今日の臨床サポート 今日の臨床サポート

著者: 篠原 浩 京都大学大学院医学研究科 臨床病態検査学/京都市立病院 感染症内科(非常勤)

監修: 山本舜悟 大阪大学大学院医学系研究科 変革的感染制御システム開発学

著者校正/監修レビュー済:2024/05/29
参考ガイドライン:
  1. 診断:
  1. 欧州皮膚科性病科学会議(EADV): European consensus-based (S2k) Guideline on the Management of Herpes Zoster – guided by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) in cooperation with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), Part 1: Diagnosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31:9-19.
  1. 治療:
  1. 欧州皮膚科性病科学会議(EADV): European consensus-based (S2k) Guideline on the Management of Herpes Zoster – guided by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) in cooperation with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), Part 2: Treatment. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31:20-29.
  1. 感染対策:
  1. 医療感染管理諮問委員会(HICPAC)):2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings. Am J Infect Control. 2007 Dec;35(10 Suppl 2):S65-164.
  1. ワクチン:
  1. 米国感染症学会(IDSA)2013 IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline for Vaccination of the Immunocompromised Host. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:e44-100.
  1. ガイドラインの体裁ではないが、エビデンスに基づくマネジメントの推奨を与えるもの:
  1. 米国感染症学会(IDSA)Recommendations for the Management of Herpes Zoster. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:S1-26.
  1. アメリカ疾病対策予防センター(CDC)Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for Use of Herpes Zoster Vaccines. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67:103-8.
  1. 米国予防接種実施に関する諮問委員会(AICP):Use of Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in Immunocompromised Adults Aged ≥19 Years: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — United States, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71:80-4.
患者向け説明資料

改訂のポイント:
  1. 定期レビューを行い、アメナメビルおよび帯状疱疹ワクチンについて加筆修正を行い、文献を追加した。
  1. 2017年に承認されたアメナメビル(アメナリーフ)は、2023年に市販後調査の結果をまとめた論文が発表され、有害事象が生じたのは0.77%と安全性は高いと考えられるが、シングルアームの試験のため、有効性について既存の薬剤やプラセボとの比較はされていない(Imafuku S, et al. J Dermatol. 2023 Oct;50(10):1287-1300.)。播種性帯状疱疹や免疫不全患者での使用についての有効性のエビデンスは2023年時点では非常に乏しく、こうした患者に対する使用を推奨する根拠は乏しい。
  1. 弱毒生水痘ワクチンについては、2019年に発表されたメタ・アナリシス解析では、50歳以上の成人を対象とした有効性は、帯状疱疹、帯状疱疹後神経痛、眼部帯状疱疹に対してそれぞれ49.7%、59.7%、30.0%と報告されている(Mbinta JF, et al. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022 Apr;3(4):e263-e275.)。
  1. 組換え帯状疱疹ワクチンの市販後のコホート研究では、免疫不全ではない人口を対象とした場合、帯状疱疹に対する効果は85.5%と報告されている(Sun Y, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 15;73(6):949-956.)。また、免疫不全を含む人口を対象とした場合は、帯状疱疹および帯状疱疹後神経痛に対する効果はそれぞれ70.1%、76.0%と報告されている(Izurieta HS, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 15;73(6):941-948.)。
    免疫不全者の帯状疱疹に対する効果は患者背景により異なるが、68.2~90.5%と報告されている(Bastidas A, et al. JAMA. 2019 Jul 9;322(2):123-133.、Dagnew AF, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Sep;19(9):988-1000.、 Dagnew AF, et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Mar 2;60(3):1226-1233.)。これらの結果を受け、米国では19歳以上の免疫抑制患者には帯状疱疹予防として組み換え帯状疱疹ワクチンが推奨されている(Anderson TC, et al. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 21;71(3):80-84.)。

概要・推奨   

  1. 帯状疱疹とは、脊髄後根神経節に潜伏感染した水痘・帯状疱疹ウイルス(VZV)の再活性化により、デルマトームに沿った痛みを伴う水疱を発症する皮膚疾患である。
  1. 疾患の頻度は高く、特に65歳以上の年齢では頻度が3倍以上に上昇することが知られている。
  1. 症状はデルマトームに沿った特徴的な皮疹と痛みがみられる。皮疹は通常癒合傾向と発赤を伴う丘疹として発症し、時間経過とともに水疱が出現した後に痂皮を形成しながら治癒する。重症度によっては発赤が軽微であることや水疱が出現しないこともある。免疫抑制状態にある患者では、複数のデルマトームにわたって発症することや、皮疹が典型的ではないこともあり他疾患との鑑別が重要である。
アカウントをお持ちの方はログイン
  1. 閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧に
  1. 閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契
  1. 閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧に
  1. 閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要
  1. 閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となりま
  1. 閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧には
  1. 閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要となります。閲覧にはご契約が必要と

病態・疫学・診察 

疾患情報(疫学・病態)  
  1. 帯状疱疹とは、脊髄後根神経節に潜伏感染した水痘・帯状疱疹ウイルス(VZV)の再活性化により、デルマトームに沿った痛みを伴う水疱を発症する皮膚疾患である。
  1. 帯状疱疹の診断は、デルマトームに沿った特徴的な皮疹と痛みを確認することにより行う。
  1. 疾患の頻度は高く、特に65歳以上の年齢では頻度が3倍以上に上昇することが知られている。
  1. 眼窩に及ぶ帯状疱疹は、重篤な眼科的合併症を来す頻度が高く、緊急に眼科コンサルトを要する。
  1. 若年者で他にリスクの見当たらない患者が帯状疱疹を発症した場合、HIV感染症や自己免疫疾患などの存在を疑う必要がある。
  1. 免疫抑制患者では、非定型的な分布で発症することや、皮疹を伴わずに発症すること(zoster sine herpete)、肺炎・脳炎・網膜炎などの合併症を来すこともある。
問診・診察のポイント  
  1. ごく初期の帯状疱疹は痛みから発症して皮疹を後から発症することもあり、特定のデルマトームに限局した急性痛をみた場合には帯状疱疹も鑑別に挙げる必要がある。

これより先の閲覧には個人契約のトライアルまたはお申込みが必要です。

最新のエビデンスに基づいた二次文献データベース「今日の臨床サポート」。
常時アップデートされており、最新のエビデンスを各分野のエキスパートが豊富な図表や処方・検査例を交えて分かりやすく解説。日常臨床で遭遇するほぼ全ての症状・疾患から薬剤・検査情報まで瞬時に検索可能です。

