜のバリア機能の障害
  1. ホルモン・アミン・ペプチドの異常
  1. 胆汁酸の吸収障害
  1. 短鎖脂肪酸の異常
  1. 腸管運動の異常
  1. 食物成分の吸収障害
  1. 自律神経の異常
  1. 遺伝的要因
  1. 心理的異常
  1. うつ病や不安症は過敏性腸症候群発症のリスク要因である(O)[13][14]
  1. →なお過敏性腸症候群患者とうつ病患者の腸内細菌叢は類似しているとの報告もある(O)[7]
  1. 過敏性腸症候群患者において双極性障害の有病率が⾼い(S)[15]
  1. 過敏性腸症候群患者において睡眠障害を伴うことが多い(S)[16]
  1. 生活習慣
  1. 果糖が含まれるジュース、コーヒーやエナジードリンクなどのカフェイン⼊り飲料、キシリトールが含まれるガムや飴、FODMAPを含有する⾷品の過剰摂取は下痢を悪化させる原因になる[17][18][19]
  1. Fermentable(発酵性)、Oligosaccharides(オリゴ糖類)、Disaccharides (⼆糖類)、Monosaccharides(単糖類)、Polyols(ポリオール類)
  1. 逆に、低FODMAP食は、下痢型過敏性腸症候群患者の下痢症状を改善する(R)[20]
  1. 不規則な⾷習慣、運動不⾜が機能性下痢症と関連していたとの報告がある[21]一方で、喫煙や飲酒は機能性下痢症と有意な関連性はないとする報告もある[22]
  1. 腸内細菌の異常
  1. プロバイオティクスが下痢型過敏性腸症候群患者の便性状を改善させる(R)[23]
  1. 低 FODMAP⾷による下痢症状改善効果は治療前の腸内細菌叢によって異なる(R)[24]
  1. 下痢型過敏性腸症候群患者に対する糞便移植がその症状改善に有効である(S)[25]
 
分類:
  1. 慢性下痢症は便形状や病態、病因に基づいて、水様性(浸透圧性、分泌性)、脂肪性(消化不良性、吸収不良性)、血性・膿性(炎症性)に分類される(G/J)[1][8][26][27]
 
便性状による慢性下痢症の分類

(Schiller LR. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113: 660-669, Sandhu DK, Surawicz C. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2012; 14: 421-427より作成)

出典

「日本消化管学会編:便通異常症診療ガイドライン2023―慢性下痢症, p.5, 2023, 南江堂」より許諾を得て転載.
 
  1. 日本消化管学会は、日常診療に即して慢性下痢症を以下の8つに分類している(J)[1]
  1. 1. 薬剤性、2. 食物起因性、3. 症候性(全身疾患性)、4. 感染性、5. 器質性(炎症性や腫瘍性)、6. 胆汁酸性、7. 機能性、8. 下痢型過敏性腸症候群
 
慢性下痢症の分類

出典

「日本消化管学会編:便通異常症診療ガイドライン2023―慢性下痢症, p.6 図1, 2023, 南江堂」より許諾を得て転載.
 
  1. 上表「慢性下痢症の分類」内の「注2)」について:Rome IV基準では機能性下痢症の診断基準として、腹痛を主症状とする下痢型過敏性腸症候群を除外しているが、機能性下痢症は下痢型過敏性腸症候群と連続したスペクトラムと考えられている[1][28]。したがって、日本消化管学会では日常診療に則して、慢性下痢症(狭義)を下痢型過敏性腸症候群と確定診断される前の患者や、経過中に下痢主体へ移行した下痢型過敏性腸症候群患者も含み、機能性下痢症を拡大解釈して定義している。
 
予後:
  1. 慢性下痢症はQOLや労働生産性を低下させる可能性がある(J)。
  1. 慢性下痢症患者の労働⽣産性は有意に低下し、特に急な便意や便失禁を伴う場合には、⾃信喪失や便失禁の恐怖から退職を余儀なくされる患者も多数存在することが明らかとなっている。その経済的損失は、⽶国消化器病学会の疾病負担調査では、年間少なくとも1億3,600万ドル以上であると⽰されている[6]
  1. 機能性下痢症患者は(下痢型過敏性腸症候群患者と⽐較して腹痛や下痢の重症度は低いにもかかわらず)1/3 以上が不安を感じ、1/5 もの患者がうつ症状と睡眠障害を訴えたと報告されている[29]
  1. 過敏性腸症候群患者は一般人と比較してQOLが低いことが示されている(O)[30][31]
 
  1. 慢性下痢症(狭義)が長期予後に影響を与えるとする明らかなエビデンスは認められないものの、十分な文献がないためその詳細は不明である(J)。
  1. しかし、下痢症状(⼤部分は急性下痢症であるが、⼀部、慢性下痢症が含む)に関連したhemolytic uremic syndrome(HUS)の⻑期経過を評価したメタアナリシスでは約12%の死亡が確認されている[32]
 

問診・診察 

問診・診察のポイント  
問診:
  1. 持続期間が4週間以上であるか確認する。4週間以内であれば感染性急性下痢症などを疑う。
  1. 便の外観や臭いについて確認する。
  1. 油っぽく(便器にこびりつく)、浮遊する便(便器にたまった水に浮かぶ)のときは脂肪性下痢を、目に見える血液の存在は炎症性下痢を疑う。
  1. 水様性下痢のうち、分泌性下痢は絶食しても軽快しないが、浸透圧性下痢は絶食するとおさまる。
  1. また通常、浸透圧性下痢の方が分泌性下痢よりも排便量は少ない。
  1. 大量の下痢は小腸を、少量で頻回の下痢は大腸の障害を疑う。
  1. 血便がある場合は、小腸ではなく大腸疾患を疑う。
  1. 排便によって軽減される腹痛を伴う場合は、下痢型過敏性腸症候群を疑う。
 
慢性下痢症の警告症状・徴候(以下)を確認する(G/J)[1][3][8][26][28][33]
  1. 予期せぬ体重減少
  1. 夜間の下痢、絶食時の下痢
  1. 最近の抗菌薬服用歴
  1. 血便
  1. 大量または非常に頻回の下痢
  1. 低栄養状態
  1. 貧血
  1. 発症年齢50歳以降
  1. 進行性の腹痛
  1. ただし、警告症状・徴候陽性の場合に器質的疾患が認められる可能性は10%未満と低く、警告症状・徴候を除外診断には用いることは難しい(G/J)[1][28]
 
  1. そのほか、生活歴(食生活や飲酒歴)、基礎疾患(糖尿病や甲状腺機能亢進症など)と治療薬の有無、手術歴(胆嚢摘出術や消化管手術歴、放射線治療歴)、炎症性腸疾患または大腸癌の家族歴、下痢症の好発地域への渡航歴などについて聴取する(G/J)[4][33]
  1. 慢性下痢症の訴えでなく、便失禁や便意切迫、頻便、軟便の訴えで受診することもあるので注意を要する[3][28]。このような場合、ブリストル糞便形状スケール(Bristol Stool Form Scale)は下痢と偽性下痢を区別するのに役立つ[34]
  1. 便失禁は切迫性(便意を感じるが、トイレまで我慢できずに便を漏らす)、漏出性(便意を伴わず、気づかないうちに便を漏らす)、および両者が併存する混合性に分類されるが、複数の原因によって発症することが多いため、病態・原因やリスク因子を念頭に置いて病歴聴取を行う[35]
  1. 約700以上の薬剤が下痢症に関与している。代表的な薬剤内服歴については習熟する必要がある[1][26][36]
 
下痢症と関連のある代表的薬剤

(Burgers K, et al. Am Fam Physician 2020; 101: 472-480, 宮谷博幸. 消化管症候群(第3版)―その他の消化管疾患を含めて―空腸, 回腸, 盲腸, 結腸, 直腸(下). 日本臨牀(別冊), p.406-410, 2020より作成)

出典

「日本消化管学会編:便通異常症診療ガイドライン2023―慢性下痢症, p.7, 2023, 南江堂」より許諾を得て転載.
 
診察:
  1. 数ある検査項目を網羅的に実施するのではなく、優先順位を立てて適切な検査を実施するために、腹部診察だけでなく他の身体診察についても実施する。特に以下の部位について評価を行う(J)。
  1. 全身状態・皮膚:全身的な栄養状態や脱水の有無を評価する。
  1. 栄養障害が強ければ、小腸の吸収不良症候群や蛋白漏出性胃腸症を疑う。
  1. 体重減少に加え、全身のリンパ節腫脹があれば、慢性感染症や悪性腫瘍を疑う。
  1. 結節性紅斑や壊疽性膿皮症などの典型的な皮膚症状があれば、炎症性腸疾患を疑う。
  1. 頭頸部:顔面蒼白や眼瞼結膜の貧血様所見から慢性貧血の有無を評価する。
  1. 口腔の観察にて脱水の程度を評価する。
  1. ビタミンB12、葉酸の吸収障害、あるいは鉄欠乏による舌炎の有無を評価する。
  1. 眼球突出などの眼症状に発汗や頻脈を認めれば、甲状腺疾患を疑う。
  1. 顔面の紅潮や発汗・頻脈を認めれば、カルチノイド腫瘍を疑う。
  1. 腹部・肛門:手術痕、腹部膨隆、腸蠕動音・血管雑音、腹部腫瘤や腹水の有無を評価する。
  1. 圧痛、反跳痛、筋性防御の有無を評価する。
  1. 直腸診を実施し、腫瘤性病変の有無に加え、肛門周囲膿瘍や痔瘻についても評価する。また肛門括約筋の収縮を確認し、直腸内の糞便塞栓に伴う漏出性便失禁を除外する。
  1. 便の性状:水様性、脂肪性、炎症性に分類する(参照:<図表>)。
 
検査:
  1. 問診、身体診察から病因、病態を考察し、優先順位を立てて検査を実施する。
 
血液検査・尿検査 (G/J)[1][3][8]
  1. スクリーニング:血算(CBC)、電解質、肝機能、尿素窒素、総蛋白、アルブミン、CRP、フェリチン、血沈など[1][3]
  1. 吸収不良症候群:血清鉄、総鉄結合能、ビタミンB12、葉酸、カルシウム、マグネシウム、コレステロール。
  1. 甲状腺機能亢進症:TSH、遊離T4
  1. 内分泌腫瘍(カルチノイド、VIP産生腫瘍、ガストリノーマ):血清ペプチド(ガストリン、カルシトニン、血管作動性腸管ペプチド)。
  1. セリアック病:血清鉄、総鉄結合能、IgA、抗組織トランスグルタミナーゼIgA抗体、抗筋内膜抗体[3][4]
  1. 胆汁酸性下痢症:空腹時⾎清C4(7α-hydroxy-4-chlesten-3-one)、⾎清fibroblast growth factor 19(FGF19)、75SeHCAT(selenium-75-homocholic acid taurine)。※ただし、わが国では慢性下痢症に対する保険適⽤はない。
  1. (慢性膵炎、膵癌、膵切除後による)膵外分泌機能不全を疑うとき:BT-PABA試験。
 
便検査(G/J)[1][3][8][26][33]
  1. 免疫学的便潜血検査:腫瘍や炎症性腸疾患を疑うとき。
  1. 便浸透圧ギャップ:水様性下痢を浸透圧性下痢または分泌性下痢に分類するとき。
  1. 便浸透圧ギャップ=290 mOsm/kg-2(Na[糞便]+K[糞便])
  1. 上記の式の結果が50 mOsm/kg未満の場合、下痢は分泌性となり、75 mOsm/kgを超える場合、下痢は浸透圧性と評価される[33]
  1. 便培養:細菌性腸炎を疑うとき。
  1. ただし闇雲に依頼しない。抗菌薬使用歴があれば、Clostridioides difficile関連腸炎を念頭にGDH(glutamate dehydrogenase:グルタミン酸脱水素酵素)抗原検査、CDトキシン検査を実施。
  1. 糞便虫卵検査・直接鏡検法:寄生虫を疑うとき(新鮮な便を3回検査する)。
  1. ただし、寄生虫感染の高リスク地域への渡航歴や高リスク地域からの移住歴がない場合は行わない(G)[4]
  1. 便ズダン染色:脂肪便を疑うとき。
  1. 便中カルプロテクチン・便中ラクトフェリン:腸管炎症を反映するマーカーであり、炎症性腸疾患では炎症に相関して上昇する。過敏性腸症候群などの非炎症性疾患との鑑別に有用である(S)[4][37][38]※ただし、わが国では慢性下痢症に対する保険適⽤はない。
  1. 便中キモトリプシン、便中エラスターゼ:(慢性膵炎、膵癌、膵切除後による)膵外分泌機能不全を疑うとき[33]
  1. 腹部 CT 検査(および MRI 検査):
  1. 炎症性腸疾患や腫瘍性疾患による腸管の病変部位同定に加え、 腸管外病変の評価に⽤いる[3]
  1. 膵臓の形態異常や⽯灰化は、慢性膵炎など膵疾患に伴う膵外分泌機能不全の存在を⽰唆する。
  1. また、まれではあるが神経内分泌腫瘍や腹⽔を伴う好酸球性胃腸炎などの鑑別に有⽤となる[1]
 
内視鏡検査:
  1. 大腸内視鏡検査は、器質的疾患との鑑別診断・除外診断において有⽤である(J/G)。
  1. 特に50歳以上、警告徴候を有する患者、治療抵抗例では施⾏することが推奨される(O)[33][28][39]
  1. Rome IV基準に合致する慢性下痢患者の17~28%で、内視鏡検査あるいはランダム⽣検で異常所⾒を認めるとする報告もある(O)[39][40]
  1. 内視鏡的に異常がない場合でもリスクを勘定してランダム⽣検を行うことを考慮する(J/G)。
  1. 全大腸からのランダム生検を行うことで、顕微鏡的大腸炎(lymphocytic colitis、collagenous colitis)や好酸球性胃腸炎、アミロイドーシス等は診断することができる(O)[41]
  1. また、上部内視鏡検査と⼗⼆指腸⽣検によって、セリアック病、tropical sprue、好酸球性胃腸炎、 クローン病、アミロイドーシス、ジアルジやWhipple病などの寄⽣⾍や細菌感染の鑑別に有⽤な場合がある。
  1. 十二指腸液の吸引採取が、小腸内細菌異常増殖症(small intestinal bacterial overgrowth:SIBO)の除外に有⽤との報告や、カプセル内視鏡の有⽤性を論じた報告もあるが、総じて⼤腸内視鏡検査とランダム⽣検ほどエビデンスレベルは⾼くない[33][42][43]
  1. SIBOは⼩腸において腸内細菌が異常増殖した状態であり、消化管の運動障害・狭窄、慢性膵炎などにより⽣じる。最近のメタアナリシスでは 過敏性腸症候群患者のうち約30%にSIBOを認めると報告されている[44]。診断は腸吸引液の定量培養や呼気試験により⾏われるが、実施できる施設は限られており、検査⼿法が統⼀されていないなど課題が残っている。
  1. カプセル内視鏡、もしくはMRエンテログラフィー:小腸の炎症や腫瘍を疑う場合(G)[3]
 
慢性下痢症診断治療フローチャート1

出典

「日本消化管学会編:便通異常症診療ガイドライン2023―慢性下痢症, p.xxii フローチャート1, 2023, 南江堂」より許諾を得て転載.
慢性下痢症診断治療フローチャート2

出典

「日本消化管学会編:便通異常症診療ガイドライン2023―慢性下痢症, p.xxiii フローチャート2, 2023, 南江堂」より許諾を得て転載.
  1. 表「慢性下痢症診断治療フローチャート1」内の「注2)」について:Rome IV基準では機能性下痢症の診断基準として、腹痛を主症状とする下痢型過敏性腸症候群を除外しているが、機能性下痢症は下痢型過敏性腸症候群と連続したスペクトラムと考えられている[1][28]。したがって、日本消化管学会では日常診療に則して、慢性下痢症(狭義)を下痢型過敏性腸症候群と確定診断される前の患者や、経過中に下痢主体へ移行した下痢型過敏性腸症候群患者も含み、機能性下痢症を拡大解釈して定義している。
 
 
 
