Long term domiciliary oxygen therapy in chronic hypoxic cor pulmonale complicating chronic bronchitis and emphysema. Report of the Medical Research Council Working Party.
Lancet. 1981 Mar 28;1(8222):681-6.
Abstract/Text
A controlled trial of long term domiciliary oxygen therapy has been carried out in three centres in the U.K. The 87 patients, all under 70 years of age, who took part had chronic bronchitis or emphysema with irreversible airways obstruction, severe arterial hypoxaemia, carbon dioxide retention, and a history of congestive heart failure. The patients were randomised to oxygen therapy (treated) or no oxygen (controls). Oxygen was given by nasal prongs for at least 15 h daily, usually at 2 1/min. The two groups were well matched, both clinically and in terms of lung function and other laboratory findings. 19 of the 42 oxygen treated patients died in the five years of survival follow-up compared with 30 out of 45 controls: in the 66 men in this trial the survival advantage of oxygen did not emerge until 500 days had elapsed. Survival for the 12 female controls was surprisingly poor, 8 of them being dead at 3 years. Mortality was not easy to predict, though a summation of arterial carbon dioxide tension and red cell mass was helpful. Neither time spent in hospital because of exacerbations of respiratory failure nor work attendance were affected by oxygen therapy, but these patients were very ill at the start of the trial and many had already retired on grounds of age or ill-health. Physiological measurements suggested that oxygen did not slow the progress of respiratory failure in those who died early. However, in longer term survivors on oxygen, arterial oxygenation did seem to stop deterioration.
Continuous or nocturnal oxygen therapy in hypoxemic chronic obstructive lung disease: a clinical trial. Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy Trial Group.
Ann Intern Med. 1980 Sep;93(3):391-8.
Abstract/Text
At six centers, 203 patients with hypoxemic chronic obstructive lung disease were randomly allocated to either continuous oxygen (O2) therapy or 12-hour nocturnal O2 therapy and followed for at least 12 months (mean, 19.3 months). The two groups were initially well matched in terms of physiological and neuropsychological function. Compliance with each oxygen regimen was good. Overall mortality in the nocturnal O2 therapy group was 1.94 times that in the continuous O2 therapy group (P = 0.01). This trend was striking in patients with carbon dioxide retention and also present in patients with relatively poor lung function, low mean nocturnal oxygen saturation, more severe brain dysfunction, and prominent mood disturbances. Continuous O2 therapy also appeared to benefit patients with low mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance and those with relatively well-preserved exercise capacity. We conclude that in hypoxemic chronic obstructive lung disease, continuous O2 therapy is associated with a lower mortality than is nocturnal O2 therapy. The reason for this difference is not clear.
S Rennard, M Carrera, A G Agustí
Management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: are we going anywhere?
Eur Respir J. 2000 Dec;16(6):1035-6.
Abstract/Text
植木 純（監修）、福地 義之助：呼吸を楽にして健康増進―呼吸のセルフマネジメント― 照林社、2011.
日本呼吸器学会COPDガイドライン第6版作成委員会編：COPD(慢性閉塞性肺疾患)診断と治療のためのガイドライン 第6版．メディカルレビュー社、2022.
「診療報酬の算定方法の一部改正に伴う実施上の留意事項について(通知)平成24年3月5日保医発0305第1号.
Kazuma Nagata, Takashi Kikuchi, Takeo Horie, Akira Shiraki, Takamasa Kitajima, Toru Kadowaki, Fumiaki Tokioka, Naohiko Chohnabayashi, Akira Watanabe, Susumu Sato, Keisuke Tomii
Domiciliary High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy for Patients with Stable Hypercapnic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Multicenter Randomized Crossover Trial.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Apr;15(4):432-439. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201706-425OC.
Abstract/Text
RATIONALE: A growing evidence base suggests a benefit of using high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in the acute setting. However, the clinical benefit of domiciliary use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease remains unclear.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy use in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized crossover trial comparing high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy plus long-term oxygen therapy with long-term oxygen therapy only in 32 adults with stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Participants were randomized to receive either 6 weeks of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy/long-term oxygen therapy using the myAIRVO 2 device followed by another 6 weeks of long-term oxygen therapy only or long-term oxygen therapy only followed by high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy/long-term oxygen therapy. The primary outcome was the change in quality of life as assessed by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A linear mixed-effects model was used to account for treatment effect, time effect, allocation effect, and participant effect.
RESULTS: Of 32 study participants, 29 completed the study. At the end of 12 weeks, high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy/long-term oxygen therapy treatment improved the mean total St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease score compared with long-term oxygen therapy only (7.8 points; 95% confidence interval, 3.7 to 11.9; P < 0.01). Similarly, high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy/long-term oxygen therapy treatment improved the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (adjusted treatment effect, -4.1 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -6.5 to -1.7 mm Hg), pH (adjusted treatment effect, +0.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.01 to 0.02), and median nocturnal transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure (adjusted treatment effect, -5.1 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -8.4 to -1.8 mm Hg). High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy/long-term oxygen therapy treatment did not improve the arterial partial pressure of oxygen, dyspnea, spirometry, lung volume, 6-minute walk test, or physical activity. The most frequent high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy-related adverse event encountered was nocturnal sweating (n = 6 [20.7%]). Four severe adverse events occurred (two in each group) and were deemed unrelated to the intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Six weeks of treatment with high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy improved health-related quality of life and reduced hypercapnia in patients with stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02545855) and www.umin/ac.jp (UMIN000017639).
Line Hust Storgaard, Hans-Ulrich Hockey, Birgitte Schantz Laursen, Ulla Møller Weinreich
Long-term effects of oxygen-enriched high-flow nasal cannula treatment in COPD patients with chronic hypoxemic respiratory failure.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018;13:1195-1205. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S159666. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
Abstract/Text
BACKGROUND: This study investigated the long-term effects of humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in COPD patients with chronic hypoxemic respiratory failure treated with long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 200 patients were randomized into usual care ± HFNC. At inclusion, acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) and hospital admissions 1 year before inclusion, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) score, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) were recorded. Patients completed phone interviews at 1, 3 and 9 months assessing mMRC score and AECOPD since the last contact. At on-site visits (6 and 12 months), mMRC, number of AECOPD since last contact and SGRQ were registered and FEV1, FEV1%, PaCO2 and, at 12 months, 6MWT were reassessed. Hospital admissions during the study period were obtained from hospital records. Hours of the use of HFNC were retrieved from the high-flow device.
RESULTS: The average daily use of HFNC was 6 hours/day. The HFNC group had a lower AECOPD rate (3.12 versus 4.95/patient/year, p<0.001). Modeled hospital admission rates were 0.79 versus 1.39/patient/year for 12- versus 1-month use of HFNC, respectively (p<0.001). The HFNC group had improved mMRC scores from 3 months onward (p<0.001) and improved SGRQ at 6 and 12 months (p=0.002, p=0.033) and PaCO2 (p=0.005) and 6MWT (p=0.005) at 12 months. There was no difference in all-cause mortality.
CONCLUSION: HFNC treatment reduced AECOPD, hospital admissions and symptoms in COPD patients with hypoxic failure.