まずは15日間無料トライアル
本サイトの知的財産権は全てエルゼビアまたはコンテンツのライセンサーに帰属します。私的利用及び別途規定されている場合を除き、本サイトの利用はいかなる許諾を与えるものでもありません。 本サイト、そのコンテンツ、製品およびサービスのご利用は、お客様ご自身の責任において行ってください。本サイトの利用に基づくいかなる損害についても、エルゼビアは一切の責任及び賠償義務を負いません。 また、本サイトの利用を以て、本サイト利用者は、本サイトの利用に基づき第三者に生じるいかなる損害についても、エルゼビアを免責することに合意したことになります。  本サイトを利用される医学・医療提供者は、独自の臨床的判断を行使するべきです。本サイト利用者の判断においてリスクを正当なものとして受け入れる用意がない限り、コンテンツにおいて提案されている検査または処置がなされるべきではありません。 医学の急速な進歩に鑑み、エルゼビアは、本サイト利用者が診断方法および投与量について、独自に検証を行うことを推奨いたします。

文献 

K R Beutner, D J Friedman, C Forszpaniak, P L Andersen, M J Wood
Valaciclovir compared with acyclovir for improved therapy for herpes zoster in immunocompetent adults.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Jul;39(7):1546-53.
Abstract/Text Acyclovir treatment of acute herpes zoster speeds rash healing and decreases pain and ocular complications. The limited oral bioavailability of acyclovir necessitates frequent dosing. Valaciclovir, the l-valyl ester of acyclovir, is rapidly and almost completely converted to acyclovir in vivo and gives three- to fivefold increases in acyclovir bioavailability. In a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, the safety and efficacy of oral valaciclovir given at a dosage of 1,000 mg three times daily for 7 or 14 days and oral acyclovir given at a dosage of 800 mg five times daily for 7 days were compared in immunocompetent adults aged > or = 50 years with herpes zoster. Patients were evaluated for 6 months. The intent-to-treat analysis (1,141 patients) showed that valaciclovir for 7 or 14 days significantly accelerated the resolution of herpes zoster-associated pain (P = 0.001 and P = 0.03, respectively) compared with acyclovir; median pain durations were 38 and 44 days, respectively, versus 51 days for acyclovir. Treatment with valaciclovir also significantly reduced the duration of postherpetic neuralgia and decreased the proportion of patients with pain persisting for 6 months (19.3 versus 25.7%). However, there were no differences between treatments in pain intensity or quality-of-life measures. Cutaneous manifestations resolved at similar rates in all groups. Adverse events were similar in nature and prevalence among groups, and no clinically important changes occurred in hematology or clinical chemistry parameters. Thus, in the management of immunocompetent patients > or = 50 years of age with localized herpes zoster, valaciclovir given at 1,000 mg three times daily for 7 days accelerates the resolution of pain and offers simpler dosing, while it maintains the favorable safety profile of acyclovir.

PMID 7492102
TA Perry, R Merlin, BV Shanabrook, J Comas
Observation of resonant impurity states in semiconductor quantum-well structures.
Phys Rev Lett. 1985 Jun 17;54(24):2623-2626. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.2623.
Abstract/Text
PMID 10031393
Jennifer F Wilson
In the clinic. Herpes zoster.
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Mar 1;154(5):ITC31-15; quiz ITC316. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-5-201103010-01003.
Abstract/Text This issue provides a clinical overview of herpes zoster focusing on prevention, diagnosis, treatment, practice improvement, and patient information. Readers can complete the accompanying CME quiz for 1.5 credits. Only ACP members and individual subscribers can access the electronic features of In the Clinic. Non-subscribers who wish to access this issue of In the Clinic can elect "Pay for View." Subscribers can receive 1.5 category 1 CME credits by completing the CME quiz that accompanies this issue of In the Clinic. The content of In the Clinic is drawn from the clinical information and education resources of the American College of Physicians (ACP), including PIER (Physicians' Information and Education Resource) and MKSAP (Medical Knowledge and Self Assessment Program). Annals of Internal Medicine editors develop In the Clinic from these primary sources in collaboration with the ACP's Medical Education and Publishing division and with assistance of science writers and physician writers. Editorial consultants from PIER and MKSAP provide expert review of the content. Readers who are interested in these primary resources for more detail can consult www.acponline.org, http://pier.acponline.org, and other resources referenced within each issue of In the Clinic.

PMID 21357905
Makoto Kawashima, Osamu Nemoto, Mariko Honda, Daisuke Watanabe, Juichiro Nakayama, Shinichi Imafuku, Toshiyuki Kato, Tsuneo Katsuramaki, study investigators
Amenamevir, a novel helicase-primase inhibitor, for treatment of herpes zoster: A randomized, double-blind, valaciclovir-controlled phase 3 study.
J Dermatol. 2017 Nov;44(11):1219-1227. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.13948. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
Abstract/Text Amenamevir is a potent helicase-primase inhibitor and a novel class of antiviral agent other than nucleoside compounds, such as aciclovir, valaciclovir and famciclovir. This study is the first randomized, double-blind, valaciclovir-controlled phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of amenamevir in Japanese patients with herpes zoster when treated within 72 h after onset of rash. A total of 751 patients were randomly assigned to receive either amenamevir 400 mg or 200 mg p.o. once daily or valaciclovir 1000 mg three times daily (daily dose, 3000 mg) for 7 days. The primary efficacy end-point was the proportion of cessation of new lesion formation by day 4 ("day 4 cessation proportion"). The day 4 cessation proportions for amenamevir 400 and 200 mg and valaciclovir were 81.1% (197/243), 69.6% (172/247) and 75.1% (184/245), respectively. Non-inferiority of amenamevir 400 mg to valaciclovir was confirmed by a closed testing procedure. Days to cessation of new lesion formation, complete crusting, healing, pain resolution and virus disappearance were evaluated as secondary end-points. No significant differences were observed in any of the treatment groups. Amenamevir 400 and 200 mg were well tolerated as well as valaciclovir. The proportions of patients who experienced drug-related adverse events were 10.0% (25/249), 10.7% (27/252) and 12.0% (30/249) with amenamevir 400 and 200 mg and valaciclovir, respectively. In conclusion, amenamevir 400 mg appears to be effective and well tolerated for treatment of herpes zoster in immunocompetent Japanese patients.