鑑別疾患表:
頻度の高い疾患
  1. 過敏性腸症候群
  1. 胆汁酸性下痢症
  1. 食事性(乳糖不耐症、人工的甘味料(ソルビトールやキシロール含有のガムやソフトドリンク)、コーヒーやエナジードリンクなどのカフェイン入り飲料、FODMAPを含有する⾷品の過剰摂取、アルコール過剰摂取)
  1. 炎症性腸疾患(潰瘍性大腸炎クローン病、顕微鏡的大腸炎)
  1. 大腸癌
  1. 薬剤性や薬物乱用(抗菌薬(特にマクロライド系)、NSAIDS、マグネシウム製剤、血糖降下薬(メトホルミンやDPP-4阻害薬)、抗がん剤、その他にもフロセミド、甘草過剰など)
  1. 宿便(背景に宿便があると、腸痙攣を起こし宿便周囲の水様粘液または便素材を下痢様に排出する)
  1. Clostridioides difficile関連腸炎
頻度の高くない疾患
  1. 小腸内細菌異常増殖症(SIBO)
  1. 虚血性腸炎
  1. リンパ腫
  1. 外科的要因(小腸切除、便失禁、内瘻など)
  1. セリアック病(特に欧米人で多い)
  1. 放射線性腸炎
  1. 膵臓癌
  1. 甲状腺機能亢進症
  1. 糖尿病
  1. 原虫・寄生虫感染症(ジアルジア症など)
  1. 嚢胞性線維症
  1. 副甲状腺機能低下症
  1. アジソン病
  1. ホルモン産生腫瘍(VIPoma、ガストリノーマ、カルチノイド腫瘍)
  1. その他 小腸疾患(Whipple病、熱帯性スプルー、アミロイドーシス、腸リンパ管拡張症)
  1. 自律神経障害
  1. HIV感染症
  1. 腸結核
  1. 全身性強皮症
  1. Bechet病
  1. 全身性エリテマトーデス
  1. 結腸憩室
  1. ポリポーシス
  1. 蛋白漏出性胃腸症

これより先の閲覧には個人契約のトライアルまたはお申込みが必要です。

最新のエビデンスに基づいた二次文献データベース「今日の臨床サポート」。
常時アップデートされており、最新のエビデンスを各分野のエキスパートが豊富な図表や処方・検査例を交えて分かりやすく解説。日常臨床で遭遇するほぼ全ての症状・疾患から薬剤・検査情報まで瞬時に検索可能です。

まずは15日間無料トライアル
本サイトの知的財産権は全てエルゼビアまたはコンテンツのライセンサーに帰属します。私的利用及び別途規定されている場合を除き、本サイトの利用はいかなる許諾を与えるものでもありません。 本サイト、そのコンテンツ、製品およびサービスのご利用は、お客様ご自身の責任において行ってください。本サイトの利用に基づくいかなる損害についても、エルゼビアは一切の責任及び賠償義務を負いません。 また、本サイトの利用を以て、本サイト利用者は、本サイトの利用に基づき第三者に生じるいかなる損害についても、エルゼビアを免責することに合意したことになります。  本サイトを利用される医学・医療提供者は、独自の臨床的判断を行使するべきです。本サイト利用者の判断においてリスクを正当なものとして受け入れる用意がない限り、コンテンツにおいて提案されている検査または処置がなされるべきではありません。 医学の急速な進歩に鑑み、エルゼビアは、本サイト利用者が診断方法および投与量について、独自に検証を行うことを推奨いたします。

文献 

日本消化管学会編. 便通異常症診療ガイドライン2023――慢性下痢症. 南江堂, 2024.
Fernández-Bañares F, Accarino A, Balboa A, Domènech E, Esteve M, Garcia-Planella E, Guardiola J, Molero X, Rodríguez-Luna A, Ruiz-Cerulla A, Santos J, Vaquero E.
[Chronic diarrhoea: Definition, classification and diagnosis].
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Oct;39(8):535-59. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2015.09.018. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
Abstract/Text Chronic diarrhoea is a common presenting symptom in both primary care medicine and in specialized gastroenterology clinics. It is estimated that >5% of the population has chronic diarrhoea and nearly 40% of these patients are older than 60 years. Clinicians often need to select the best diagnostic approach to these patients and choose between the multiple diagnostic tests available. In 2014 the Catalan Society of Gastroenterology formed a working group with the main objective of creating diagnostic algorithms based on clinical practice and to evaluate diagnostic tests and the scientific evidence available for their use. The GRADE system was used to classify scientific evidence and strength of recommendations. The consensus document contains 28 recommendations and 6 diagnostic algorithms. The document also describes criteria for referral from primary to specialized care.

Copyright © 2015 Elsevier España, S.L.U. y AEEH y AEG. All rights reserved.
PMID 26610769
Arasaradnam RP, Brown S, Forbes A, Fox MR, Hungin P, Kelman L, Major G, O'Connor M, Sanders DS, Sinha R, Smith SC, Thomas P, Walters JRF.
Guidelines for the investigation of chronic diarrhoea in adults: British Society of Gastroenterology, 3rd edition.
Gut. 2018 Aug;67(8):1380-1399. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315909. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
Abstract/Text Chronic diarrhoea is a common problem, hence clear guidance on investigations is required. This is an updated guideline from 2003 for the investigations of chronic diarrhoea commissioned by the Clinical Services and Standards Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG). This document has undergone significant revision in content through input by 13 members of the Guideline Development Group (GDG) representing various institutions. The GRADE system was used to appraise the quality of evidence and grading of recommendations.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
PMID 29653941
Smalley W, Falck-Ytter C, Carrasco-Labra A, Wani S, Lytvyn L, Falck-Ytter Y.
AGA Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Laboratory Evaluation of Functional Diarrhea and Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Adults (IBS-D).
Gastroenterology. 2019 Sep;157(3):851-854. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
Abstract/Text
PMID 31302098
Fine KD, Schiller LR.
AGA technical review on the evaluation and management of chronic diarrhea.
Gastroenterology. 1999 Jun;116(6):1464-86. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70513-5.
Abstract/Text This literature review and the recommendations therein were prepared for the American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice and Practice Economics Committee. The paper was approved by the committee on September 27, 1998.

PMID 10348832
Schiller LR.
Chronic diarrhea.
Gastroenterology. 2004 Jul;127(1):287-93. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.05.028.
Abstract/Text
PMID 15236193
Singh P, Mitsuhashi S, Ballou S, Rangan V, Sommers T, Cheng V, Iturrino-Moreda J, Friedlander D, Nee J, Lembo A.
Demographic and Dietary Associations of Chronic Diarrhea in a Representative Sample of Adults in the United States.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr;113(4):593-600. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2018.24. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
Abstract/Text OBJECTIVES: No studies to date estimate the prevalence of chronic diarrhea in the United States using the Bristol stool form scale (BSFS). This study aims to report the prevalence and associated factors of chronic diarrhea using BSFS scores in a nationally representative sample of US adults.
METHODS: We identified 5,246 adult participants (age ≥20 years) who completed the bowel health questionnaire in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009-2010 data set. Chronic diarrhea was defined as type 6 or 7 rating on the BSFS (mushy or liquid consistency) as the "usual or the most common stool type." Co-variables included age, race, education, poverty income ratio, body mass index, number of medications, feeling depressed, physical activity, and dietary intake. Prevalence estimates and prevalence odds ratios (PORs) were analyzed in adjusted multivariable models using appropriate sampling weights.
RESULTS: We found a prevalence of chronic diarrhea of 6.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.8, 7.4) in the nationally representative data set. High daily carbohydrate intake (POR 1.56, 95% CI 1.02, 2.40), obesity (POR 2.04, 95% CI 1.44, 2.89), feeling depressed (POR 1.84, 95% CI 1.21, 2.80), older age (POR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01, 1.02), and female sex (POR 1.68, 95% CI 1.28, 2.21) were positively correlated with chronic diarrhea. Non-Hispanic White race (POR 0.49, 95% CI 0.29, 0.81) and higher education (POR 0.60, 95% CI 0.43, 0.83) were negatively correlated with chronic diarrhea.
CONCLUSIONS: In a nationally representative sample of the US adults, the prevalence of chronic diarrhea was 6.6%. We identified demographic, lifestyle, and dietary factors associated with chronic diarrhea.

PMID 29610515
Burgers K, Lindberg B, Bevis ZJ.
Chronic Diarrhea in Adults: Evaluation and Differential Diagnosis.
Am Fam Physician. 2020 Apr 15;101(8):472-480.
Abstract/Text Chronic diarrhea is defined as a predominantly loose stool lasting longer than four weeks. A patient history and physical examination with a complete blood count, C-reactive protein, anti-tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A (IgA), total IgA, and a basic metabolic panel are useful to evaluate for pathologies such as celiac disease or inflammatory bowel disease. More targeted testing should be based on the differential diagnosis. When the differential diagnosis is broad, stool studies should be used to categorize diarrhea as watery, fatty, or inflammatory. Some disorders can cause more than one type of diarrhea. Watery diarrhea includes secretory, osmotic, and functional types. Functional disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome and functional diarrhea are common causes of chronic diarrhea. Secretory diarrhea can be caused by bile acid malabsorption, microscopic colitis, endocrine disorders, and some postsurgical states. Osmotic diarrhea can present with carbohydrate malabsorption syndromes and laxative abuse. Fatty diarrhea can be caused by malabsorption or maldigestion and includes disorders such as celiac disease, giardiasis, and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. Inflammatory diarrhea warrants further evaluation and can be caused by disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease, Clostridioides difficile, colitis, and colorectal cancer.

PMID 32293842
Matsumoto Y, Nadatani Y, Otani K, Higashimori A, Ominami M, Fukunaga S, Hosomi S, Kamata N, Kimura T, Fukumoto S, Tanaka F, Taira K, Nagami Y, Watanabe T, Fujiwara Y.
Prevalence and risk factor for chronic diarrhea in participants of a Japanese medical checkup.
JGH Open. 2022 Jan;6(1):69-75. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12704. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although chronic diarrhea is a major digestive disorder, it has not been well studied. The aims of this study were to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of chronic diarrhea in the Japanese population and to assess the relationship between stool type and frequency and symptoms related to chronic diarrhea.
METHOD: A total of 13 668 adults who underwent a medical checkup at MedCity21 were enrolled, and 9540 who met the inclusion criteria participated in the study. Participants with chronic diarrhea were defined as those who typically had a Bristol Stool Form Scale of type 6 or 7.
RESULTS: The prevalence of chronic diarrhea was 3.0%. The risk factors for chronic diarrhea were younger age (odds ratio [OR] 0.984, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.972-0.996), male sex (OR = 2.270, CI = 1.730-2.960), alcohol intake on ≥5 days per week (OR = 2.390, CI = 1.860-3.060), not getting adequate sleep (OR = 0.712, CI = 0.559-0.907), skipping breakfast ≥3 times a week (OR = 1.490, CI = 1.120-1.980), and absence of diabetes mellitus (OR = 0.384, CI = 0.179-0.824). Only 23.5% of the participants in the diarrhea group had ≥3 bowel movements per day. Chronic diarrhea was significantly associated with heartburn, nausea, stomach ache, abdominal bloating and distension, and feeling of stress.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that chronic diarrhea is common in Japan with a prevalence of 3.0%; unique risk factors related to gender, age, and irregular lifestyle were identified. An understanding of bowel habit in the healthy population is helpful for the assessment of change in bowel habit associated with gastrointestinal disorders.

© 2021 The Authors. JGH Open published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PMID 35071791
Talley NJ, Weaver AL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd.
Onset and disappearance of gastrointestinal symptoms and functional gastrointestinal disorders.
Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Jul 15;136(2):165-77. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116483.
Abstract/Text Functional gastrointestinal disorders, including the irritable bowel syndrome, account for up to 40% of referrals to gastroenterologists, but accurate data on the natural history of these disorders in the general population are lacking. Using a reliable and valid questionnaire, the authors estimated the onset and disappearance of symptoms consistent with functional gastrointestinal disorders. An age- and sex-stratified random sample of 1,021 eligible residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, aged 30-64 years were initially mailed the questionnaire; 82% responded (n = 835). In a remailing to responders 12-20 months later, 83% responded again (n = 690). The age- and sex-adjusted prevalence rates per 100 for irritable bowel syndrome, chronic constipation, chronic diarrhea, and frequent dyspepsia were 18.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 15.1-21.1), 14.7 (95% CI 11.9-17.4), 7.3 (95% CI 5.3-9.3), and 14.1 (95% CI 11.5-16.8), respectively, on the second mailing. Symptoms were not significantly associated with nonresponse to the second mailing; moreover, the estimated prevalence rates were not significantly different from the first mailing. Among the 582 subjects free of the irritable bowel syndrome on the first survey, 9% developed symptoms during 795 person-years of follow-up, while 38% of the 108 who initially had the irritable bowel syndrome did not meet the criteria after 146 person-years of follow-up. Similar onset and disappearance rates were observed for the other main symptom categories. While functional gastrointestinal symptoms are common in middle-aged persons and overall prevalence appears relatively stable over 12-20 months, substantial turnover is implied by the observed onset and disappearance rates; several potential sources of bias do not seem to account for this variation.

PMID 1415139
Lacy BE, Pimentel M, Brenner DM, Chey WD, Keefer LA, Long MD, Moshiree B.
ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan 1;116(1):17-44. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001036.
Abstract/Text Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a highly prevalent, chronic disorder that significantly reduces patients' quality of life. Advances in diagnostic testing and in therapeutic options for patients with IBS led to the development of this first-ever American College of Gastroenterology clinical guideline for the management of IBS using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Twenty-five clinically important questions were assessed after a comprehensive literature search; 9 questions focused on diagnostic testing; 16 questions focused on therapeutic options. Consensus was obtained using a modified Delphi approach, and based on GRADE methodology, we endorse the following: We suggest that a positive diagnostic strategy as compared to a diagnostic strategy of exclusion be used to improve time to initiating appropriate therapy. We suggest that serologic testing be performed to rule out celiac disease in patients with IBS and diarrhea symptoms. We suggest that fecal calprotectin be checked in patients with suspected IBS and diarrhea symptoms to rule out inflammatory bowel disease. We recommend a limited trial of a low fermentable oligosaccharides, disacchardies, monosaccharides, polyols (FODMAP) diet in patients with IBS to improve global symptoms. We recommend the use of chloride channel activators and guanylate cyclase activators to treat global IBS with constipation symptoms. We recommend the use of rifaximin to treat global IBS with diarrhea symptoms. We suggest that gut-directed psychotherapy be used to treat global IBS symptoms. Additional statements and information regarding diagnostic strategies, specific drugs, doses, and duration of therapy can be found in the guideline.

Copyright © 2020 by The American College of Gastroenterology.
PMID 33315591
Schmulson MJ, Drossman DA.
What Is New in Rome IV.
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Apr 30;23(2):151-163. doi: 10.5056/jnm16214.
Abstract/Text Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are diagnosed and classified using the Rome criteria; the criteria may change over time as new scientific data emerge. The Rome IV was released in May 2016. The aim is to review the main changes in Rome IV. FGIDs are now called disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). Rome IV has a multicultural rather than a Western-culture focus. There are new chapters including multicultural, age-gender-women's health, intestinal microenvironment, biopsychosocial, and centrally mediated disorders. New disorders have been included although not truly FGIDs, but fit the new definition of DGBI including opioid-induced gastrointestinal hyperalgesia , opioid-induced constipation , and cannabinoid hyperemesis . Also, new FGIDs based on available evidence including reflux hypersensitivity and centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome . Using a normative survey to determine the frequency of normal bowel symptoms in the general population changes in the time frame for diagnosis were introduced. For irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) only pain is required and discomfort was eliminated because it is non-specific, having different meanings in different languages. Pain is now related to bowel movements rather than just improving with bowel movements (ie, can get worse with bowel movement). Functional bowel disorders (functional diarrhea , functional constipation , IBS with predominant diarrhea [IBS-D], IBS with predominant constipation [IBS-C ], and IBS with mixed bowel habits ) are considered to be on a continuum rather than as independent entities. Clinical applications such as diagnostic algorithms and the Multidimensional Clinical Profile have been updated. The new Rome IV iteration is evidence-based, multicultural oriented and with clinical applications. As new evidence become available, future updates are expected.

PMID 28274109
Koloski NA, Jones M, Kalantar J, Weltman M, Zaguirre J, Talley NJ.
The brain--gut pathway in functional gastrointestinal disorders is bidirectional: a 12-year prospective population-based study.
Gut. 2012 Sep;61(9):1284-90. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300474. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
Abstract/Text OBJECTIVE: Psychological factors are known to be associated with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) including irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional dyspepsia (FD). No prospective studies have evaluated whether it is the brain (eg, via anxiety) that drives gut symptoms, or whether gut dysfunction precipitates the central nervous system features such as anxiety. In a 12-year longitudinal, prospective, population-based study, we aimed to determine the directionality of the brain-gut mechanism in FGIDs.
DESIGN: Participants (n=1775) were a random population sample from Australia who responded to a survey on FGIDs in 1997 and agreed to be contacted for future research; 1002 completed the 12-year follow-up survey (response rate =60%), with 217, 82 and 45 people meeting Rome II for new onset FGIDs, IBS and FD, respectively. Anxiety and depression were measured using the Delusions Symptom States Inventory at baseline and follow-up.
RESULTS: Among people free of a FGID at baseline, higher levels of anxiety (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.19, p=0.006) but not depression at baseline was a significant independent predictor of developing new onset FGIDs 12 years later. Among people who did not have elevated levels of anxiety and depression at baseline, those with a FGID at baseline had significantly higher levels of anxiety and depression at follow-up (mean difference coefficient 0.76, p<0.001 and 0.30, p=0.01 for anxiety and depression, respectively). In IBS higher levels of anxiety and depression at baseline were predictive of IBS at follow-up, while only depression was predictive of FD at follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The central nervous system and gut interact bidirectionally in FGIDs.