© 2017 The Authors. The Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Dermatological Association.
PMID 28681394
Shinich Imafuku, Kenta Korematsu, Naoko Mori, Tsuyoshi Kani, Keita Matsui
Real-world safety and efficacy of amenamevir in patients with herpes zoster in Japan: A postmarketing observational study (REWARD).
J Dermatol. 2023 Oct;50(10):1287-1300. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16876. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
Abstract/Text The helicase-primase inhibitor amenamevir (AMNV) was approved for herpes zoster in Japan in 2017. The authors conducted a 1-month postmarketing observational study to evaluate the real-world safety and efficacy (cutaneous improvement and pain resolution) of AMNV in patients with herpes zoster. Of the 3453 patients registered between March 2018 and December 2020, 3110 were included in the safety analyses. The mean age (±standard deviation) was 63.7 ± 17.5 years, with 57.9% of patients aged ≥65 years. Most patients had mild (53.3%) or moderate (41.0%) cutaneous lesions. Regarding pain, 43.9%, 25.6%, and 12.5% of patients had pain at the levels of 1-3, 4-6, and 7-10 on the numerical rating scale. In total, 30.0%, 27.2%, and 16.1% of patients were concomitantly treated with analgesics: acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and Ca2+ channel α 2δ ligands, respectively, and 10.6% were treated with topical antiherpetic drugs. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 0.77% of patients, including four serious adverse drug reactions in four patients (hyponatremia, thrombocytopenia, rash, and rhabdomyolysis). Regarding important potential risks, renal disorder, cardiovascular events, and decreased platelets were observed in one, one, and two patients, respectively. Concerning efficacy, the cutaneous improvement rate (significantly improved or improved) was 95.5%, with significantly higher improvement rates in patients treated with AMNV for 7 days and in patients with less severe cutaneous lesions or less pain. Factors affecting the time to pain resolution were the severity of cutaneous lesions and pain at the start of AMNV treatment and older age. This study demonstrated that the AMNV is safe and effective in patients with herpes zoster in a real-world clinical setting.

© 2023 Japanese Dermatological Association.
PMID 37401122
S Tyring, R A Barbarash, J E Nahlik, A Cunningham, J Marley, M Heng, T Jones, T Rea, R Boon, R Saltzman
Famciclovir for the treatment of acute herpes zoster: effects on acute disease and postherpetic neuralgia. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Collaborative Famciclovir Herpes Zoster Study Group.
Ann Intern Med. 1995 Jul 15;123(2):89-96.
Abstract/Text OBJECTIVE: To document the effects of treatment with famciclovir on the acute signs and symptoms of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia.
DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial.
SETTING: 36 centers in the United States, Canada, and Australia.
PATIENTS: 419 immunocompetent adults with uncomplicated herpes zoster.
INTERVENTION: Patients were assigned within 72 hours of rash onset to famciclovir, 500 mg; famciclovir, 750 mg; or placebo, three times daily for 7 days.
MEASUREMENTS: Lesions were assessed daily for as long as 14 days until full crusting occurred and then weekly until the lesions healed. Viral cultures were obtained daily while vesicles were present. Pain was assessed at each of the visits at which lesions were examined and then monthly for 5 months after the lesions healed. Safety was assessed throughout the study.
RESULTS: Famciclovir was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that of placebo. Famciclovir accelerated lesion healing and reduced the duration of viral shedding. Most importantly, famciclovir recipients had faster resolution of postherpetic neuralgia (approximately twofold faster) than placebo recipients; differences between the placebo group and both the 500-mg famciclovir group (hazard ratio, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.1 to 2.7]) and the 750-mg famciclovir group (hazard ratio, 1.9 [CI, 1.2 to 2.9]) were statistically significant (P = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). The median duration of postherpetic neuralgia was reduced by approximately 2 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Oral famciclovir, 500 mg or 750 mg three times daily for 7 days, is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for herpes zoster that decreases the duration of the disease's most debilitating complication, postherpetic neuralgia.

PMID 7778840
Stephen D Shafran, Stephen K Tyring, Richard Ashton, Jacque Decroix, Chistine Forszpaniak, Alan Wade, Christian Paulet, Daniel Candaele
Once, twice, or three times daily famciclovir compared with aciclovir for the oral treatment of herpes zoster in immunocompetent adults: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind clinical trial.
J Clin Virol. 2004 Apr;29(4):248-53. doi: 10.1016/S1386-6532(03)00164-1.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: Famciclovir, the well absorbed oral pro-drug of penciclovir, is effective in the treatment of herpes zoster when given three times daily. Because the intracellular half-life of penciclovir triphosphate in varicella-zoster virus (VZV)-infected cells (7h) is considerably longer than that of aciclovir triphosphate (1h), it may be possible to administer famciclovir less frequently than three times daily for herpes zoster: aciclovir is administered five times daily.
METHODS: 559 immunocompetent adults presenting with herpes zoster whose skin lesions were present for less than 72 h were randomized to receive famciclovir 750 mg once daily (od), 500 mg twice daily (bid), or 250 mg three times daily (tid), or aciclovir 800 mg five times daily. All treatments were given for 7 days. Participants were evaluated until complete healing or for 4 weeks, whichever occurred first.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the four treatment groups with respect to times to full crusting; loss of vesicles, ulcers and crusts; cessation of new lesion formation; a 50% reduction in the area of affected skin; and the loss of acute pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Famciclovir 750 mg once daily, 500 mg twice daily and 250 mg daily, and aciclovir 800 mg five times daily are three times comparable in efficacy with respect to the cutaneous healing of herpes zoster. The current study was not designed to assess the effects of the treatments on postherpetic neuralgia (PHN).