PMID 22234979
Kim JY, Lim MH.
Psychological factors to predict chronic diarrhea and constipation in Korean high school students.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 9;100(27):e26442. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026442.
Abstract/Text Chronic diarrhea and constipation are common in adolescents and are associated with depression and anxiety. However, the association was not reported in adolescents adjusted for other psychological factors (resilience, personality traits, perceived stress, and suicidal ideation). Therefore, we investigated the significant psychological factors predicting chronic diarrhea and constipation in adjusted individuals for co-variables.A total of 819 Korean high school students who completed bowel health and psychological questionnaires were enrolled in this study. Depression and anxiety were assessed using validated questionnaires. We used multivariate analyses, controlling for demographic, dietary, lifestyle, and psychological variables to predict chronic diarrhea and constipation.Chronic diarrhea and constipation were more common in individuals with depression (22.3% and 18.6%, respectively) than in individuals with no depression (7.0% and 10.9%, respectively). In addition, they were more prevalent in individuals with anxiety (24.5% and 18.6%, respectively) than in individuals with no anxiety (9.1% and 12.7%, respectively). Multivariate analyses showed that resilience (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = 0.98, adjusted 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.97-0.99), moderate (aRR = 6.77, adjusted 95% CI = 3.55-12.91), and severe depression (aRR = 7.42, adjusted 95% CI = 3.61-15.27) were associated with chronic diarrhea. Only mild depression was associated with chronic constipation (aRR = 2.14, adjusted 95% CI = 1.36-3.38). However, anxiety was not significantly associated with chronic diarrhea or constipation.Among the psychological factors predicting disordered bowel habits, resilience and moderate and severe depression were significant predictors of chronic diarrhea, but not anxiety. Furthermore, only mild depression was an independent predictor of chronic constipation.

Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PMID 34232176
Tseng PT, Zeng BS, Chen YW, Wu MK, Wu CK, Lin PY.
A meta-analysis and systematic review of the comorbidity between irritable bowel syndrome and bipolar disorder.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(33):e4617. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004617.
Abstract/Text Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and bipolar disorder (BD) are 2 distinct diseases but may share a similar pathophysiology. However, the comorbidity rate of these 2 diseases is unclear. Also, the current practice guidelines suggest prescribing antidepressants to IBS patients. However, this practice may increase the risk of phase-shift to manic episodes in IBS patients comorbid with BD.This study aimed to determine the relationship between IBS and BD through a meta-analysis.Electronic research through PubMed, Medline, ScienceDirect online, ClinicalTrials.gov, and additional resources.The inclusion criteria were studies investigating the prevalence rate of BD in subjects with IBS and control subjects; and articles on clinical trials on humans.Data from included studies were pooled by a random effects model, and possible confounding variables were examined by meta-regression and subgroup analysis.The current study consists of a total of 177,117 IBS patients and 192,092 control subjects extracted from 6 included studies. The prevalence rate of BD was significantly higher in the IBS patients than in the controls (odds ratio = 2.48, 95% confidence interval: 2.35-2.61, P < 0.001). However, the significance persists only in studies from database research, but not from primary studies. In addition, there was no significant association between the prevalence rate of BD in IBS and several clinical variables, including age, female proportion, prevalence of comorbid diabetes, or hypertension.The total number of included studies is small. Moreover, apparently different results from database research and primary research limit the generalization of our findings to a broad population. Also, we could only perform meta-regression on limited clinical variables.Our results support a significantly higher prevalence rate of BD in IBS patients than in controls. Clinicians should be cautious about the risk of phase-shift to manic episodes when prescribing antidepressants in IBS patients under current practice guidelines.

PMID 27537599
Tu Q, Heitkemper MM, Jarrett ME, Buchanan DT.
Sleep disturbances in irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Mar;29(3). doi: 10.1111/nmo.12946. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbances are well-documented among persons with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Difficulty in falling asleep, shorter sleep time, frequent arousal and awakenings, or non-restorative sleep are the most common manifestations. Sleep disturbances are also related to a higher risk of having IBS. Some researchers have provided evidence of a positive association between poorer subjective sleep quality and increased severity and frequency in gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in those with IBS. However, findings from studies using objective sleep and activity measures, such as polysomnography and actigraphy, are inconclusive.
PURPOSE: This systematic review of the literature between 1990 and 2015 evaluates the evidence of sleep disturbances in adults with IBS and their relationship with GI symptoms.

© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PMID 27683238
Vos MB, Kimmons JE, Gillespie C, Welsh J, Blanck HM.
Dietary fructose consumption among US children and adults: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Medscape J Med. 2008 Jul 9;10(7):160. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
Abstract/Text CONTEXT: High fructose intake has been associated with increased de novo lipogenesis in the liver as well as increased plasma triglycerides, insulin resistance, and obesity. Fructose occurs naturally in fruits and vegetables; however, it is added to many processed foods as table sugar (sucrose) and high-fructose corn syrup. Dietary data from a nationally representative sample in 1977-1978 estimated that mean consumption of fructose was 37 g/day (8% of total intake). Little is known about more recent fructose consumption patterns.
OBJECTIVE: We determined the amount and sources of dietary fructose among US adults and children.
DESIGN: We examined fructose consumption patterns by sex, age group, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and body mass index for 21,483 children and adults. We used a single 24-hour dietary recall administered in the third National Health and Examination Survey (NHANES).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Weighted estimates of fructose intake were tested for significant differences (P < .05) between groups.
RESULTS: The mean consumption of fructose was estimated to be 54.7g/day (range, 38.4-72.8) and accounted for 10.2% of total caloric intake. Consumption was highest among adolescents (12-18 years) at 72.8 g/day (12.1% of total calories). One fourth of adolescents consumed at least 15% of calories from fructose. The largest source of fructose was sugar-sweetened beverages (30%) followed by grains (22%) and fruit or fruit juice (19%).
CONCLUSIONS: Over 10% of Americans' daily calories were from fructose. These results, when compared with a previous nationally representative study, suggest that fructose consumption has increased. Further research is needed to understand the impact of increased intake of fructose on human health.

PMID 18769702
Fernández-Bañares F, Esteve-Pardo M, de Leon R, Humbert P, Cabré E, Llovet JM, Gassull MA.
Sugar malabsorption in functional bowel disease: clinical implications.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1993 Dec;88(12):2044-50.
Abstract/Text OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship of sugar malabsorption to the development of clinical symptoms in functional bowel disease.
METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive outpatients [five men, 20 women; mean age 38.7 +/- 2.6 (SEM) yr] with functional bowel disease and symptoms suggestive of carbohydrate malabsorption were studied. Twelve healthy subjects [six men, six women; mean age 35.7 +/- 3.7 (SEM) yr] acted as the control group. Sugar malabsorption was assessed by breath-hydrogen test after an oral load of various solutions containing lactose (50 g), fructose (25 g), sorbitol (5 g), fructose plus sorbitol (25 + 5 g), and sucrose (50 g). The severity of symptoms developing after sugar challenge was studied. In addition, the effect on clinical symptoms of a diet free of the offending sugars, compared to a low-fat diet, was assessed.
RESULTS: Frequency of sugar malabsorption was high in both patients and controls, with malabsorption of at least one sugar in more than 90% of the subjects. Median symptom scores after both lactose [median 6; interquartile (IQ) range 3-7] and fructose plus sorbitol (median 2; IQ range 0-4) malabsorption were significantly higher than after sucrose load (median 1; IQ range 0-1.5) in functional bowel disease patients (p = 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively). However, there were no differences in healthy controls. In addition, symptoms score after both lactose and fructose plus sorbitol malabsorption was significantly higher in patients than in control subjects (p = 0.02 and p = 0.008, respectively). On the other hand, H2 production capacity, as measured following lactulose load, was significantly higher in patients than in controls. The clinical symptoms improved in 40% of the evaluated patients after restriction of the offending sugars.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that sugar malabsorption may be implicated in the development of abdominal distress in at least a subset of patients with functional bowel disease.

PMID 8249972
Choi YK, Kraft N, Zimmerman B, Jackson M, Rao SS.
Fructose intolerance in IBS and utility of fructose-restricted diet.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 Mar;42(3):233-8. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31802cbc2f.
Abstract/Text INTRODUCTION: Whether dietary fructose intolerance causes symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is unclear. We examined the prevalence of fructose intolerance in IBS and long-term outcome of fructose-restricted diet.
METHODS: Two hundred and nine patients with suspected IBS were retrospectively evaluated for organic illnesses. Patients with IBS (Rome II) and positive fructose breath test received instructions regarding fructose-restricted diet. One year later, their symptoms, compliance with, and effects of dietary modification on lifestyle were assessed using a structured interview.
RESULTS: Eighty patients (m/f=26/54) fulfilled Rome II criteria. Of 80 patients, 31 (38%) had positive breath test. Of 31 patients, 26 (84%) participated in follow-up (mean=13 mo) evaluation. Of 26 patients, 14 (53%) were compliant with diet; mean compliance=71%. In this group, pain, belching, bloating, fullness, indigestion, and diarrhea improved (P<0.02). Of 26 patients, 12 (46%) were noncompliant, and their symptoms were unchanged, except belching. The mean impact on lifestyle, compliant versus noncompliant groups was 2.93 versus 2.57 (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: About one-third of patients with suspected IBS had fructose intolerance. When compliant, symptoms improved on fructose-restricted diet despite moderate impact on lifestyle; noncompliance was associated with persistent symptoms. Fructose intolerance is another jigsaw piece of the IBS puzzle that may respond to dietary modification.

PMID 18223504
Zahedi MJ, Behrouz V, Azimi M.
Low fermentable oligo-di-mono-saccharides and polyols diet versus general dietary advice in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jun;33(6):1192-1199. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14051. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND AND AIM: Recent evidence indicates that new approach of the diet with low fermentable oligo-di-mono-saccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) may have an effective role in management of the patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We compared the results of low FODMAP diet with current dietary treatment, general dietary advices (GDA), on the clinical response in patients with diarrhea subtype of IBS (IBS-D).
METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, single-blind trial, we included 110 patients with IBS-D in two intervention groups. Participants were randomly assigned to the low FODMAP diet (n = 55) and GDA (n = 55) for 6 weeks after a 10-day screening period. Gastrointestinal symptoms and bowel habit status were evaluated using a symptom severity scoring system and Bristol stool form scale pre-intervention and post-intervention. Patients completed 3-day food diary before and after the intervention.
RESULTS: Of 110 patients, 101 completed the dietary interventions. At the baseline, the nutrient intake, severity of symptoms, and demographic data were similar between two groups. After 6 weeks, the low FODMAP diet improves significantly overall gastrointestinal symptoms scores, stool frequency, and consistency versus GDA group (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.003, respectively). Compared with the baseline, both intervention groups expressed a significant reduction in overall scores of symptom severity scoring system, abdominal pain, distension, consistency, and frequency, but this reduction is greater in low FODMAP diet group.
CONCLUSIONS: Both low FODMAP diet and GDA in patients with IBS-D led to adequate improvement of gastrointestinal symptoms for 6 weeks. However, the low FODMAP diet has greater benefits in IBS improvement.

© 2017 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PMID 29159993
Ohlsson B, Manjer J.
Physical inactivity during leisure time and irregular meals are associated with functional gastrointestinal complaints in middle-aged and elder subjects.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;51(11):1299-307. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1209786. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
Abstract/Text OBJECTIVES: Few studies have examined how lifestyle factors affect functional gastrointestinal disorders. The aim of this study was to see if leisure time physical inactivity, dietary habits or body mass index (BMI) were associated with increased risk of functional abdominal pain, functional bloating, functional constipation or functional diarrhea.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study was based on a questionnaire as part of the Swedish EpiHealth study. The cohort included 16,840 subjects between 45 and 75 years of age. Subjects with organic gastrointestinal diseases were excluded. Gastrointestinal symptoms were defined as functional abdominal pain, functional bloating, functional constipation and functional diarrhea. A meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) was considered irregular if not taken every day. The impact of leisure time physical activity, dietary habits and BMI on functional symptoms were examined by logistic regression, adjusted for age, gender, socio-economy, smoking and alcohol habits.
RESULTS: Higher the degree of physical activity, lower the risk for all kind of gastrointestinal complaints (p ≤ 0.001). Intakes of lunch more seldom or never versus every day were associated with diarrhea (OR: 1.592; 95% CI: 1.046-2.422). Irregular breakfast habits tended to associate with bloating (OR: 1.366; 95% CI 0.995-1.874). BMI was not significantly associated with gastrointestinal complaints, but BMI ≥25 kg/m(2) tended to reduce risk of constipation compared with BMI <25 kg/m(2).
CONCLUSION: Physical inactivity during leisure time shows independent associations with all functional gastrointestinal symptoms, whereas irregular dietary habits mainly associates with functional diarrhea. Higher degree of physical activity is associated with corresponding risk reductions of symptoms.

PMID 27435884
Lundström O, Manjer J, Ohlsson B.
Smoking is associated with several functional gastrointestinal symptoms.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016 Aug;51(8):914-22. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1174878. Epub 2016 May 10.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: The etiology behind functional gastrointestinal symptoms is not clear. Only a few studies have examined how lifestyle factors affect these symptoms, especially in middle-aged or elder subjects. The aim of the present study was to describe the prevalence of functional gastrointestinal symptoms in a Swedish population-based cohort of middle-aged to elder subjects, and to examine associations between symptoms and smoking and alcohol use.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study was conducted on a web-based baseline questionnaire from a part of the EpiHealth study. The cohort included 16,840 subjects between 45 and 75 years of age. Subjects with organic gastrointestinal diseases were excluded. Gastrointestinal symptoms were defined as functional abdominal pain, functional bloating, functional constipation, and functional diarrhea. Parameters regarding age, gender, educational level, occupation, civil status, physical activity, and body mass index (BMI) were described, and association between smoking and alcohol habits were calculated, adjusted for parameters with >5 percentage difference between cases and controls.
RESULTS: An association was found between former and current smoking and functional abdominal pain (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.03-1.28 vs. OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.08-1.57). Former smoking was associated with functional bloating (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.04-1.33) and functional constipation (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.06-1.56). There was a trend of decreased functional abdominal pain, functional constipation, and functional diarrhea in subjects with a moderate alcohol intake.
CONCLUSION: Smoking is associated with functional abdominal pain, functional bloating, and functional constipation. A moderate alcohol intake tends to be associated with decreased risk of functional gastrointestinal symptoms.

PMID 27160318
Ki Cha B, Mun Jung S, Hwan Choi C, Song ID, Woong Lee H, Joon Kim H, Hyuk J, Kyung Chang S, Kim K, Chung WS, Seo JG.
The effect of a multispecies probiotic mixture on the symptoms and fecal microbiota in diarrhea-dominant irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar;46(3):220-7. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31823712b1.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: The clinical effect of probiotics on irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is still controversial.
AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the effects of a probiotic mixture on IBS symptoms and the composition of fecal microbiota in patients with diarrhea-dominant IBS (D-IBS).
METHODS: Fifty patients with D-IBS were randomized into placebo or probiotic mixture (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium lactis, Bifidobacterium longum, and Streptococcus thermophilus 1.0×10 CFU) groups. Treatment was taken daily for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was adequate relief (AR) of overall IBS symptoms, which was assessed weekly for 10 weeks. A responder was defined as a patient who experienced AR for at least half of the 10-week study period. Secondary outcomes included the effects on individual symptoms, stool parameters, and IBS quality of life. The fecal flora compositions were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE).
RESULTS: The proportion of AR was consistently higher in the probiotics group than in the placebo group throughout the 10-week period (P<0.05). The proportion of responders was significantly higher in the probiotics group than in the placebo group (48% vs. 12%, P=0.01). Stool consistency improved significantly in the probiotics group compared with the placebo group. Percent changes in individual symptom scores were similar in the 2 groups, but IBS quality of life improvement tended to be higher in the probiotics group. Comparison of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles of fecal flora showed that the concordance rate between bacterial compositions before and after treatment was significantly higher in the probiotics group than in the placebo group (69.5% vs. 56.5%, P=0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: The probiotic mixture was effective in providing AR of overall IBS symptoms and improvement of stool consistency in D-IBS patients, although it had no significant effect on individual symptoms. The therapeutic effect of probiotics is associated with the stabilization of intestinal microbiota.