PMID 15018852
M J Wood, R Kay, R H Dworkin, S J Soong, R J Whitley
Oral acyclovir therapy accelerates pain resolution in patients with herpes zoster: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials.
Clin Infect Dis. 1996 Feb;22(2):341-7.
Abstract/Text Meta-analysis of four double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of oral acyclovir (800 mg five times daily) for the treatment of herpes zoster was conducted to provide definitive assessments of the effect of acyclovir on the resolution of zoster-associated pain. The studies involved a total of 691 patients, and the analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis. A range of milestones of pain cessation were evaluated by means of Cox regression models with adjustment for relevant prognostic factors. The proportion of patients with postherpetic neuralgia at 3 and 6 months was also determined. Advancing age and more severe pain at presentation were associated with more prolonged pain. Acyclovir was clearly shown to accelerate pain resolution by all of the measures employed. Benefit was especially evident in patients 50 years of age or older. Fewer acyclovir recipients had postherpetic neuralgia at 3 or 6 months. Overall, the reductions of pain duration and prevalence were approximately twofold.

PMID 8838194
D Bowsher
The effects of pre-emptive treatment of postherpetic neuralgia with amitriptyline: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997 Jun;13(6):327-31.
Abstract/Text Seventy-two patients older than 60 years of age who received a diagnosis of herpes zoster (HZ) were entered into a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of daily amitriptyline 25 mg. Treatment with either amitriptyline or placebo continued for 90 days after diagnosis. Pain prevalence at 6 months was the primary outcome. Results showed that early treatment with low-dose amitriptyline reduced pain prevalence by more than one-half (p < 0.05; odds ratio, 2.9:1) This finding makes a strong case for the pre-emptive administration of amitriptyline, in combination with an antiviral drug, to elderly patients with acute herpes zoster.

PMID 9204652
James D Berry, Karin Lottrup Petersen
A single dose of gabapentin reduces acute pain and allodynia in patients with herpes zoster.
Neurology. 2005 Aug 9;65(3):444-7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000168259.94991.8a.
Abstract/Text This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study measured the effect of a single dose of oral gabapentin (900 mg) on pain and allodynia associated with herpes zoster. Pain severity decreased by 66% with gabapentin compared to 33% with placebo. Reductions in allodynia area and severity, and overall pain relief, were also greater with gabapentin.

PMID 16087911
L He, D Zhang, M Zhou, C Zhu
Corticosteroids for preventing postherpetic neuralgia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD005582. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005582.pub2. Epub 2008 Jan 23.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: Postherpetic neuralgia is a common serious complication of herpes zoster. Corticosteroids are anti-inflammatory and might be beneficial.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of corticosteroids in preventing postherpetic neuralgia.
SEARCH STRATEGY: Search for randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials for corticosteroids for preventing postherpetic neuralgia in MEDLINE (1950 to 2006), EMBASE (1980 to 2006), LILACS (1982 to 2005), the Chinese Biomedical Retrieval System (1978 to 2006) and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2006). Date of most recent search: September 2006.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Types of studies: quasi-randomised or randomised controlled trials.
TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS: people of all ages with herpes zoster of all degrees of severity within seven days after onset. Types of interventions: all kinds of corticosteroids given by oral, intramuscular or intravenous routes during the acute stage (starting within one week of onset of the rash) compared with no treatment or placebo, but not with other treatments. We also included trials which compared corticosteroids plus routine treatment with placebo plus routine treatment. Types of outcome measures: Primary: the presence of postherpetic neuralgia six months after the onset of the acute herpetic rash. Secondary: pain severity measured by a validated visual analogue scale or numerical descriptive scale after three, six and 12 months; quality of life measured with the short form 36 questionnaire after six months; adverse events during or within two weeks after stopping treatment.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted by two independent reviewers.
MAIN RESULTS: Five trials were included with altogether 787 participants. All were randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group studies. Our primary outcome measure was the presence of postherpetic neuralgia six months after the onset of the acute herpetic rash. There was no significant difference between the corticosteroid and control groups for the primary outcome (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.20 to 7.97). There was also no significant difference between the corticosteroid plus antiviral agents and placebo plus antiviral agents groups for the primary outcome (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.40 to 2.03). No included trials evaluated pain severity with a validated visual analogue scale or numerical descriptive scale and also no trials measured quality of life with the Short Form 36 questionnaire. Adverse events during or within two weeks after stopping treatment were reported by all five included trials, but after meta-analysis, there was no significant difference in any serious adverse event (death, acute cardiac insufficiency, rash dissemination, bacterial pneumonia or haematemesis) or non serious adverse event (dizziness, nausea, vomiting, hypertension or hyperglycaemia).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There was insufficient evidence to conclude that corticosteroids are safe or effective in the prevention of postherpetic neuralgia. More randomised controlled trials with a greater number of participants are needed to determine reliably whether there is real benefit (or harm) from the use of corticosteroid therapy to prevent postherpetic neuralgia. Future trials should measure function and quality of life.

PMID 18254083
M N Oxman, M J Levin, G R Johnson, K E Schmader, S E Straus, L D Gelb, R D Arbeit, M S Simberkoff, A A Gershon, L E Davis, A Weinberg, K D Boardman, H M Williams, J Hongyuan Zhang, P N Peduzzi, C E Beisel, V A Morrison, J C Guatelli, P A Brooks, C A Kauffman, C T Pachucki, K M Neuzil, R F Betts, P F Wright, M R Griffin, P Brunell, N E Soto, A R Marques, S K Keay, R P Goodman, D J Cotton, J W Gnann, J Loutit, M Holodniy, W A Keitel, G E Crawford, S-S Yeh, Z Lobo, J F Toney, R N Greenberg, P M Keller, R Harbecke, A R Hayward, M R Irwin, T C Kyriakides, C Y Chan, I S F Chan, W W B Wang, P W Annunziato, J L Silber, Shingles Prevention Study Group
A vaccine to prevent herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in older adults.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 2;352(22):2271-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051016.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: The incidence and severity of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia increase with age in association with a progressive decline in cell-mediated immunity to varicella-zoster virus (VZV). We tested the hypothesis that vaccination against VZV would decrease the incidence, severity, or both of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia among older adults.
METHODS: We enrolled 38,546 adults 60 years of age or older in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of an investigational live attenuated Oka/Merck VZV vaccine ("zoster vaccine"). Herpes zoster was diagnosed according to clinical and laboratory criteria. The pain and discomfort associated with herpes zoster were measured repeatedly for six months. The primary end point was the burden of illness due to herpes zoster, a measure affected by the incidence, severity, and duration of the associated pain and discomfort. The secondary end point was the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia.
RESULTS: More than 95 percent of the subjects continued in the study to its completion, with a median of 3.12 years of surveillance for herpes zoster. A total of 957 confirmed cases of herpes zoster (315 among vaccine recipients and 642 among placebo recipients) and 107 cases of postherpetic neuralgia (27 among vaccine recipients and 80 among placebo recipients) were included in the efficacy analysis. The use of the zoster vaccine reduced the burden of illness due to herpes zoster by 61.1 percent (P<0.001), reduced the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia by 66.5 percent (P<0.001), and reduced the incidence of herpes zoster by 51.3 percent (P<0.001). Reactions at the injection site were more frequent among vaccine recipients but were generally mild.
CONCLUSIONS: The zoster vaccine markedly reduced morbidity from herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia among older adults.

Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.
PMID 15930418
Michael N Oxman, Myron J Levin, Shingles Prevention Study Group
Vaccination against Herpes Zoster and Postherpetic Neuralgia.
J Infect Dis. 2008 Mar 1;197 Suppl 2:S228-36. doi: 10.1086/522159.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: Herpes zoster (HZ) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) cause significant morbidity in older adults. The incidence and severity of HZ and PHN increase with age in association with an age-related decline in varicella-zoster virus (VZV)-specific cell-mediated immunity (VZV-CMI). VZV vaccines can boost VZV-CMI. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that VZV vaccination would protect older adults against HZ and PHN.
METHODS: We enrolled 38,546 adults > or =60 years of age in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of an investigational HZ vaccine and actively followed subjects for the development of HZ. The primary end point was the burden of illness due to HZ (HZ BOI), a composite measure of the incidence, severity, and duration of pain and discomfort caused by HZ. The secondary end point was the incidence of PHN.
RESULTS: Subject retention was >95%. HZ vaccine reduced the HZ BOI by 61.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51.1%-69.1%; P<.001) and reduced the incidence of PHN by 66.5% (95% CI, 47.5%-79.2%; P<.001). The incidence of HZ was also reduced by 51.3% (95% CI, 44.2%-57.6%; P<.001). HZ vaccine was well tolerated; injection site reactions were generally mild. HZ vaccine neither caused nor induced HZ.
CONCLUSION: The Shingles Prevention Study demonstrated that HZ vaccine significantly reduced the morbidity due to HZ and PHN in older adults.

PMID 18419402
James F Mbinta, Binh P Nguyen, Prosper Mandela A Awuni, Janine Paynter, Colin R Simpson
Post-licensure zoster vaccine effectiveness against herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022 Apr;3(4):e263-e275. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00039-3. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: Given the substantial impact of herpes zoster on health and quality of life, and its considerable economic burden, prevention through vaccination is a priority. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the herpes zoster vaccines (recombinant zoster vaccine [RZV] and zoster vaccine live [ZVL]) against incident herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in older adults.
METHODS: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing the effectiveness of herpes zoster vaccines in adults aged 50 years or older, compared with no vaccination or another vaccine. We searched published literature on MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ProQuest Central, and Dimensions, as well as unpublished studies, grey literature, and the reference lists of included studies. Observational studies published in any language between May 25, 2006, and Dec 31, 2020, were included. Eligible studies were appraised for methodological quality using standardised critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute, and data were extracted from selected studies using a standardised tool. Random-effects meta-analysis models were used to estimate pooled vaccine effectiveness for outcomes of interest (herpes zoster, herpes zoster ophthalmicus, and postherpetic neuralgia) among clinically and methodologically comparable studies, with a fixed-effects model also used for herpes zoster ophthalmicus. Vaccine effectiveness was also assessed in people with comorbidities. As a post-hoc analysis, a forward citation search was done on Jan 31, 2021. This study is registered on PROSPERO, CRD42021232383.
FINDINGS: Our search identified 1240 studies, of which 1162 were excluded based on title and abstract screening. A further 56 articles were excluded on reading the full text. 22 studies (21 cohort studies and one case-control study, involving 9 536 086 participants and 3·35 million person-years in the USA, UK, Canada, and Sweden) were included in the quantitative analysis. Of these, 13 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The overall quality of evidence was very low for all outcomes. The pooled vaccine effectiveness for ZVL against herpes zoster in adults was 45·9% (95% CI 42·2-49·4; seven studies). The vaccine effectiveness for ZVL against postherpetic neuralgia was 59·7% (58·4-89·7; three studies) and against herpes zoster ophthalmicus (in a fixed-effects model) was 30·0% (20·5-38·4; two studies). ZVL was effective in preventing herpes zoster in people with comorbidities, including diabetes (vaccine effectiveness 49·8%, 45·1-54·1; three studies), chronic kidney disease (54·3%, 49·0-59·1; four studies), liver disease (52·9%, 41·6-62·1; two studies), heart disease (52·3%, 45·0-58·7; two studies), and lung disease (49·0%, 32·2-66·2; two studies). In a post-hoc analysis of two studies from the USA published after 2020, the pooled vaccine effectiveness for RZV against herpes zoster in adults was 79·2% (57·6-89·7). Substantial heterogeneity (I2≥75%) was observed in 50% of the meta-analyses.
INTERPRETATION: ZVL and RZV are effective in preventing herpes zoster in routine clinical practice. ZVL also reduces the risk of postherpetic neuralgia. Selection bias and confounding by unmeasured variables are inherent challenges of observational studies based on large health-care databases. Nevertheless, these findings will reassure policy makers, health practitioners, and the public that the vaccinations currently available for herpes zoster vaccination programmes are effective at preventing herpes zoster and related complications.
FUNDING: None.