PMID 22157240
Bennet SMP, Böhn L, Störsrud S, Liljebo T, Collin L, Lindfors P, Törnblom H, Öhman L, Simrén M.
Multivariate modelling of faecal bacterial profiles of patients with IBS predicts responsiveness to a diet low in FODMAPs.
Gut. 2018 May;67(5):872-881. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313128. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
Abstract/Text OBJECTIVE: The effects of dietary interventions on gut bacteria are ambiguous. Following a previous intervention study, we aimed to determine how differing diets impact gut bacteria and if bacterial profiles predict intervention response.
DESIGN: Sixty-seven patients with IBS were randomised to traditional IBS (n=34) or low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) (n=33) diets for 4 weeks. Food intake was recorded for 4 days during screening and intervention. Faecal samples and IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) reports were collected before (baseline) and after intervention. A faecal microbiota dysbiosis test (GA-map Dysbiosis Test) evaluated bacterial composition. Per protocol analysis was performed on 61 patients from whom microbiome data were available.
RESULTS: Responders (reduced IBS-SSS by ≥50) to low FODMAP, but not traditional, dietary intervention were discriminated from non-responders before and after intervention based on faecal bacterial profiles. Bacterial abundance tended to be higher in non-responders to a low FODMAP diet compared with responders before and after intervention. A low FODMAP intervention was associated with an increase in Dysbiosis Index (DI) scores in 42% of patients; while decreased DI scores were recorded in 33% of patients following a traditional IBS diet. Non-responders to a low FODMAP diet, but not a traditional IBS diet had higher DI scores than responders at baseline. Finally, while a traditional IBS diet was not associated with significant reduction of investigated bacteria, a low FODMAP diet was associated with reduced Bifidobacterium and Actinobacteria in patients, correlating with lactose consumption.
CONCLUSIONS: A low FODMAP, but not a traditional IBS diet may have significant impact on faecal bacteria. Responsiveness to a low FODMAP diet intervention may be predicted by faecal bacterial profiles.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02107625.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
PMID 28416515
Ianiro G, Eusebi LH, Black CJ, Gasbarrini A, Cammarota G, Ford AC.
Systematic review with meta-analysis: efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Aug;50(3):240-248. doi: 10.1111/apt.15330. Epub 2019 May 28.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence supports the role of the gut microbiota in the aetiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a highly effective treatment against recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and may be beneficial in ulcerative colitis. However, its efficacy in IBS is uncertain.
AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine this issue.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMBASE Classic, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and clinicaltrials.gov through to March 2019. RCTs recruiting adults with IBS, which compared FMT with placebo, were eligible. Dichotomous symptom data were pooled to obtain a relative risk (RR) of remaining symptomatic after therapy, with a 95% CI.
RESULTS: The search strategy identified 322 citations. Five RCTs were eligible for inclusion, containing 267 patients. Overall, 92.2% of included patients had IBS-D or IBS-M, and only 7.8% IBS-C. When data were pooled for all patients, irrespective of stool type, the RR of IBS symptoms not improving was 0.98 (95% CI 0.58-1.66). Placebo capsules administered orally were superior to capsules containing donor stool in two pooled trials (RR = 1.96; 95% CI 1.19-3.20). FMT from donor stool delivered via colonoscopy was superior to autologous stool in two pooled RCTs (RR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.43-0.93). FMT from donor stool via nasojejunal tube showed a trend towards a benefit over autologous stool in one trial (RR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.46-1.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Fresh or frozen donor stool delivered via colonoscopy or nasojejunal tube may be beneficial in IBS. Larger, more rigorously conducted trials of FMT in IBS are needed.

© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PMID 31136009
Schiller LR.
Evaluation of chronic diarrhea and irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea in adults in the era of precision medicine.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 May;113(5):660-669. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0032-9. Epub 2018 May 1.
Abstract/Text Chronic diarrhea is a common clinical problem, affecting roughly 5% of the population in any given year. Evaluation and management of these patients can be difficult due to the extensive differential diagnosis of this symptom. Many patients with chronic diarrhea have structural problems, such as inflammatory bowel disease or celiac disease, that can be readily identified. Others do not, and often are given a diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D). When based on generally accepted clinical criteria, a diagnosis of IBS-D identifies a group of patients who are unlikely to have disorders producing anatomical changes in the gut. It is less clear that a diagnosis of IBS-D identifies a specific pathophysiology or leads to better management of symptoms. Disorders such as small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, bile acid malabsorption, food intolerance, and motility disorders may account for symptoms in patients with IBS-D. More effective tests are being developed to identify the clinical problems underlying IBS-D and may lead to more specific diagnoses that may improve the results of therapy. Application of the principles of precision medicine (identifying a specific mechanism for disease and applying treatments that work on that mechanism) should lead to more expeditious diagnosis and treatment for patients with chronic diarrhea including IBS-D, but currently is limited by the availability of sufficiently sensitive and specific tests for underlying mechanisms that can predict response to treatment.

PMID 29713027
Sandhu DK, Surawicz C.
Update on chronic diarrhea: a run-through for the clinician.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2012 Oct;14(5):421-7. doi: 10.1007/s11894-012-0283-3.
Abstract/Text Chronic diarrhea is a common patient complaint, with an estimated prevalence of 5 %. Diarrhea is defined as >200 g/day of stool with decreased consistency, and chronic diarrhea is defined as lasting more than 4 weeks. The purpose of this review is to guide the clinician's diagnostic evaluation and management of chronic diarrhea, rather than providing a textbook comprehensive review of the subject, focusing on the patient in developed countries and excluding the immune suppressed patient. While the investigation and treatment of chronic diarrhea can be challenging due to its myriad causes, when the clinician employs a practical approach, dividing chronic diarrhea into bloody, fatty, and watery causes, it simplifies and streamlines the work-up and management plan and leads to improved patient outcomes.

PMID 22903799
Mearin F, Lacy BE, Chang L, Chey WD, Lembo AJ, Simren M, Spiller R.
Bowel Disorders.
Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb 18;. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.031. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
Abstract/Text Functional bowel disorders are highly prevalent disorders found worldwide. These disorders have the potential to affect all members of society, regardless of age, gender, race, creed, color or socioeconomic status. Improving our understanding of functional bowel disorders (FBD) is critical as they impose a negative economic impact to the global health care system in addition to reducing quality of life. Research in the basic and clinical sciences during the past decade has produced new information on the epidemiology, etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of FBDs. These important findings created a need to revise the Rome III criteria for FBDs, last published in 2006. This manuscript classifies the FBDs into five distinct categories: irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); functional constipation (FC); functional diarrhea (FDr); functional abdominal bloating/distention (FAB/D); and unspecified FBD (U-FBD). Also included in this article is a new sixth category, opioid induced constipation (OIC) which is distinct from the functional bowel disorders (FBDs). Each disorder will first be defined, followed by sections on epidemiology, rationale for changes from prior criteria, clinical evaluation, physiologic features, psychosocial features and treatment. It is the hope of this committee that this new information will assist both clinicians and researchers in the decade to come.

Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PMID 27144627
Singh P, Lee HN, Rangan V, Ballou S, Lembo J, Katon J, McMahon C, Friedlander D, Iturrino J, Nee J, Lembo A.
Similarities in Clinical and Psychosocial Characteristics of Functional Diarrhea and Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Feb;18(2):399-405.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.020. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND & AIMS: There have been few published studies of clinical and psychological characteristics of patients with functional diarrhea (FDr). We studied the clinical and psychological characteristics of patients with FDr presenting to a tertiary care clinic, and compared symptom profiles of FDr with those of IBS-diarrhea (IBS-D).
METHODS: Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of FDr (n = 48) or IBS-D (n = 49), per Rome IV criteria, completed a detailed symptom survey from October 2017 through July 2018. Abdominal pain and diarrhea severity were assessed using patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) questionnaires. Patients with anxiety, depression, or sleep disturbances were identified based on PROMIS T-score of 60 or more. Mean and proportions were compared using the Student t test and chi-square analyses, respectively.
RESULTS: A significantly lower proportion of patients with FDr reported abdominal pain (77.1%) than patients with IBS-D (100%, P < .001). The proportion of patients reporting abdominal bloating and level of severity did not differ significantly between groups. Proportions of bowel movements with diarrhea did not differ significantly between groups (P = .54), but the mean diarrhea PROMIS T-score was significantly higher among patients with IBS-D (P = .03). This difference resulted from the significantly higher levels of fecal urgency-related distress reported by patients with IBS-D (P = .007). Proportions of patients with anxiety, depression, or sleep disturbance, and their severities, did not differ significantly between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of about 100 patients with FDr or IBS-D, we found overlap in gastrointestinal and psychosomatic symptoms. These 2 entities appear to be a continuum.

Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PMID 31442602
Gralnek IM, Hays RD, Kilbourne A, Naliboff B, Mayer EA.
The impact of irritable bowel syndrome on health-related quality of life.
Gastroenterology. 2000 Sep;119(3):654-60. doi: 10.1053/gast.2000.16484.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND & AIMS: Few data are available to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of people with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We evaluated and compared the impact of IBS on HRQOL using previously reported HRQOL data for the U.S. general population and for people with selected chronic diseases.
METHODS: Using the SF-36 Health Survey, we compared the HRQOL of IBS patients (n = 877) with previously reported SF-36 data for the general U.S. population and for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), diabetes mellitus, depression, and dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
RESULTS: On all 8 SF-36 scales, IBS patients had significantly worse HRQOL than the U.S. general population (P < 0. 001). Compared with GERD patients, IBS patients scored significantly lower on all SF-36 scales (P < 0.001) except physical functioning. Similarly, IBS patients had significantly worse HRQOL on selected SF-36 scales than patients with diabetes mellitus and ESRD. IBS patients had significantly better mental health SF-36 scale scores than patients with depression (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: IBS patients experience significant impairment in HRQOL. Decrements in HRQOL are most pronounced in energy/fatigue, role limitations caused by physical health problems, bodily pain, and general health perceptions. These data offer further insight into the impact of IBS on patient functional status and well-being.

PMID 10982758
Halder SL, Locke GR 3rd, Talley NJ, Fett SL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd.
Impact of functional gastrointestinal disorders on health-related quality of life: a population-based case-control study.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Jan 15;19(2):233-42. doi: 10.1111/j.0269-2813.2004.01807.x.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: The health-related quality of life is impaired in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders seen in referral centres.
AIM: To determine whether the health-related quality of life is impaired in subjects with functional disorders in the community and whether any differences can be explained by psychological co-morbidity.
METHODS: In a population-based, nested, case-control study, subjects reporting symptoms of either dyspepsia or irritable bowel syndrome and healthy controls were interviewed and completed a battery of psychological measures plus a validated, generic, health-related quality of life measure (Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short form health survey, SF-36). The association between irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia and the physical and mental composite scores of SF-36 were assessed with and without adjustment for psychological state.
RESULTS: One hundred and twelve cases (30 dyspepsia, 39 irritable bowel syndrome, 32 dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome and 11 gastrointestinal symptoms but not dyspepsia or irritable bowel syndrome) and 110 controls were enrolled. In the unadjusted linear regression models, irritable bowel syndrome (but not dyspepsia) was negatively associated with the physical composite score (P < 0.05); in an adjusted model, the association between the physical health-related quality of life and irritable bowel syndrome was explained by the Symptom Checklist-90 somatization score alone. In unadjusted models, irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia were each negatively associated with the mental composite score (P < 0.05). The association between the mental health-related quality of life and dyspepsia remained after adjusting for psychological covariates, but the association between this and irritable bowel syndrome was not significant after adjustment.
CONCLUSIONS: In the community, health-related quality of life is impaired in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia; however, much of this association can be explained by psychological factors.

PMID 14723614
Garg AX, Suri RS, Barrowman N, Rehman F, Matsell D, Rosas-Arellano MP, Salvadori M, Haynes RB, Clark WF.
Long-term renal prognosis of diarrhea-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
JAMA. 2003 Sep 10;290(10):1360-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.10.1360.
Abstract/Text CONTEXT: The long-term renal prognosis of patients with diarrhea-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) remains controversial.
OBJECTIVES: To quantify the long-term renal prognosis of patients with diarrhea-associated HUS and to identify reasons for different estimates provided in the literature.
DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE and Experta Medica (EMBASE) bibliographic databases and conference proceedings, and we contacted experts until February 2003. We also searched the Institute for Scientific Information index and reference lists of all studies that fulfilled our eligibility criteria. The search strategy included the terms hemolytic-uremic syndrome, purpura, thrombotic thrombocytopenic, Escherichia coli O157, longitudinal studies, kidney diseases, hypertension, and proteinuria
STUDY SELECTION: Any study that followed up 10 or more patients with primary diarrhea-associated HUS for at least 1 year for renal sequelae.
DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently abstracted data on study and patient characteristics, renal measures, outcomes, and prognostic features. Disagreements were resolved by a third author or by consensus.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Forty-nine studies of 3476 patients with a mean follow-up of 4.4 years (range, 1-22 years at last follow-up) from 18 countries, 1950 to 2001, were summarized. At the time of recruitment, patients were aged 1 month to 18 years. In the different studies, death or permanent end-stage renal disease (ESRD) ranged from 0% to 30%, with a pooled incidence of 12% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10%-15%). A glomerular filtration rate lower than 80 mL/min per 1.73 m2, hypertension, or proteinuria was extremely variable and ranged from 0% to 64%, with a pooled incidence of 25% (95% CI, 20%-30%). A higher severity of acute illness was strongly associated with worse long-term prognosis. Studies with a higher proportion of patients with central nervous system symptoms (coma, seizures, or stroke) had a higher proportion of patients who died or developed permanent ESRD at follow-up (explaining 44% of the between-study variability, P =.01). Studies with a greater proportion of patients lost to follow-up also described a worse prognosis (P =.001) because these patients were typically healthier than those followed up. One or more years after diarrhea-associated HUS, patients with a predicted creatinine clearance higher than 80 mL/min per 1.73 m2, no overt proteinuria, and no hypertension appeared to have an excellent prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Death or ESRD occurs in about 12% of patients with diarrhea-associated HUS, and 25% of survivors demonstrate long-term renal sequelae. Patients lost to follow-up contribute to worse estimates in some studies. The severity of acute illness, particularly central nervous system symptoms and the need for initial dialysis, is strongly associated with a worse long-term prognosis.

PMID 12966129
Schiller LR, Pardi DS, Sellin JH.
Chronic Diarrhea: Diagnosis and Management.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Feb;15(2):182-193.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.07.028. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
Abstract/Text Chronic diarrhea is a common problem affecting up to 5% of the population at a given time. Patients vary in their definition of diarrhea, citing loose stool consistency, increased frequency, urgency of bowel movements, or incontinence as key symptoms. Physicians have used increased frequency of defecation or increased stool weight as major criteria and distinguish acute diarrhea, often due to self-limited, acute infections, from chronic diarrhea, which has a broader differential diagnosis, by duration of symptoms; 4 weeks is a frequently used cutoff. Symptom clusters and settings can be used to assess the likelihood of particular causes of diarrhea. Irritable bowel syndrome can be distinguished from some other causes of chronic diarrhea by the presence of pain that peaks before defecation, is relieved by defecation, and is associated with changes in stool form or frequency (Rome criteria). Patients with chronic diarrhea usually need some evaluation, but history and physical examination may be sufficient to direct therapy in some. For example, diet, medications, and surgery or radiation therapy can be important causes of chronic diarrhea that can be suspected on the basis of history alone. Testing is indicated when alarm features are present, when there is no obvious cause evident, or the differential diagnosis needs further delineation. Testing of blood and stool, endoscopy, imaging studies, histology, and physiological testing all have roles to play but are not all needed in every patient. Categorizing patients after limited testing may allow more directed testing and more rapid diagnosis. Empiric antidiarrheal therapy can be used to mitigate symptoms in most patients for whom a specific treatment is not available.