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
PMID 36098300
Himal Lal, Anthony L Cunningham, Olivier Godeaux, Roman Chlibek, Javier Diez-Domingo, Shinn-Jang Hwang, Myron J Levin, Janet E McElhaney, Airi Poder, Joan Puig-Barberà, Timo Vesikari, Daisuke Watanabe, Lily Weckx, Toufik Zahaf, Thomas C Heineman, ZOE-50 Study Group
Efficacy of an adjuvanted herpes zoster subunit vaccine in older adults.
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 28;372(22):2087-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1501184. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: In previous phase 1-2 clinical trials involving older adults, a subunit vaccine containing varicella-zoster virus glycoprotein E and the AS01B adjuvant system (called HZ/su) had a clinically acceptable safety profile and elicited a robust immune response.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study in 18 countries to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HZ/su in older adults (≥50 years of age), stratified according to age group (50 to 59, 60 to 69, and ≥70 years). Participants received two intramuscular doses of the vaccine or placebo 2 months apart. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of the vaccine, as compared with placebo, in reducing the risk of herpes zoster in older adults.
RESULTS: A total of 15,411 participants who could be evaluated received either the vaccine (7698 participants) or placebo (7713 participants). During a mean follow-up of 3.2 years, herpes zoster was confirmed in 6 participants in the vaccine group and in 210 participants in the placebo group (incidence rate, 0.3 vs. 9.1 per 1000 person-years) in the modified vaccinated cohort. Overall vaccine efficacy against herpes zoster was 97.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.7 to 99.0; P<0.001). Vaccine efficacy was between 96.6% and 97.9% for all age groups. Solicited reports of injection-site and systemic reactions within 7 days after vaccination were more frequent in the vaccine group. There were solicited or unsolicited reports of grade 3 symptoms in 17.0% of vaccine recipients and 3.2% of placebo recipients. The proportions of participants who had serious adverse events or potential immune-mediated diseases or who died were similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The HZ/su vaccine significantly reduced the risk of herpes zoster in adults who were 50 years of age or older. Vaccine efficacy in adults who were 70 years of age or older was similar to that in the other two age groups. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals; ZOE-50 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01165177.).

PMID 25916341
Anthony L Cunningham, Himal Lal, Martina Kovac, Roman Chlibek, Shinn-Jang Hwang, Javier Díez-Domingo, Olivier Godeaux, Myron J Levin, Janet E McElhaney, Joan Puig-Barberà, Carline Vanden Abeele, Timo Vesikari, Daisuke Watanabe, Toufik Zahaf, Anitta Ahonen, Eugene Athan, Jose F Barba-Gomez, Laura Campora, Ferdinandus de Looze, H Jackson Downey, Wayne Ghesquiere, Iris Gorfinkel, Tiina Korhonen, Edward Leung, Shelly A McNeil, Lidia Oostvogels, Lars Rombo, Jan Smetana, Lily Weckx, Wilfred Yeo, Thomas C Heineman, ZOE-70 Study Group
Efficacy of the Herpes Zoster Subunit Vaccine in Adults 70 Years of Age or Older.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 15;375(11):1019-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603800.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: A trial involving adults 50 years of age or older (ZOE-50) showed that the herpes zoster subunit vaccine (HZ/su) containing recombinant varicella-zoster virus glycoprotein E and the AS01B adjuvant system was associated with a risk of herpes zoster that was 97.2% lower than that associated with placebo. A second trial was performed concurrently at the same sites and examined the safety and efficacy of HZ/su in adults 70 years of age or older (ZOE-70).
METHODS: This randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was conducted in 18 countries and involved adults 70 years of age or older. Participants received two doses of HZ/su or placebo (assigned in a 1:1 ratio) administered intramuscularly 2 months apart. Vaccine efficacy against herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia was assessed in participants from ZOE-70 and in participants pooled from ZOE-70 and ZOE-50.
RESULTS: In ZOE-70, 13,900 participants who could be evaluated (mean age, 75.6 years) received either HZ/su (6950 participants) or placebo (6950 participants). During a mean follow-up period of 3.7 years, herpes zoster occurred in 23 HZ/su recipients and in 223 placebo recipients (0.9 vs. 9.2 per 1000 person-years). Vaccine efficacy against herpes zoster was 89.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.2 to 93.7; P<0.001) and was similar in participants 70 to 79 years of age (90.0%) and participants 80 years of age or older (89.1%). In pooled analyses of data from participants 70 years of age or older in ZOE-50 and ZOE-70 (16,596 participants), vaccine efficacy against herpes zoster was 91.3% (95% CI, 86.8 to 94.5; P<0.001), and vaccine efficacy against postherpetic neuralgia was 88.8% (95% CI, 68.7 to 97.1; P<0.001). Solicited reports of injection-site and systemic reactions within 7 days after injection were more frequent among HZ/su recipients than among placebo recipients (79.0% vs. 29.5%). Serious adverse events, potential immune-mediated diseases, and deaths occurred with similar frequencies in the two study groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In our trial, HZ/su was found to reduce the risks of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia among adults 70 years of age or older. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals; ZOE-50 and ZOE-70 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01165177 and NCT01165229 .).

PMID 27626517
Yuwei Sun, Eric Kim, Christina L Kong, Benjamin F Arnold, Travis C Porco, Nisha R Acharya
Effectiveness of the Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in Adults Aged 50 and Older in the United States: A Claims-Based Cohort Study.
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 15;73(6):949-956. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab121.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: The recombinant zoster vaccine had over 90% efficacy in preventing herpes zoster in clinical trials. However, its effectiveness outside of a clinical trial setting has not been investigated. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the recombinant zoster vaccine in general practice.
METHODS: A de-identified administrative claims database, the OptumLabs Data Warehouse, was used to conduct this retrospective cohort study to assess the effectiveness of the recombinant zoster vaccine against herpes zoster in nonimmunocompromised, vaccine age-eligible individuals enrolled in the database for ≥365 days.
RESULTS: A total of 4 769 819 adults were included in this study, with 173 745 (3.6%) adults receiving 2 valid doses of the recombinant zoster vaccine. The incidence rate of herpes zoster was 258.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 230.0-289.4) cases per 100 000 person-years in vaccinated persons compared with 893.1 (95% CI, 886.2-900.0) in unvaccinated persons. Recombinant zoster vaccine effectiveness was 85.5% (95% CI, 83.5-87.3%) overall, with an effectiveness of 86.8% (95% CI, 84.6-88.7%) in individuals 50 to 79 years old compared with 80.3% (95% CI, 75.1-84.3%) in individuals aged 80 and older. In patients with a history of live zoster vaccine within 5 years of study inclusion, vaccine effectiveness was 84.8% (95% CI, 75.3-90.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Recombinant zoster vaccine effectiveness against herpes zoster was high in a real-world setting. Given the low vaccine coverage and high effectiveness, a major public health effort is needed to identify and address barriers to vaccination and increase immunization rates.