Copyright © 2017 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PMID 27496381
O'Donnell LJ, Virjee J, Heaton KW.
Detection of pseudodiarrhoea by simple clinical assessment of intestinal transit rate.
BMJ. 1990 Feb 17;300(6722):439-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6722.439.
Abstract/Text
PMID 2107897
日本大腸肛門病学会編. 便失禁診療ガイドライン2024年版 改訂第2版. 南江堂, 2024.
Jain NK, Rosenberg DB, Ulahannan MJ, Glasser MJ, Pitchumoni CS.
Sorbitol intolerance in adults.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1985 Sep;80(9):678-81.
Abstract/Text Sorbitol is a commonly used sugar substitute in "sugar-free" food products. Although sorbitol intolerance manifested by abdominal pain, bloating, and diarrhea has been observed in children, it has not been well documented in adults. Forty-two healthy adults (23 whites, 19 nonwhites) participated in this study. After ingestion of 10 g of sorbitol solution, end expiratory breath samples were collected at 15-min intervals for 4 h and analyzed for H2 concentration. Clinical sorbitol intolerance was detected in 43% of the whites and 55% of the nonwhites, the difference not being statistically significant. However, severe clinical sorbitol intolerance was significantly more prevalent in nonwhites (32%) as compared to whites (4%). There was a good correlation between the severity of symptoms and the amount of hydrogen exhaled. Dietetic foods, many of them containing sorbitol, are very popular with diabetics and "weight watchers." Based on our observations, we believe that a large number of adults could be suffering from sorbitol-induced nonspecific abdominal symptoms and diarrhea. These symptoms could lead to an extensive diagnostic work-up and lifelong diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome.

PMID 4036946
Menees SB, Powell C, Kurlander J, Goel A, Chey WD.
A meta-analysis of the utility of C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, fecal calprotectin, and fecal lactoferrin to exclude inflammatory bowel disease in adults with IBS.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar;110(3):444-54. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.6. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
Abstract/Text OBJECTIVES: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is viewed as a diagnosis of exclusion by most providers. The aim of our study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the utility of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), fecal calprotectin, and fecal lactoferrin to distinguish between patients with IBS and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and healthy controls (HCs).
METHODS: A systematic online database search was performed. Included studies were prospective, adult, diagnostic cohort studies with any of the four tests. The means and s.d. values of biomarker logarithms were estimated based on studies that gave medians and either confidence intervals for the median, interquartile ranges, or ranges. We used a Naive Bayes approach to estimate the probability of being a HC, having IBS, or having IBD based on the biomarker values.
RESULTS: Systematic review identified 1,252 citations. After cross-referencing medical subject headings, detailed evaluation identified 140 potentially relevant journal articles/abstracts for CRP, ESR, calprotectin, and lactoferrin of which 4, 4, 8, and 2 fulfilled our inclusion criteria, respectively. None of the biomarkers reliably distinguished between IBS and healthy controls. At a CRP level of ≤0.5 or calprotectin level of ≤40 μg/g, there was a ≤1% probability of having IBD. Individual analysis of ESR and lactoferrin had little clinical utility.
CONCLUSION: CRP and calprotectin of ≤0.5 or 40, respectively, essentially excludes IBD in patients with IBS symptoms. The addition of CRP and calprotectin to symptom-based criteria may improve the confident diagnosis of IBS.

PMID 25732419
Schoepfer AM, Trummler M, Seeholzer P, Seibold-Schmid B, Seibold F.
Discriminating IBD from IBS: comparison of the test performance of fecal markers, blood leukocytes, CRP, and IBD antibodies.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008 Jan;14(1):32-9. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20275.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: Symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) can overlap. We aimed to determine the accuracy of fecal markers, C-reactive protein (CRP), blood leukocytes, and antibody panels for discriminating IBD from IBS and to define a "best test."
METHODS: We prospectively included 64 patients with IBD (36 Crohn's disease [CD], 28 ulcerative colitis [UC]), 30 with IBS, and 42 healthy controls. Besides CRP and blood leukocytes, blinded fecal samples were measured for calprotectin (PhiCal Test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]), lactoferrin (IBD-SCAN, ELISA), Hexagon-OBTI (immunochromatographic test for detection of human hemoglobin), and LEUKO-TEST (lactoferrin latex-agglutination test). Blinded serum samples were measured for the antibodies ASCA (ELISA) and pANCA (immunofluorescence).
RESULTS: Overall accuracy of tests for discriminating IBD from IBS: IBD-SCAN 90%, PhiCal Test 89%, LEUKO-TEST 78%, Hexagon-OBTI 74%, CRP 73%, blood leukocytes 63%, CD antibodies (ASCA+/pANCA- or ASCA+/pANCA+) 55%, UC antibodies (pANCA+/ASCA-) 49%. ASCA and pANCA had an accuracy of 78% for detecting CD and 75% for detecting UC, respectively. The overall accuracy of IBD-SCAN and PhiCal Test combined with ASCA/pANCA for discriminating IBD from IBS was 92% and 91%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The PhiCal Test and IBD-SCAN are highly accurate for discriminating IBD from IBS. There is only marginal additional diagnostic accuracy when the PhiCal Test and IBD-SCAN are combined with ASCA and pANCA. ASCA and pANCA have a high specificity for IBD.

PMID 17924558
Asghar Z, Thoufeeq M, Kurien M, Ball AJ, Rej A, David Tai FW, Afify S, Aziz I.
Diagnostic Yield of Colonoscopy in Patients With Symptoms Compatible With Rome IV Functional Bowel Disorders.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;20(2):334-341.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.062. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is little data on the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy in patients with symptoms compatible with functional bowel disorders (FBDs). Previous studies have only focused on diagnostic outcomes of colonoscopy in those with suspected irritable bowel syndrome using historic Rome I-III criteria, whilst having partially assessed for alarm features and shown markedly conflicting results. There is also no colonoscopy outcome data for other FBDs, such as functional constipation or functional diarrhea. Using the contemporaneous Rome IV criteria we determined the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy in patients with symptoms compatible with a FBD, stratified diligently according to the presence or absence of alarm features.
METHODS: Basic demographics, alarm features, and bowel symptoms using the Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire were collected prospectively from adults attending out-patient colonoscopy in 2019. Endoscopists were blinded to the questionnaire data. Organic disease was defined as the presence of inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal cancer, or microscopic colitis.
RESULTS: 646 patients fulfilled symptom-based criteria for the following Rome IV FBDs: IBS (56%), functional diarrhea (27%) and functional constipation (17%). Almost all had alarm features (98%). The combined prevalence of organic disease was 12%, being lowest for functional constipation and IBS-constipation (∼6% each), followed by IBS-mixed (∼9%), and highest amongst functional diarrhea and IBS-diarrhea (∼17% each); p = .005. The increased prevalence of organic disease in diarrheal versus constipation disorders was accounted for by microscopic colitis (5.7% vs. 0%, p < .001) but not inflammatory bowel disease (7.2% vs. 4.0%, p = .2) or colorectal cancer (4.2% vs. 2.3%, p = .2). However, 1-in-4 chronic diarrhea patients - conceivably at risk for microscopic colitis - did not have colonic biopsies taken. Finally, only 11 of 646 (2%) patients were without alarm features, in whom colonoscopy was normal.
CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with symptoms of FBDs who are referred for colonoscopy have alarm features. The presence of organic disease is significantly higher in diarrheal versus constipation disorders, with microscopic colitis largely accounting for the difference whilst also being a missed diagnostic opportunity. In those patients without alarm features, the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy was nil.

Copyright © 2022 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PMID 32882424
Paudel MS, Mandal AK, Shrestha B, Poudyal NS, Kc S, Chaudhary S, Shrestha R, Goel K.
Prevalence of Organic Colonic Lesions by Colonoscopy in Patients Fulfilling ROME IV Criteria of Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2018 Jan-Feb;56(209):487-492.
Abstract/Text INTRODUCTION: Irritable bowel syndrome occurs as recurrent abdominal pain that is related to defecation and associated with change in frequency and/or form of stool. Few Patients with IBS may have organic lesions detectable at colonoscopy.
METHODS: A cross sectional study was carried out in 140 consecutive patients of IBS fulfilling the ROME IV criteria. The study was conducted in Gastroenterology unit, Department of Medicine, Bir hospital, Kathmandu from July 2016 to September 2017. All patients underwent full colonoscopy along with biopsy from sigmoid colon and any visibly abnormal areas.
RESULTS: The average age of patients was 37.5 years with 76 (52.8%) males. Forty-two (30%) had IBS-D, 36 (26%) had IBS-C, 31 (22%) had IBS-M and 31 (22%) had IBS-U. Dyspepsia was seen in 16 (11.4%) and fear of TB/Malignancy/IBD was seen in 27 (19.2%). Organic lesions were seen in 39 (27.85%) patients. Nonspecific colitis was seen in 10 (7.1%) followed by ileal erosions in 7 (5%), polyps in 8 (5.7%), hemorrhoids in 6 (4.2%) and diverticula in 3 (2.1%). Only one (0.71%) patient had microscopic colitis and one (0.71%) had malignant lesion seen at histopathological examination. Females with IBS-D had more organic findings than males (P=0.03, RR=4.13, 95% CI=1.21-15.71).
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of organic lesions in patients with IBS fulfilling ROME IV criteria is 27%. Dyspepsia is the most common comorbidity and fear of TB/malignancy/IBD is the most common reason for seeking health care. Females with IBS-D have a higher risk of detecting organic lesions by colonoscopy and histopathology examination.

PMID 30058630
Harewood GC, Olson JS, Mattek NC, Holub JL, Lieberman DA.
Colonic biopsy practice for evaluation of diarrhea in patients with normal endoscopic findings: results from a national endoscopic database.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Mar;61(3):371-5. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02594-5.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: The colonic biopsy is the only reliable method for identification of microscopic colitis in patients with chronic diarrhea and normal endoscopic findings.
METHODS: The Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative national endoscopic database was analyzed to determine the rate at which colonic biopsy specimens were obtained in patients undergoing colonoscopy for the evaluation of diarrhea with no visible mucosal abnormality.
RESULTS: Between January 2000 and December 2003, 5565 unique adult patients underwent colonoscopy for evaluation of diarrhea without detection of any mucosal abnormality. Colonic mucosal biopsy specimens were obtained in 4410 (79.2%) of these patients. The rates at which biopsy specimens were obtained differed among the sites where colonoscopy was performed; biopsy specimens were obtained from more patients undergoing colonoscopy in university-affiliated settings (86.8%) compared with Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMC) (78.5%) or community sites (78.6%) ( p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, biopsy specimens were more likely to be obtained in younger patients (OR 0.7: 95%CI[0.6, 0.8] for age >50 years vs. <50 years), women patients (OR 1.4: 95% CI[1.2, 1.6] in community setting; OR 4.1: 95% CI[1.6, 10.5] in VAMC setting), and patients seen in university-affiliated medical centers (university center OR 2.1: 95% CI[1.5, 3.0] vs. community setting).
CONCLUSIONS: Biopsy specimens are obtained in four fifths of patients with diarrhea and normal colonoscopy findings to exclude microscopic colitis. Variation in biopsy practice exists among endoscopy site types and by gender. Clear guidelines are needed for the endoscopic approach to these patients.

PMID 15758905
Schiller LR, Pardi DS, Spiller R, Semrad CE, Surawicz CM, Giannella RA, Krejs GJ, Farthing MJ, Sellin JH.
Gastro 2013 APDW/WCOG Shanghai working party report: chronic diarrhea: definition, classification, diagnosis.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jan;29(1):6-25. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12392.
Abstract/Text Diarrhea is best defined as passage of loose stools often with more frequent bowel movements. For clinical purposes, the Bristol Stool Form Scale works well to distinguish stool form and to identify loose stools. Laboratory testing of stool consistency has lagged behind. Acute diarrhea is likely to be due to infection and to be self-limited. As diarrhea becomes chronic, it is less likely to be due to infection; duration of 1 month seems to work well as a cut-off for chronic diarrhea, but detailed scientific knowledge is missing about the utility of this definition. In addition to duration of diarrhea, classifications by presenting scenario, by pathophysiology, and by stool characteristics (e.g. watery, fatty, or inflammatory) may help the canny clinician refine the differential diagnosis of chronic diarrhea. In this regard, a careful history remains the essential part of the evaluation of a patient with diarrhea. Imaging the intestine with endoscopy and radiographic techniques is useful, and biopsy of the small intestine and colon for histological assessment provides key diagnostic information. Endomicroscopy and molecular pathology are only now being explored for the diagnosis of chronic diarrhea. Interest in the microbiome of the gut is increasing; aside from a handful of well-described infections because of pathogens, little is known about alterations in the microbiome in chronic diarrhea. Serological tests have well-defined roles in the diagnosis of celiac disease but have less clearly defined application in autoimmune enteropathies and inflammatory bowel disease. Measurement of peptide hormones is of value in the diagnosis and management of endocrine tumors causing diarrhea, but these are so rare that these tests are of little value in screening because there will be many more false-positives than true-positive results. Chemical analysis of stools is of use in classifying chronic diarrhea and may limit the differential diagnosis that must be considered, but interpretation of the results is still evolving. Breath tests for assessment of carbohydrate malabsorption, small bowel bacterial overgrowth, and intestinal transit are fraught with technical limitations that decrease sensitivity and specificity. Likewise, tests of bile acid malabsorption have had limited utility beyond empirical trials of bile acid sequestrants.

© 2013 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
PMID 24117999
Poortmans P, Kindt S.
Diagnostic approach to chronic diarrhoea and recent insights in treatment of functional diarrhoea including irritable bowel syndrome.
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2020 Jul-Sep;83(3):461-474.
Abstract/Text Chronic diarrhoea is a common clinical problem with a plethora of possible causes and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. The value of diagnostic assessment by laboratory testing, stool analysis, evaluation of bile acid malabsorption, endoscopy, breath testing and radiological imaging techniques is discussed. The decision to focus investigations on excluding certain pathologies remains a matter of clinical judgement. Functional diarrhoea and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) being the most frequent causes of chronic diarrhoea, recent insights in the role of dietary management, management of dysbiosis by pre-, pro- and antibiotics and faecal microbiota transplantation, as well as targeted treatment by spasmolytics, 5-HT3 receptor antagonists and eluxadoline will be reviewed.

© Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica.
PMID 33094595
Shah A, Talley NJ, Jones M, Kendall BJ, Koloski N, Walker MM, Morrison M, Holtmann GJ.
Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Feb;115(2):190-201. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000504.
Abstract/Text INTRODUCTION: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the prevalence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and controls.
METHODS: Electronic databases were searched up to December 2018 for studies reporting SIBO prevalence in patients with IBS. Prevalence rates, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of SIBO in patients with IBS and controls were calculated.
RESULTS: We included 25 studies with 3,192 patients with IBS and 3,320 controls. SIBO prevalence in patients with IBS was significantly increased compared with controls (OR = 3.7, 95% CI 2.3-6.0). In studies using only healthy controls, the OR for SIBO in patients with IBS was 4.9 (95% CI 2.8-8.6). With breath testing, SIBO prevalence in patients with IBS was 35.5% (95% CI 33.6-37.4) vs 29.7% (95% CI 27.6-31.8) in controls. Culture-based studies yielded a SIBO prevalence of 13.9% (95% CI 11.5-16.4) in patients with IBS and 5.0% (95% CI 3.9-6.2) in controls with a cutoff value of 10 colony-forming units per milliliter vs 33.5% (95% CI 30.1-36.9) in patients with IBS and 8.2% (95% CI 6.8-9.6) in controls with a cutoff value of 10 colony-forming unit per milliliter, respectively. SIBO prevalence diagnosed by lactulose breath test is much greater in both patients with IBS (3.6-fold) and controls (7.6-fold) compared with glucose breath test. Similar difference is seen when lactulose breath test is compared with culture methods. OR for SIBO in patients with IBS-diarrhea compared with IBS-constipation was 1.86 (95% CI 1.83-2.8). Methane-positive breath tests were significantly more prevalent in IBS-constipation compared with IBS-diarrhea (OR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.2). In patients with IBS, proton pump inhibitor was not associated with SIBO (OR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.5, P = 0.55).
DISCUSSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests a link between IBS and SIBO. However, the overall quality of the evidence is low. This is mainly due to substantial "clinical heterogeneity" due to lack of uniform selection criteria for cases and controls and limited sensitivity and specificity of the available diagnostic tests.

PMID 31913194
Yoon SR, Lee JH, Lee JH, Na GY, Lee KH, Lee YB, Jung GH, Kim OY.
Low-FODMAP formula improves diarrhea and nutritional status in hospitalized patients receiving enteral nutrition: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind clinical trial.
Nutr J. 2015 Nov 3;14:116. doi: 10.1186/s12937-015-0106-0. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: Fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) are poorly absorbed, short-chain carbohydrates that play an important role in inducing functional gut symptoms. A low-FODMAP diet improves abdominal symptoms in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome. However, there were no study for the effect of FODMAP content on gastrointestinal intolerance and nutritional status in patients receiving enteral nutrition (EN).
METHODS: In this randomized, multicenter, double-blind, 14-day clinical trial, eligible hospitalized patients receiving EN (n = 100) were randomly assigned to three groups; 84 patients completed the trial (low-FODMAP EN, n = 30; moderate-FODMAP EN, n = 28; high-FODMAP EN, n = 26). Anthropometric and biochemical parameters were measured; stool assessment was performed using the King's Stool Chart and clinical definition.
RESULTS: Baseline values were not significantly different among the three groups. After the 14-day intervention, diarrhea significantly improved in the low-FODMAP group than in the moderate- and high-FODMAP groups (P < 0.05). King's Stool scores in diarrhea subjects were significantly and steadily reduced in the low-FODMAP group compared with the other two groups (P for time and EN type interaction <0.05). BMI increased significantly in the low- and high-FODMAP groups during the intervention (P < 0.05 for both), and showed a trend toward increasing in the moderate-FODMAP group (P < 0.10). Serum prealbumin increased significantly in all groups by 14-day; by 3-day, it had increased to the levels at 14-day in the low-FODMAP group. At 14-day, serum transferrin had increased significantly in the moderate-FODMAP group. In addition, subjects were classified by final condition (unimproved, normal maintenance, diarrhea only improved, constipation only improved, and recurrent diarrhea/constipation improved). Seventy-five percent of the diarrhea improved group consumed the low-FODMAP EN formula. 38.5 and 46.2% of recurrent diarrhea/constipation improved group consumed the low- and moderate-FODMAP EN respectively. BMI significantly increased in all groups except the unimproved. Prealbumin levels significantly increased in the diarrhea-improved and recurrent diarrhea/constipation groups at 3-day and continued by 14-day, and in the constipation-improved group at 14-day. Transferrin levels significantly increased in the diarrhea-improved and recurrent diarrhea/constipation groups at 14-day.
CONCLUSION: Low-FODMAP EN may improve diarrhea, leading to improved nutritional status and facilitating prompt recovery from illness.

PMID 26530312
O'Brien L, Skidmore P, Wall C, Wilkinson T, Muir J, Frampton C, Gearry R.
A Low FODMAP Diet Is Nutritionally Adequate and Therapeutically Efficacious in Community Dwelling Older Adults with Chronic Diarrhoea.
Nutrients. 2020 Sep 30;12(10). doi: 10.3390/nu12103002. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
Abstract/Text The low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP)diet has been extensively researched, but not in the management of older adults with functional gastrointestinal symptoms. This study determines the positive and negative impacts of this dietary treatment in older adults with chronic diarrhea. A non-blinded intervention study was conducted with adults over 65 years with chronic diarrhea referred for colonoscopy where no cause was found. Participants followed a dietitian-led low FODMAP diet for six weeks and completed a structured assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale, and a four-day food diary before and after the intervention. Twenty participants, mean age 76 years, were recruited. Adherence to the low FODMAP diet was acceptable; mean daily FODMAP intake reduced from 20.82 g to 3.75 g (p < 0.001) during the intervention and no clinically significant changes in macro- or micronutrient intakes were observed. There were clinically significant improvements in total gastrointestinal symptoms (pre diet 21.15/88 (standard deviation SD = 10.99), post diet 9.8/88 (SD = 9.58), p < 0.001) including diarrhea (pre diet 9.85 (SD = 3.84), post diet 4.05 (SD = 3.86), p < 0.001) and significant reductions in anxiety (pre diet 6.11/21 (SD = 4.31), post diet 4.26/21 (SD = 3.38), p < 0.05). In older adults the low FODMAP diet is clinically effective and does not jeopardise nutritional intake when supervised by an experienced dietitian.

PMID 33007886
Fernández-Bañares F, Arau B, Raga A, Aceituno M, Tristán E, Carrasco A, Ruiz L, Martín-Cardona A, Ruiz-Ramírez P, Esteve M.
Long-Term Effect of a Gluten-Free Diet on Diarrhoea- or Bloating-Predominant Functional Bowel Disease: Role of the 'Low-Grade Coeliac Score' and the 'Coeliac Lymphogram' in the Response Rate to the Diet.
Nutrients. 2021 May 26;13(6). doi: 10.3390/nu13061812. Epub 2021 May 26.
Abstract/Text UNLABELLED: 1.
BACKGROUND: The long-term effect of a gluten-free diet (GFD) on functional bowel disorders (FBDs) has been scarcely studied. The aim was to assess the effect of a GFD on FBD patients, and to assess the role of both the low-grade coeliac score and coeliac lymphogram in the probability of response to a GFD. 2.
METHODS: 116 adult patients with either predominant diarrhoea or abdominal bloating, fulfilling Rome IV criteria of FBD, were treated with a GFD. Duodenum biopsies were performed for both pathology studies and intraepithelial lymphocyte subpopulation patterns. Coeliac lymphogram was defined as an increase in TCRγδ+ cells plus a decrease in CD3- cells. A low-grade coeliac score >10 was considered positive. 3.
RESULTS: Sustained response to GFD was observed in 72 patients (62%) after a median of 21 months of follow-up, who presented more often with coeliac lymphogram (37.5 vs. 11.4%; p = 0.02) and a score >10 (32 vs. 11.4%; p = 0.027) compared to non-responders. The frequency of low-grade coeliac enteropathy was 19.8%. 4.
CONCLUSION: A GFD is effective in the long-term treatment of patients with previously unexplained chronic watery diarrhoea- or bloating-predominant symptoms fulfilling the criteria of FBD. The response rate was much higher in the subgroup of patients defined by the presence of both a positive low-grade coeliac score and coeliac lymphogram.

PMID 34073569
Babb RR.
Coffee, sugars, and chronic diarrhea. Why a dietary history is important.
Postgrad Med. 1984 Jun;75(8):82, 86-7. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1984.11698635.
Abstract/Text Patients with chronic diarrhea should be carefully questioned about their diet. A correlation may be found between gastrointestinal symptoms and the ingestion of coffee, milk, or sugars such as sorbitol and fructose. If the offending agent can be identified and withdrawn from the diet, the diarrhea will stop and further evaluation can be avoided.

PMID 6728746
Quigley EMM.
Prebiotics and Probiotics in Digestive Health.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(2):333-344. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.028. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
Abstract/Text As the importance of the gut microbiota in health and disease is increasingly recognized interest in interventions that can modulate the microbiota and its interactions with its host has soared. Apart from diet, prebiotics and probiotics represent the most commonly used substances taken in an effort to sustain a healthy microbiome or restore balance when it is believed bacterial homeostasis has been disturbed in disease. While a considerable volume of basic science attests to the ability of various prebiotic molecules and probiotic strains to beneficially influence host immune responses, metabolic processes and neuro-endocrine pathways, the evidence base from human studies leaves much to be desired. This translational gap owes much to the manner in which this sector is regulated but also speaks to the challenges that confront the investigator who seeks to explore microbiota modulation in either healthy populations or those who suffer from common digestive ailments. For many products marketed as probiotics, some of the most fundamental issues relating to quality control, such as characterization, formulation, viability safety are scarcely addressed.

Copyright © 2019 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PMID 30267869
Yang B, Yue Y, Chen Y, Ding M, Li B, Wang L, Wang Q, Stanton C, Ross RP, Zhao J, Zhang H, Chen W.
Lactobacillus plantarum CCFM1143 Alleviates Chronic Diarrhea via Inflammation Regulation and Gut Microbiota Modulation: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.
Front Immunol. 2021;12:746585. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.746585. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
Abstract/Text Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea and functional diarrhea are both functional bowel disorders that cause chronic diarrhea. Chronic diarrhea is closely related to daily life and the psychological condition of diarrhea in patients, and probiotics can play a significant role in alleviating chronic diarrhea in some research. Lactobaccilus plantarum CCFM1143 can relieve diarrhea in mice caused by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC); however, its clinical effects remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the effects of CCFM1143 as a therapy for chronic diarrhea patients. Fifty-five patients with chronic diarrhea were randomly assigned into the probiotic group (n = 28) and the placebo group (n = 27), receiving the routine regimen with or without probiotics for 4 weeks, respectively. CCFM1143 can mitigate the apparent clinical symptoms and improve the health status and quality of life of patients. In addition, it could inhibit the increase in interleukin 6 (IL-6) and the decrease in motilin; modulate the short-chain fatty acids, especially acetic and propionic acids; and regulate the gut microbiota, particularly reducing the abundance of Bacteroides and Eggerthella and enriching the abundance of Akkermansia, Anaerostipes, and Terrisporobacter. In addition, treatment with probiotics showed clinical effectiveness in managing chronic diarrhea when compared with the placebo group. The findings could help to develop and further the application of probiotics for chronic diarrhea.

Copyright © 2021 Yang, Yue, Chen, Ding, Li, Wang, Wang, Stanton, Ross, Zhao, Zhang and Chen.
PMID 34721416
Jung M, Jung S, Kim N, Ahn H, Yun H, Kim KN.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum CJLP243 in Patients with Functional Diarrhea and High Fecal Calprotectin Levels.
Nutrients. 2022 Jan 17;14(2). doi: 10.3390/nu14020389. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
Abstract/Text Micro-inflammation in the gut, assessed by fecal calprotectin (FC), is considered a component of the pathogenesis of functional diarrhea (FD). Since probiotics may suppress micro-inflammation in the intestine by competing with harmful bacteria, we hypothesized that they would reduce the ratio of loose stool symptoms and gut inflammation in patients with FD. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the clinical and laboratory effects of Lactobacillus plantarum CJLP243 in FD patients with elevated FC levels for two months. Twenty-four patients diagnosed with FD with elevated FC levels were randomly assigned to either a probiotic group or a placebo group. After 2 months, 10 patients in the probiotic group and 12 patients in the placebo group completed the study, and FD symptoms, FC values, and intestinal flora were re-evaluated in these subjects. The percentage of subjects who had adequate FD relief (decrease in loose stool frequency) in the probiotic group was significantly increased after two months compared with the baseline. In addition, the probiotic group showed a statistically significant decrease in log-transformed FC values compared with the pre-treatment group, whereas the placebo group showed no difference before and after the intervention. Furthermore, the levels of Leuconostoc genus organisms in the gut microbiota composition in the probiotic group increased significantly after the end of the study compared with the baseline values. In this preliminary exploratory research, we found that two months of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum CJLP243 treatment resulted in FD symptom improvement, reduced FC values, and increased Leuconostoc levels, suggesting that the intake of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum was helpful in those patients. These findings need to be validated via further clinical studies.

PMID 35057571
日本消化器病学会編. 機能性消化管疾患診療ガイドライン2020――過敏性腸症候群(IBS) 改訂第2版. 南江堂, 2020.
Vasant DH, Paine PA, Black CJ, Houghton LA, Everitt HA, Corsetti M, Agrawal A, Aziz I, Farmer AD, Eugenicos MP, Moss-Morris R, Yiannakou Y, Ford AC.
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of irritable bowel syndrome.
Gut. 2021 Jul;70(7):1214-1240. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324598. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
Abstract/Text Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) remains one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders seen by clinicians in both primary and secondary care. Since publication of the last British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guideline in 2007, substantial advances have been made in understanding its complex pathophysiology, resulting in its re-classification as a disorder of gut-brain interaction, rather than a functional gastrointestinal disorder. Moreover, there has been a considerable amount of new evidence published concerning the diagnosis, investigation and management of IBS. The primary aim of this guideline, commissioned by the BSG, is to review and summarise the current evidence to inform and guide clinical practice, by providing a practical framework for evidence-based management of patients. One of the strengths of this guideline is that the recommendations for treatment are based on evidence derived from a comprehensive search of the medical literature, which was used to inform an update of a series of trial-based and network meta-analyses assessing the efficacy of dietary, pharmacological and psychological therapies in treating IBS. Specific recommendations have been made according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system, summarising both the strength of the recommendations and the overall quality of evidence. Finally, this guideline identifies novel treatments that are in development, as well as highlighting areas of unmet need for future research.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PMID 33903147
Allison MC, Sercombe J, Pounder RE.
A double-blind crossover comparison of lidamidine, loperamide and placebo for the control of chronic diarrhoea.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1988 Aug;2(4):347-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1988.tb00707.x.
Abstract/Text Fourteen patients with chronic diarrhoea, but no evidence of active organic disease, completed a double-blind crossover comparison of the anti-diarrhoeal effects of loperamide, placebo and the clonidine analogue, lidamidine. Failure of diarrhoea control led to early withdrawals from seven placebo- and six lidamidine-treatment periods, but there was only one early withdrawal during treatment with loperamide. Loperamide was found to be superior to lidamidine or placebo for the control of stool consistency in patients with chronic diarrhoea.

PMID 2979258
Sun WM, Read NW, Verlinden M.
Effects of loperamide oxide on gastrointestinal transit time and anorectal function in patients with chronic diarrhoea and faecal incontinence.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997 Jan;32(1):34-8. doi: 10.3109/00365529709025060.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: Loperamide improves anorectal function in patients with chronic diarrhoea. We wished to investigate whether the prodrug loperamide oxide has similar effects.
METHODS: Eleven patients with chronic diarrhoea and faecal incontinence participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study of the effects of loperamide oxide (4 mg twice daily for 1 week).
RESULTS: Loperamide oxide reduced wet stool weight and improved the patients' ratings of symptoms. Mouth-to-caecum transit time was not altered, but whole-gut transit time was prolonged. There were limited effects on anorectal function, but the mean minimum basal pressure mainly contributed by the internal anal sphincter (IAS) was increased, as was the mean volume infused before leakage occurred in the saline continence test.
CONCLUSION: Loperamide oxide is effective in the treatment of diarrhoea with faecal incontinence; normalization of colon transit time and an increase in the tone of the IAS seem to be the main determinants of efficacy.

PMID 9018764
常岡健二, 長廻紘, 星原芳雄ほか. 下痢症に対する塩酸ロペラミド(ロペラン細粒0.2%)の臨床評価. 薬理と治療, 1988; 16(10): 4303-12.
Walters JRF, Arasaradnam R, Andreyev HJN; UK Bile Acid Related Diarrhoea Network.
Diagnosis and management of bile acid diarrhoea: a survey of UK expert opinion and practice.
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2020;11(5):358-363. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101301. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
Abstract/Text OBJECTIVE: Bile acid diarrhoea (BAD), which includes bile acid malabsorption, causes a variety of digestive symptoms. Diagnostic rates and management vary considerably. We conducted a survey of current practice to review expert opinion and provide guidance on diagnosis and management.
DESIGN/METHOD: An online survey was conducted of clinical members of the UK Bile Acid Related Diarrhoea Network, who had all published research on BAD (n=21). Most were National Health Service consultants who had diagnosed over 50 patients with the condition.
RESULTS: The preferred terminology was to use BAD, with primary and secondary to classify causes. A wide range of presenting symptoms and associated conditions were recognised. SeHCAT (tauroselcholic acid) was the preferred diagnostic test, and 50% of respondents thought general practitioners should have access to this. Patients who met the Rome IV diagnostic criteria for functional diarrhoea, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with predominant diarrhoea or postcholecystectomy diarrhoea were usually investigated by SeHCAT, which was used sometimes in other types of IBS. Treatment with a bile acid sequestrant was offered to patients with low SeHCAT values, with expected response rates >70% in the most severe. Colestyramine was the usual sequestrant, starting between 2 g and 8 g daily; colesevelam was an alternative. In patients who had an incomplete response, increasing the dose, changing to an alternative sequestrant, use of loperamide and a low fat diet were suggested. Recommendations for follow-up and to improve the overall patient experience were made.
CONCLUSION: This expert survey indicates current best practice in the diagnosis and management of BAD.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PMID 32879719
Zimmerer T, Böcker U, Wenz F, Singer MV.
Medical prevention and treatment of acute and chronic radiation induced enteritis--is there any proven therapy? a short review.
Z Gastroenterol. 2008 May;46(5):441-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027150.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: Radiation enteritis is a severe problem in patients receiving irradiation of the abdomen or pelvis in the course of cancer treatment. Nevertheless, there is a lack of standardised strategies for medical prevention and therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PubMed based literature search was performed to address the available data on the prevention of and therapy for acute and chronic radiation enteritis.
RESULTS: Four double-blind and placebo-controlled studies used 5-aminosalycilates in the prevention of acute radiation enteritis. Only for sulphasalzine 2 g/d was a positive effect proven. Prophylactic administration of probiotics reduced the incidence of acute radiation enteritis in a large placebo-controlled trial. If acute radiation enteritis was present octreotide ameliorated radiation-induced diarrhoea in a randomised study. Two investigations, only one of them randomised, described the effectiveness of loperamide in the treatment of acute radiation enteritis. If diarrhoea was also the main symptom of chronic radiation enteritis, loperamide reduced stool frequency in a double-blind and placebo-controlled study. A retrospective analysis of severe cases of chronic radiation enteritis with obstruction and fistula indicated that parenteral nutrition at home was more effective than surgery.
CONCLUSION: Reduction of radiation dose and field size are still the most important factors in the prevention of acute and chronic radiation enteritis. Valid data particularly on the treatment of chronic radiation enteritis are lacking. A better understanding of the pathopysiology especially in chronic radiation enteritis might offer new therapeutic perspectives. Inhibition of TGF-beta, for example, might be a new promising therapy approach.