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
PMID 33580245
Hector S Izurieta, Xiyuan Wu, Richard Forshee, Yun Lu, Heng-Ming Sung, Paula Ehrlich Agger, Yoganand Chillarige, Ruth Link-Gelles, Bradley Lufkin, Michael Wernecke, Thomas E MaCurdy, Jeffrey Kelman, Kathleen Dooling
Recombinant Zoster Vaccine (Shingrix): Real-World Effectiveness in the First 2 Years Post-Licensure.
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 15;73(6):941-948. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab125.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: Shingrix (recombinant zoster vaccine) was licensed to prevent herpes zoster, dispensed as 2 doses given 2-6 months apart among adults aged ≥50 years. Clinical trials yielded efficacy of >90% for confirmed herpes zoster, but post-market performance has not been evaluated. Efficacy of a single dose and a delayed second dose and efficacy among persons with autoimmune or immunosuppressive conditions have not been studied. We aimed to assess post-market vaccine effectiveness of Shingrix.
METHODS: We conducted a cohort study among Medicare Part D community-dwelling beneficiaries aged >65 years. Herpes zoster was identified using a medical office visit diagnosis with treatment, and postherpetic neuralgia was identified using a validated algorithm. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to improve cohort balance and marginal structural models to estimate hazard ratios.
RESULTS: We found a vaccine effectiveness of 70.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.6-71.5) and 56.9% (95% CI, 55.0-58.8) for 2 and 1 doses, respectively. The 2-dose vaccine effectiveness was not significantly lower for beneficiaries aged >80 years, for second doses received at ≥180 days, or for individuals with autoimmune conditions. The vaccine was also effective among individuals with immunosuppressive conditions. Two-dose vaccine effectiveness against postherpetic neuralgia was 76.0% (95% CI, 68.4-81.8).
CONCLUSIONS: This large real-world observational study of the effectiveness of Shingrix demonstrates the benefit of completing the 2-dose regimen. Second doses administered beyond the recommended 6 months did not impair effectiveness. Our effectiveness estimates were lower than the clinical trials estimates, likely due to differences in outcome specificity.

Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2021.
PMID 33580242
Adriana Bastidas, Javier de la Serna, Mohamed El Idrissi, Lidia Oostvogels, Philippe Quittet, Javier López-Jiménez, Filiz Vural, David Pohlreich, Tsila Zuckerman, Nicolas C Issa, Gianluca Gaidano, Je-Jung Lee, Sunil Abhyankar, Carlos Solano, Jaime Perez de Oteyza, Michael J Satlin, Stefan Schwartz, Magda Campins, Alberto Rocci, Carlos Vallejo Llamas, Dong-Gun Lee, Sen Mui Tan, Anna M Johnston, Andrew Grigg, Michael J Boeckh, Laura Campora, Marta Lopez-Fauqued, Thomas C Heineman, Edward A Stadtmauer, Keith M Sullivan, ZOE-HSCT Study Group Collaborators
Effect of Recombinant Zoster Vaccine on Incidence of Herpes Zoster After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA. 2019 Jul 9;322(2):123-133. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.9053.
Abstract/Text IMPORTANCE: Herpes zoster, a frequent complication following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), is associated with significant morbidity. A nonlive adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine has been developed to prevent posttransplantation zoster.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and adverse event profile of the recombinant zoster vaccine in immunocompromised autologous HSCT recipients.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Phase 3, randomized, observer-blinded study conducted in 167 centers in 28 countries between July 13, 2012, and February 1, 2017, among 1846 patients aged 18 years or older who had undergone recent autologous HSCT.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to receive 2 doses of either recombinant zoster vaccine (n = 922) or placebo (n = 924) administered into the deltoid muscle; the first dose was given 50 to 70 days after transplantation and the second dose 1 to 2 months thereafter.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was occurrence of confirmed herpes zoster cases.
RESULTS: Among 1846 autologous HSCT recipients (mean age, 55 years; 688 [37%] women) who received 1 vaccine or placebo dose, 1735 (94%) received a second dose and 1366 (74%) completed the study. During the 21-month median follow-up, at least 1 herpes zoster episode was confirmed in 49 vaccine and 135 placebo recipients (incidence, 30 and 94 per 1000 person-years, respectively), an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.32 (95% CI, 0.22-0.44; P < .001), equivalent to 68.2% vaccine efficacy. Of 8 secondary end points, 3 showed significant reductions in incidence of postherpetic neuralgia (vaccine, n=1; placebo, n=9; IRR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.00-0.78; P = .02) and of other prespecified herpes zoster-related complications (vaccine, n=3; placebo, n=13; IRR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.04-0.81; P = .02) and in duration of severe worst herpes zoster-associated pain (vaccine, 892.0 days; placebo, 6275.0 days; hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.89; P = .01). Five secondary objectives were descriptive. Injection site reactions were recorded in 86% of vaccine and 10% of placebo recipients, of which pain was the most common, occurring in 84% of vaccine recipients (grade 3: 11%). Unsolicited and serious adverse events, potentially immune-mediated diseases, and underlying disease relapses were similar between groups at all time points.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among adults who had undergone autologous HSCT, a 2-dose course of recombinant zoster vaccine compared with placebo significantly reduced the incidence of herpes zoster over a median follow-up of 21 months.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01610414.