PMID 18461520
Benson AB 3rd, Ajani JA, Catalano RB, Engelking C, Kornblau SM, Martenson JA Jr, McCallum R, Mitchell EP, O'Dorisio TM, Vokes EE, Wadler S.
Recommended guidelines for the treatment of cancer treatment-induced diarrhea.
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 15;22(14):2918-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.132.
Abstract/Text PURPOSE: To update and expand on previously published clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of cancer treatment-induced diarrhea.
METHODS: An expert multidisciplinary panel was convened to review the recent literature and discuss recommendations for updating the practice guidelines previously published by this group in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 1998. MEDLINE searches were performed and the relevant literature published since 1998 was reviewed by all panel members. The treatment recommendations and algorithm were revised by panel consensus.
RESULTS: A recent review of early toxic deaths occurring in two National Cancer Institute-sponsored cooperative group trials of irinotecan plus high-dose fluorouracil and leucovorin for advanced colorectal cancer has led to the recognition of a life-threatening gastrointestinal syndrome and highlighted the need for vigilant monitoring and aggressive therapy for this serious complication. Loperamide remains the standard therapy for uncomplicated cases. However, the revised guidelines reflect the need for recognition of the early warning signs of complicated cases of diarrhea and the need for early and aggressive management, including the addition of antibiotics. Management of radiation-induced diarrhea is similar but may not require hospitalization, and chronic low- to intermediate-grade symptoms can be managed with continued loperamide.
CONCLUSION: With vigilant monitoring and aggressive therapy for cancer treatment-induced diarrhea, particularly in patients with early warning signs of severe complications, morbidity and mortality may be reduced.

PMID 15254061
Cann PA, Read NW, Holdsworth CD, Barends D.
Role of loperamide and placebo in management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).
Dig Dis Sci. 1984 Mar;29(3):239-47. doi: 10.1007/BF01296258.
Abstract/Text Symptom scores, stool data, and the transit of a standard, solid meal were measured in 28 patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) during baseline conditions and after five weeks of treatment with placebo and loperamide, given as a flexible dosage regime in the form of a double-blind, cross-over trial. All patients had undergone a comprehensive series of diagnostic investigations and had failed to respond to dietary supplementation with coarse wheat bran (10-30 g daily). Loperamide treatment accelerated gastric emptying, compared with placebo (1.2 +/- 0.1 vs 1.5 +/- 0.1 hr; P less than 0.001) and delayed both small bowel (6.2 +/- 0.3 vs 4.3 +/- 0.3 hr; P less than 0.001) and whole gut transit (56 +/- 5 vs 42 +/- 4 hr; P less than 0.01). Eighteen patients said they felt better taking loperamide compared with placebo and, at follow up, 15 of these patients remained satisfied with the effects of the drug. Most symptoms improved significantly on placebo compared with the baseline period, but three of these [diarrhea (P less than 0.01), urgency (P less than 0.01) and borborygmi (P less than 0.05)] showed a further significant improvement on loperamide. Improvement in diarrhea was not associated with any change in stool weight but was associated with reductions in stool frequency (P less than 0.001), passage of unformed stools (P less than 0.01), and incidence of urgency (P less than 0.001). Urgency was the only symptom that was significantly more common in the success group, compared with the group who did not feel better on loperamide.

PMID 6365490
Hovdenak N.
Loperamide treatment of the irritable bowel syndrome.
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1987;130:81-4. doi: 10.3109/00365528709091004.
Abstract/Text The effect of loperamide was investigated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 60 patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Active treatment was given in low dosage (4 mg nocte). The effect of treatment was assessed in clinical subgroups. In a group of patients with painless diarrhoea (n = 16) there was a highly significant improvement in stool frequency and consistency. In a group with alternating bowel habits and abdominal pain (n = 21) there was also a statistically significant improvement in stool frequency and consistency as well as significantly fewer painful days during loperamide treatment. Patients with alternating bowel habits and no pain (n = 12) experienced no symptomatic improvement, and patients with constipation (n = 9) generally felt worse on loperamide. No side effects were encountered. It is concluded that loperamide can be considered an alternative symptomatic treatment in some IBS patients whose main symptoms are painless diarrhoea or alternating bowel habits associated with abdominal pain.

PMID 3306904
Spinner HL, Lonardo NW, Mulamalla R, Stehlik J.
Ventricular tachycardia associated with high-dose chronic loperamide use.
Pharmacotherapy. 2015 Feb;35(2):234-8. doi: 10.1002/phar.1540. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
Abstract/Text Loperamide is an antidiarrheal medication deemed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as safe enough to be sold as an over-the-counter medicine. Unlike other μ-opioid receptor agonists, loperamide acts specifically in the myenteric plexus in the gastrointestinal tract, making the potential for abuse low and reports of toxicity extremely rare. We present a case of a patient previously in good health who developed episodes of cardiac pauses, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, and eventually runs of sustained ventricular tachycardia with hemodynamic instability. She required cardiopulmonary resuscitation, multiple cardioversions, and placement of a pacemaker. Her medical history was remarkable only for type 2 diabetes and chronic postcholecystectomy diarrhea. Metformin was the only prescription medication she was taking at the time of presentation. However, she reported that she had been taking an entire bottle of Equate brand loperamide (144 mg) daily for ~2 years. Loperamide overdoses associated with ventricular arrhythmias have been reported, but this is the first case to describe a serious ventricular arrhythmia associated with long-term use of a high dose of loperamide. Chronic overtreatment with loperamide may induce life-threatening arrhythmias.

© 2015 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.
PMID 25645123
Palmer KR, Corbett CL, Holdsworth CD.
Double-blind cross-over study comparing loperamide, codeine and diphenoxylate in the treatment of chronic diarrhea.
Gastroenterology. 1980 Dec;79(6):1272-5.
Abstract/Text As no adequate comparison of these widely used drugs has been made, we have performed a double-blind cross-over trial in 30 individuals with chronic diarrhea. Each underwent three randomized treatment periods of 4 wk duration. Patients were instructed to increase the daily dose gradually until control was achieved or side effects became intolerable. Stool frequency, consistency, urgency, and incontinence were then compared when a stable dose was reached. Though 2.3 capsules (4.6 mg) of loperamide, 2.3 capsules (103.5 mg) of codeine and 2.5 capsulses (12.5 mg) of diphenoxylate all reduced stool frequency to the same extent, diphenoxylate was significantly less effective in producing a solid stool. Before treatment 95% of patients experienced urgency, sometimes associated with fecal incontinence, often as their major diability. Loperamide and codeine were more effective in relieving this than was diphenoxylate. Side effects, particularly central nervous effects, were greatest with diphenoxylate and least with loperamide. Approximately equal numbers discontinued each preparation; poor control and central-nervous-system side effects were the usual reasons for stopping diphenoxylate and codeine, and abdominal pain and constipation for stopping loperamide. We conclude that both loperamide and codeine phosphate are superior to diphenoxylate in the symptomatic treatment of chronic diarrhea.

PMID 7002706
Pastrana T, Meißner W.
[Treatment of diarrhea with loperamide in palliative medicine. A systematic review].
Schmerz. 2013 Apr;27(2):182-9. doi: 10.1007/s00482-013-1296-z.
Abstract/Text Diarrhea is a distressing symptom which limits the quality of life in patients receiving palliative care and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In patients with AIDS, it is a more common problem than for other entities (e.g., cancer). Loperamide is considered the first choice medication for the symptomatic treatment of diarrhea. This literature review examines the efficacy of loperamide in the symptomatic treatment of diarrhea in palliative care. Two databases (Medline and Embase) were searched through June 2012. A total of 286 studies were identified, but only 7 met the inclusion criteria (1 cohort and 6 experimental studies) in which loperamide (alone or in combination) was tested. There is a lack of significant studies which investigate the efficacy of loperamide in the symptomatic treatment of diarrhea. Two trials indicated superiority of loperamide over placebo. In comparison with octreotide, the results were contradictory. The combination of acetorphan with loperamide was more effective than acetorphan alone, but the combination of loperamide with diphenoxylate was inferior to octreotide. The identified studies revealed methodical problems. A definite recommendation for administration of loperamide can, therefore, not be derived from this work.The English full-text version of this article is available at SpringerLink (under "Supplemental").

PMID 23475156
Gryboski JD, Hillemeier AC, Grill B, Kocoshis S.
Bismuth subsalicylate in the treatment of chronic diarrhea of childhood.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1985 Nov;80(11):871-6.
Abstract/Text Twenty-nine infants and children, age 2-70 months with chronic diarrhea, were admitted to a double-blind, parallel clinical trial. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive either a bismuth subsalicylate liquid or a placebo liquid formulation. Treatment was given for 7 days with dosage varied according to age. Analysis of the results showed that the subjects in the bismuth subsalicylate-treated group gained significantly more weight (p less than 0.05), had significantly fewer (p less than 0.01) and firmer (p less than 0.01) stools with less water content (p less than 0.01) during the course of the study than did the placebo-treated group. Response to treatment, as graded by nursing staff, family, and physicians was moderate to excellent in 86% of the treated group while none of the placebo group received such a rating (p less than 0.01). No differences were noted between stool weights or bile acid excretion.

PMID 3901731
Lembo AJ, Lacy BE, Zuckerman MJ, Schey R, Dove LS, Andrae DA, Davenport JM, McIntyre G, Lopez R, Turner L, Covington PS.
Eluxadoline for Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 21;374(3):242-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505180.
Abstract/Text Background Effective and safe treatments are needed for patients who have irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with diarrhea. We conducted two phase 3 trials to assess the efficacy and safety of eluxadoline, a new oral agent with mixed opioid effects (μ- and κ-opioid receptor agonist and δ-opioid receptor antagonist), in patients with IBS with diarrhea. Methods We randomly assigned 2427 adults who had IBS with diarrhea to eluxadoline (at a dose of 75 mg or 100 mg) or placebo twice daily for 26 weeks (IBS-3002 trial) or 52 weeks (IBS-3001 trial). The primary end point was the proportion of patients who had a composite response of decrease in abdominal pain and improvement in stool consistency on the same day for at least 50% of the days from weeks 1 through 12 and from weeks 1 through 26. Results For weeks 1 through 12, more patients in the eluxadoline groups (75 mg and 100 mg) than in the placebo group reached the primary end point (IBS-3001 trial, 23.9% with the 75-mg dose and 25.1% with the 100-mg dose vs. 17.1% with placebo; P=0.01 and P=0.004, respectively; IBS-3002 trial, 28.9% and 29.6%, respectively, vs. 16.2%; P<0.001 for both comparisons). For weeks 1 through 26, the corresponding rates in IBS-3001 were 23.4% and 29.3% versus 19.0% (P=0.11 and P<0.001, respectively), and the corresponding rates in IBS-3002 were 30.4% and 32.7% versus 20.2% (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). The most common adverse events associated with 75 mg of eluxadoline and 100 mg of eluxadoline, as compared with placebo, were nausea (8.1% and 7.5% vs. 5.1%), constipation (7.4% and 8.6% vs. 2.5%), and abdominal pain (5.8% and 7.2% vs. 4.1%). Pancreatitis developed in 5 (2 in the 75-mg group and 3 in the 100-mg group) of the 1666 patients in the safety population (0.3%). Conclusions Eluxadoline is a new therapeutic agent that reduced symptoms of IBS with diarrhea in men and women, with sustained efficacy over 6 months in patients who received the 100-mg dose twice daily. (Funded by Furiex Pharmaceuticals, an affiliate of Allergan; IBS-3001 and IBS-3002 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01553591 and NCT01553747 , respectively.).

PMID 26789872
Fukudo S, Ida M, Akiho H, Nakashima Y, Matsueda K.
Effect of ramosetron on stool consistency in male patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jun;12(6):953-9.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.11.024. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND & AIMS: Ramosetron, a serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine)-3 receptor antagonist with high selectivity, reduced stress-induced diarrhea and defecation caused by corticotropin-releasing hormone in rats. However, there have been no clinical trials of its effect in patients with diarrhea and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether ramosetron reduces diarrhea in these patients.
METHODS: Our study included 296 male outpatients with IBS-D treated at 52 centers in Japan. Patients were given 5 μg oral ramosetron (n = 147) or placebo (n = 149) once daily for 12 weeks after a 1-week baseline period. The primary end point was increased stool consistency in the first month. Secondary end points included relief of overall IBS symptoms and increased IBS-related quality of life.
RESULTS: More patients given ramosetron (74, 50.3%) than those given placebo (29, 19.6%) reported improved stool consistency in the first month (P < .001). The relative risk and number needed to treat were 2.57 (95% confidence interval, 1.79-3.70) and 3.25 (95% confidence interval, 2.44-4.89), respectively. The ramosetron group had significantly higher monthly rates of relief of overall IBS symptoms and IBS-related quality of life than the placebo group.
CONCLUSIONS: Ramosetron (5 μg oral, once daily for 12 weeks) improved stool consistency in male patients with IBS-D, compared with placebo. These study results, along with the pharmacologic profile of ramosetron, indicate that increased stool consistency is the best end point for studies of ramosetron in patients with IBS-D. Clinicaltrials.gov No, NCT01225237.

Copyright © 2014 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PMID 24315882
Fukudo S, Kinoshita Y, Okumura T, Ida M, Akiho H, Nakashima Y, Nishida A, Haruma K.
Ramosetron Reduces Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea and Improves Quality of Life in Women.
Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb;150(2):358-66.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.10.047. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND & AIMS: Previous studies have indicated that serotonin-3-receptor antagonists might have a sex-specific effect in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D). Alosetron has been approved for the treatment of only women, and ramosetron has been approved for the treatment for only men. We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study to determine whether ramosetron reduces symptoms of IBS-D in women.
METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 576 female outpatients with IBS-D (according to the Rome III criteria), from February 2013 through February 2014, at 70 academic Gastroenterology Departments in Japan. After a 1-week baseline period, subjects received either 2.5 μg ramosetron (n = 292) or placebo (n = 284) once daily for 12 weeks. Primary end points were the monthly rates of response for relief from overall IBS symptoms and increased stool consistency at the last evaluation point. Quality of life (QOL) also was quantified.
RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of patients given ramosetron reported global improvement (50.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 44.8-56.6) than patients given placebo (32.0%; 95% CI, 26.7-37.8)--a difference of 18.6% (95% CI, 10.7-26.5; P < .001). The relative risk was 1.58 (95% CI, 1.29-1.94) and the number needed to treat was 6 (95% CI, 4-10). A significantly higher proportion of patients in the ramosetron group reported increased stool consistency (40.8%; 95% CI, 35.1%-46.6%) than in the placebo group (24.3%; 95% CI, 19.4%-29.7%)--a difference of 16.5% (95% CI, 8.9%-24.0%; P < .001). Patients receiving ramosetron had significant reductions in abdominal pain and discomfort (P = .001) and greater improvement in QOL (P = .002) compared with placebo. Ramosetron induced constipation in 11.0% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled study of 576 women with IBS-D, 2.5 μg ramosetron per day reduced symptoms and increased stool consistency and QOL. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT01870895.

Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PMID 26551550
Glende M, Morselli-Labate AM, Battaglia G, Evangelista S.
Extended analysis of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 15-week study with otilonium bromide in irritable bowel syndrome.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002 Dec;14(12):1331-8. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200212000-00008.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: In order to follow the most recent developments and recommendations in trial methodology for drug evaluation in patients with irritable bowel syndrome, we performed an extended analysis of a large clinical trial from a previously published study of otilonium bromide, using an assessment that integrates the key symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A large-scale clinical trial with a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study design was conducted in 378 patients, treated for 15 weeks with the recommended standard dose of 40 mg otilonium bromide or placebo three times daily. The study was based on the collection of 12 single efficacy endpoints. The new efficacy assessment was based on the data reported by the patients. Rather than demonstrating score differences between the treatment groups of the study, we carried out an assessment that integrates the most frequent symptoms reported (pain frequency and intensity, presence of meteorism and distension) by the patient.
RESULTS: The rate of response to treatment within 2-4 months (the primary efficacy outcome measure) was significantly higher in the otilonium bromide group (36.9%) than in the placebo group (22.5%; P = 0.007). In each month of treatment, the rate of monthly response was higher in the otilonium bromide group as compared to the placebo group (P < 0.05). The total monthly and weekly responses to the single endpoints (intensity and frequency of pain and discomfort, meteorism/abdominal distension, severity of diarrhoea or constipation and mucus in the stool) were significantly more frequent in the group treated with otilonium bromide than in the placebo-treated group, with differences ranging from 10% to 20%. The subgroup analysis of the intestinal habits endpoint indicates that patients with diarrhoea have an additional benefit.
CONCLUSION: The present re-evaluation of a previously published study confirms that otilonium bromide is more effective than placebo for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome, being very efficient in relieving pain and discomfort.

PMID 12468954
Lee JH, Kim JI, Baeg MK, Sunwoo YY, Do K, Lee JH, Kim HJ, Choi JS, Kim J, Seo CS, Shin HK, Ha H, Park TY.
Effect of Samryungbaekchul-san Combined with Otilonium Bromide on Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
J Clin Med. 2019 Sep 27;8(10). doi: 10.3390/jcm8101558. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
Abstract/Text Conventional and herbal drugs are frequently used together to treat many disorders. Samryungbaekchul-san (SRS, a herbal formula) and otilonium bromide (OB, an antispasmodic agent) are widely used to treat diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (D-IBS) in Eastern Asian countries. However, there have been no studies on the co-administration of SRS and OB. Therefore, we aimed to preliminarily assess the feasibility of SRS combined with OB for D-IBS treatment in a pilot double-blind, four-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (RCT), including 80 patients diagnosed with D-IBS according to the Rome III criteria. The patients were randomly assigned to four treatment groups and were administered drugs for eight weeks after a two-week preparatory period. Follow-up was conducted four weeks after the administration period. The primary outcome was evaluated by using a global D-IBS symptom improvement score; no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups. However, multiple logistic regression analysis of primary outcome scores shows that SRS significantly improved D-IBS symptoms (p < 0.05). For secondary outcomes, better results were observed in the SRS + OB group, in terms of symptoms, including abdominal pain, discomfort, frequency of abdominal pain, and stool form than in OB alone or placebo groups (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the co-administration of SRS and OB might be an effective and safe strategy for the treatment of D-IBS. Large-scale RCTs are warranted to further confirm and clarify these findings.

PMID 31569833
Dobrilla G, Imbimbo BP, Piazzi L, Bensi G.
Longterm treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with cimetropium bromide: a double blind placebo controlled clinical trial.
Gut. 1990 Mar;31(3):355-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.31.3.355.
Abstract/Text The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of cimetropium bromide, a new antimuscarinic compound, in relieving symptoms of patients with irritable bowel syndrome over a three month period. Seventy consecutive outpatients were given cimetropium (50 mg tid) or placebo according to a double blind, randomised, parallel groups design. Symptoms were evaluated initially and at monthly intervals up to the end of the study period. One patient receiving placebo withdrew because of treatment failure. Pain score decreased by 40, 66, 85% in the cimetropium group, at the end of the first, second and third months respectively, compared with 26, 32 and 52% reductions among controls (p = 0.0005). At the end of treatment there was a 86% reduction in the number of abdominal pain episodes per day in the cimetropium group compared with 50% in the placebo group (p = 0.001). Constipation and diarrhoea scores decreased by 59 and 49% in the cimetropium treated patients, compared with 37 and 39% in controls, the differences between being not significant. At the end of the study 89% of the patients treated with cimetropium considered themselves as globally improved as opposed to 69% in the placebo group (p = 0.039). The corresponding 95% confidence intervals for the differences between the proportion of improved patients in the two groups were from 11% to 29%. Six patients taking cimetropium complained of slight dry mouth. The results of this study showed that cimetropium bromide is effective in relieving pain in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

PMID 2182401
佐々木大輔, 上原聡, 樋渡信夫ほか. 過敏性腸症候群に対する桂枝加芍薬湯の臨床効果――多施設共同無作為割付群間比較臨床試験. 臨牀と研究, 1998; 75(5): 1136-52.
備前敦. 心理的ストレスを伴う下痢型過敏性腸症候群に対する半夏瀉心湯(錠剤)の検討. 医学と薬学, 2012; 68(1): 127-33.
Cann PA, Read NW, Cammack J, Childs H, Holden S, Kashman R, Longmore J, Nix S, Simms N, Swallow K, Weller J.
Psychological stress and the passage of a standard meal through the stomach and small intestine in man.
Gut. 1983 Mar;24(3):236-40. doi: 10.1136/gut.24.3.236.
Abstract/Text Gastric emptying half-time and mouth to caecum transit time of a solid meal were measured in eight normal volunteers, once during a period of psychological stress and again during a period of relative calm. No consistent or significant effect on gastric emptying was observed, but mouth to caecum transit times were faster in all subjects and this difference was highly significant (p<0.01).

PMID 6826109
Savarino E, Zingone F, Barberio B, Marasco G, Akyuz F, Akpinar H, Barboi O, Bodini G, Bor S, Chiarioni G, Cristian G, Corsetti M, Di Sabatino A, Dimitriu AM, Drug V, Dumitrascu DL, Ford AC, Hauser G, Nakov R, Patel N, Pohl D, Sfarti C, Serra J, Simrén M, Suciu A, Tack J, Toruner M, Walters J, Cremon C, Barbara G.
Functional bowel disorders with diarrhoea: Clinical guidelines of the United European Gastroenterology and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility.
United European Gastroenterol J. 2022 Jul;10(6):556-584. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12259. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
Abstract/Text Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea (IBS-D) and functional diarrhoea (FDr) are the two major functional bowel disorders characterized by diarrhoea. In spite of their high prevalence, IBS-D and FDr are associated with major uncertainties, especially regarding their optimal diagnostic work-up and management. A Delphi consensus was performed with experts from 10 European countries who conducted a literature summary and voting process on 31 statements. Quality of evidence was evaluated using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation criteria. Consensus (defined as >80% agreement) was reached for all the statements. The panel agreed with the potential overlapping of IBS-D and FDr. In terms of diagnosis, the consensus supports a symptom-based approach also with the exclusion of alarm symptoms, recommending the evaluation of full blood count, C-reactive protein, serology for coeliac disease, and faecal calprotectin, and consideration of diagnosing bile acid diarrhoea. Colonoscopy with random biopsies in both the right and left colon is recommended in patients older than 50 years and in presence of alarm features. Regarding treatment, a strong consensus was achieved for the use of a diet low fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols, gut-directed psychological therapies, rifaximin, loperamide, and eluxadoline. A weak or conditional recommendation was achieved for antispasmodics, probiotics, tryciclic antidepressants, bile acid sequestrants, 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 antagonists (i.e. alosetron, ondansetron, or ramosetron). A multinational group of European experts summarized the current state of consensus on the definition, diagnosis, and management of IBS-D and FDr.

© 2022 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.
PMID 35695704
新垣昌利, 三宅達也, 狩野稔久ほか. ポリカルボフィルカルシウムを用いた経管栄養患者の便通異常に対する有効な導入法の検討. 消化器の臨床, 2006; 9: 204-8.
Toskes PP, Connery KL, Ritchey TW.
Calcium polycarbophil compared with placebo in irritable bowel syndrome.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1993 Feb;7(1):87-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1993.tb00074.x.
Abstract/Text Calcium polycarbophil was compared with placebo in 23 patients with irritable bowel syndrome in a six-month, randomized double-blind crossover study. Patients received polycarbophil tablets at a dosage of 6 g/day (twelve 0.5-g tablets) or matching placebo tablets. At study end, among patients expressing a preference, 15 of 21 (71%) chose polycarbophil over placebo for relief of the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome. Statistically significant differences favouring polycarbophil were found among the following patient subgroups: 15 (79%) of 19 with constipation: all six with alternating diarrhoea and constipation; 13 (87%) of 15 with bloating: and 11 (92%) of 12 with two or more symptoms. Polycarbophil was rated better than placebo in monthly global responses to therapy. Patient diary entries showed statistically significant improvement for ease of passage with polycarbophil. Polycarbophil was rated better than placebo for relief of nausea, pain, and bloating. The data suggest that calcium polycarbophil can benefit irritable bowel syndrome patients with constipation or alternating diarrhoea and constipation and may be particularly useful in patients with bloating as a major complaint.

PMID 8439642
Camilleri M, Kim DY, McKinzie S, Kim HJ, Thomforde GM, Burton DD, Low PA, Zinsmeister AR.
A randomized, controlled exploratory study of clonidine in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Mar;1(2):111-21. doi: 10.1053/cgh.2003.50019.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the alpha-2 adrenoreceptor agonist, clonidine, in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (D-IBS) in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial.
METHODS: A 2-week run-in evaluated baseline symptoms. Patients received 0.05, 0.1, or 0.2 mg clonidine or placebo twice a day for 4 weeks. We evaluated satisfactory relief of IBS by weekly question and stool parameters with a daily diary. Satisfactory relief and overall bowel function were primary end points. Secondary end points were stool frequency, consistency, and ease of passage; gut transit; and fasting and postprandial gastric volumes. Analysis followed intention-to-treat principles.
RESULTS: Forty-four D-IBS patients participated; there were 4 treatment-related dropouts: 2/2 in the 0.2-mg and 2/12 in the 0.05-mg clonidine groups. Proportion with satisfactory relief of IBS was 0.46, 0.42, and 0.67 with placebo, 0.05 mg, and 0.1 mg clonidine, respectively. Relief was sustained through 4 weeks of treatment, and bowel dysfunction (firmer stools and easier stool passage [P < 0.05]) was reduced with clonidine, 0.1 mg twice a day. Clonidine did not significantly alter gastrointestinal transit or gastric volumes. Drowsiness, dizziness, and dry mouth were the most common adverse events with the 0.1-mg dose; severity of adverse effects subsided after the first week of treatment. A trial to replicate 20% or more responders with clonidine will require 95 patients per treatment arm.
CONCLUSIONS: Clonidine, 0.1 mg twice a day for 4 weeks, relieves bowel dysfunction and appears promising for relief of D-IBS; these effects are unassociated with significant alterations in transit.

PMID 15017503
Fedorak RN, Field M, Chang EB.
Treatment of diabetic diarrhea with clonidine.
Ann Intern Med. 1985 Feb;102(2):197-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-102-2-197.
Abstract/Text Stimulation of alpha 2-adrenergic receptors on enterocytes promotes fluid and electrolyte absorption and inhibits anion secretion. Loss of adrenergic innervation may play a role in impaired intestinal fluid and electrolyte absorption in diabetic patients with autonomic neuropathy. Clonidine, an alpha 2-adrenergic agonist, was used to treat three patients with "idiopathic" diabetic diarrhea after other treatments had failed: The volume of diarrhea declined significantly (p less than 0.01). Diarrhea recurred when the drug was withdrawn, but the patient's condition improved again when clonidine treatment was reintroduced. Hypotension did not occur as a side effect presumably because of the autonomic neuropathy of these patients.

PMID 3966758
Viramontes BE, Malcolm A, Camilleri M, Szarka LA, McKinzie S, Burton DD, Zinsmeister AR.
Effects of an alpha(2)-adrenergic agonist on gastrointestinal transit, colonic motility, and sensation in humans.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001 Dec;281(6):G1468-76. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.2001.281.6.G1468.
Abstract/Text To characterize alpha(2)-adrenergic control of motor and sensory functions of gastrointestinal tract and colon, we studied dose-related effects of clonidine (placebo or up to 0.3 mg po) by random assignment in 55 healthy humans. Gastrointestinal transit was measured in all subjects; in 35, we assessed colonic compliance, tone, and sensations of gas and pain during phasic distensions. Clonidine did not significantly alter gastrointestinal or colonic transit, but it increased colonic compliance and reduced fasting tone without altering colonic response to a meal. Clonidine significantly reduced aggregate sensation to distensions overall and had significant linear dose-related sensory effects at 8- and 24-mmHg distensions. Effect on pain (including dose-response relationship) was due to 0.3-mg dose for distensions at 24 mmHg. We confirmed that clonidine relaxes fasting colonic tone and reduces sensation of pain. In this study, gut transit was not altered by clonidine, and novel dose-response characteristics and clonidine's effect on gas sensation are provided. Doses as low as 0.05 mg may be effective and potentially useful in reducing colonic tone and gas sensation.

PMID 11705752
Szilagyi A, Shrier I.
Systematic review: the use of somatostatin or octreotide in refractory diarrhoea.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Dec;15(12):1889-97. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.01114.x.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: Somatostatin and octreotide have multiple effects which make them ideal for treating diarrhoea of different aetiologies. Their use in a variety of conditions with refractory diarrhoea, however, is based on a limited number of studies.
AIM: We undertook a systematic review of the available English literature to maximize an evidence-based approach to the treatment of refractory diarrhoea. We tested the hypothesis that efficacy is independent of aetiology.
METHODS AND RESULTS: A Medline and individual article search from 1965 to 2000 was undertaken on the use of somatostatin and octreotide in diarrhoea. All reports containing at least five subjects were included. The percentage response in case series and randomized controlled trials was compared, and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials where patient level data were provided was carried out. There were 30 publications found (18 case series, 12 randomized controlled trials). The response percentage was 73% overall in case series and 64% in randomized controlled trials (not significant). A meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials revealed significant heterogeneity despite an overall relative risk of 0.5 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.91). Subgroup analysis of the largest aetiological groups showed that acquired immunodeficiency syndrome studies were homogeneous, but somatostatin and octreotide were less effective. Post-chemotherapy studies remained heterogeneous and somatostatin and octreotide were highly effective.
CONCLUSIONS: While this review strengthens the consensus guidelines on the use of somatostatin and octreotide for refractory diarrhoea, evidence-based support requires additional studies.

PMID 11736719
Bisschops R, De Ruyter V, Demolin G, Baert D, Moreels T, Pattyn P, Verhelst H, Lepoutre L, Arts J, Caenepeel P, Ooghe P, Codden T, Maisonobe P, Petrens E, Tack J.
Lanreotide Autogel in the Treatment of Idiopathic Refractory Diarrhea: Results of an Exploratory, Controlled, Before and After, Open-label, Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Trial.
Clin Ther. 2016 Aug;38(8):1902-1911.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
Abstract/Text PURPOSE: Chronic idiopathic diarrhea is the passage of loose stools >3 times daily, or a stool weight >200 g/d, persisting for >4 weeks without clear clinical cause. Patients refractory to standard anti-diarrhetics have limited treatment options. Somatostatin analogues have the ability to reduce gastrointestinal secretions and motility. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lanreotide Autogel(*) 120 mg in chronic idiopathic diarrhea.
METHODS: Other anti-diarrhetics were not allowed during the study and were stopped at screening. Patients received lanreotide Autogel 120 mg at baseline and day 28. Stool frequency and consistency (Bristol Stool Scale) were recorded; quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey and irritable bowel syndrome QoL questionnaires; adverse events were monitored. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a reduction of ≥50% or normalization to a mean of ≤3 stools/d at day 28.
FINDINGS: Thirty-three patients with >3 stools/d at baseline were included; mean (SD) age was 55.2 (16.4) years. Fourteen patients (42.4%) had a response to lanreotide Autogel at day 28 and 17 (51.5%) at day 56. Mean (SD) number of stools decreased significantly from 5.7 (2.2) at baseline to 3.7 (2.2) at day 56 overall (n = 32; P < 0.001). Significant and clinically meaningful improvements in disease-specific QoL were found in the overall populations. No new safety signals emerged.
IMPLICATIONS: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg decreased symptoms in these patients with chronic idiopathic refractory diarrhea, and meaningfully improved QoL. These finding have to be confirmed in further clinical trials. ClinicalTrials.gov
IDENTIFICATION: NCT00891371; Eudract CT 2009-009356-20.

Copyright © 2016 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.
PMID 27423779
薬剤監修について:
オーダー内の薬剤用量は日本医科大学付属病院 薬剤部 部長 伊勢雄也 以下、渡邉裕次、井ノ口岳洋、梅田将光および日本医科大学多摩永山病院 副薬剤部長 林太祐による疑義照会のプロセスを実施、疑義照会の対象については著者の方による再確認を実施しております。
※薬剤中分類、用法、同効薬、診療報酬は、エルゼビアが独自に作成した薬剤情報であり、 著者により作成された情報ではありません。
尚、用法は添付文書より、同効薬は、薬剤師監修のもとで作成しております。
※同効薬・小児・妊娠および授乳中の注意事項等は、海外の情報も掲載しており、日本の医療事情に適応しない場合があります。
※薬剤情報の(適外/適内/⽤量内/⽤量外/㊜)等の表記は、エルゼビアジャパン編集部によって記載日時にレセプトチェックソフトなどで確認し作成しております。ただし、これらの記載は、実際の保険適応の査定において保険適応及び保険適応外と判断されることを保証するものではありません。また、検査薬、輸液、血液製剤、全身麻酔薬、抗癌剤等の薬剤は保険適応の記載の一部を割愛させていただいています。
(詳細はこちらを参照)
著者のCOI(Conflicts of Interest)開示:
鎌田一宏 : 特に申告事項無し[2025年]
監修:山中克郎 : 特に申告事項無し[2025年]

ページ上部に戻る

慢性下痢

戻る