PMID 31287523
Alemnew F Dagnew, Osman Ilhan, Won-Sik Lee, Dariusz Woszczyk, Jae-Yong Kwak, Stella Bowcock, Sang Kyun Sohn, Gabriela Rodriguez Macías, Tzeon-Jye Chiou, Dimas Quiel, Mickael Aoun, Maria Belen Navarro Matilla, Javier de la Serna, Samuel Milliken, John Murphy, Shelly A McNeil, Bruno Salaun, Emmanuel Di Paolo, Laura Campora, Marta López-Fauqued, Mohamed El Idrissi, Anne Schuind, Thomas C Heineman, Peter Van den Steen, Lidia Oostvogels, Zoster-039 study group
Immunogenicity and safety of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine in adults with haematological malignancies: a phase 3, randomised, clinical trial and post-hoc efficacy analysis.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Sep;19(9):988-1000. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30163-X. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
Abstract/Text BACKGROUND: The adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (Shingrix) can prevent herpes zoster in older adults and autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of this vaccine in adults with haematological malignancies receiving immunosuppressive cancer treatments.
METHODS: In this phase 3, randomised, observer-blind, placebo-controlled study, done at 77 centres worldwide, we randomly assigned (1:1) patients with haematological malignancies aged 18 years and older to receive two doses of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine or placebo 1-2 months apart during or after immunosuppressive cancer treatments, and stratified participants according to their underlying diseases. The co-primary objectives of the study were the evaluation of safety and reactogenicity of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine compared with placebo from the first vaccination up to 30 days after last vaccination in all participants; evaluation of the proportion of participants with a vaccine response in terms of anti-glycoprotein E humoral immune response to the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine at month 2 in all participants, excluding those with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; and evaluation of the anti-glycoprotein E humoral immune responses to the vaccine compared with placebo at month 2 in all participants, excluding those with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. We assessed immunogenicity in the per-protocol cohort for immunogenicity and safety in the total vaccinated cohort. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01767467, and with the EU Clinical Trials Register, number 2012-003438-18.
FINDINGS: Between March 1, 2013, and Sept 10, 2015, we randomly assigned 286 participants to adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine and 283 to placebo. 283 in the vaccine group and 279 in the placebo group were vaccinated. At month 2, 119 (80·4%, 95% CI 73·1-86·5) of 148 participants had a humoral vaccine response to adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine, compared with one (0·8%, 0·0-4·2) of 130 participants in the placebo group, and the adjusted geometric mean anti-glycoprotein E antibody concentration was 23 132·9 mIU/mL (95% CI 16 642·8-32 153·9) in the vaccine group and 777·6 mIU/mL (702·8-860·3) in the placebo group (adjusted geometric mean ratio 29·75, 21·09-41·96; p<0·0001) in all patients, excluding those with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses persisted above baseline until month 13 in all strata and, as expected, vaccine was more reactogenic than placebo (within 7 days after vaccination pain was reported by 221 [79·5%] of 278 vaccine group participants and 45 [16·4%] of 274 placebo group participants; fatigue was reported by 162 [58·3%] of 278 vaccine group participants and 102 [37·2%] of 274 placebo group participants). Incidences of unsolicited or serious adverse events, potential immune-mediated diseases, disease-related events, and fatal serious adverse events were similar between the groups.
INTERPRETATION: The immunocompromised adult population with haematological malignancies is at high risk for herpes zoster. The adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine, which is currently licensed in certain countries for adults aged 50 years and older, is likely to benefit this population.
FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PMID 31399377
Alemnew F Dagnew, Debora Rausch, Caroline Hervé, Toufik Zahaf, Myron J Levin, Anne Schuind, ZOE-50/70 study group
Efficacy and serious adverse events profile of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine in adults with pre-existing potential immune-mediated diseases: a pooled post hoc analysis on two parallel randomized trials.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Mar 2;60(3):1226-1233. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa424.
Abstract/Text ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: In the ZOE-50 (NCT01165177) and ZOE-70 (NCT01165229) phase 3 clinical trials, the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) demonstrated ≥90% efficacy in preventing herpes zoster (HZ) in all age groups ≥50 years. Given the increased HZ risk associated with certain underlying autoimmune diseases or their treatment regimes, we conducted a post hoc analysis of RZV's efficacy against HZ and safety profile [specifically, the occurrence of serious adverse events (SAEs)] in ZOE-50/70 participants who reported pre-existing potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) at enrolment and were not on immunosuppressive therapies.
METHODS: Adults aged ≥50 (ZOE-50) and ≥70 (ZOE-70) years were randomized to receive two doses of RZV or placebo 2 months apart. In this subgroup analysis of participants with at least one pIMD at enrolment, the efficacy was calculated for two-dose recipients who did not develop confirmed HZ before 30 days post-dose 2. SAE occurrence was evaluated for all participants who received at least one dose.
RESULTS: Of the 14 645 RZV and 14 660 placebo recipients from the ZOE-50/70 studies, 983 and 960, respectively, reported at least one pre-existing pIMD at enrolment and were included in these analyses. The most frequent pre-existing conditions were psoriasis, spondyloarthropathy and RA. Efficacy against HZ was 90.5% (95% CI: 73.5, 97.5%) overall with the lowest being 84.4% (95% CI: 30.8, 98.3%) in the 70-79-year-old age group. SAEs and fatal SAEs were similar between RZV and placebo recipients.
CONCLUSION: In ZOE-50/70 participants with pre-existing pIMDs, RZV was highly efficacious against HZ and SAE incidence was similar between RZV and placebo recipients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01165177 (ZOE-50), NCT01165229 (ZOE-70).

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.
PMID 32910152
Tara C Anderson, Nina B Masters, Angela Guo, Leah Shepersky, Andrew J Leidner, Grace M Lee, Camille N Kotton, Kathleen L Dooling
Use of Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in Immunocompromised Adults Aged ≥19 Years: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, 2022.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 21;71(3):80-84. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7103a2. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
Abstract/Text Zoster Vaccine Recombinant, Adjuvanted (Shingrix, GlaxoSmithKline [GSK]) is a 2-dose (0.5 mL each) subunit vaccine containing recombinant glycoprotein E in combination with adjuvant (AS01B) that was licensed in the United States for prevention of herpes zoster for adults aged ≥50 years by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and recommended for immunocompetent adults aged ≥50 years by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) in 2017* (1). On July 23, 2021, the FDA expanded the indication for recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) to include adults aged ≥18 years who are or will be at increased risk for herpes zoster because of immunodeficiency or immunosuppression caused by known disease or therapy (2). On October 20, 2021, ACIP recommended 2 doses of RZV for the prevention of herpes zoster and related complications in adults aged ≥19 years† who are or will be immunodeficient or immunosuppressed because of disease or therapy. RZV is the first herpes zoster vaccine approved for use in immunocompromised persons. With moderate to high vaccine efficacy and an acceptable safety profile, RZV has the potential to prevent considerable herpes zoster incidence and related complications. This report updates previous ACIP recommendations for the prevention of herpes zoster (1,3).

PMID 35051134
薬剤監修について:
オーダー内の薬剤用量は日本医科大学付属病院 薬剤部 部長 伊勢雄也 以下、渡邉裕次、井ノ口岳洋、梅田将光および日本医科大学多摩永山病院 副薬剤部長 林太祐による疑義照会のプロセスを実施、疑義照会の対象については著者の方による再確認を実施しております。
※薬剤中分類、用法、同効薬、診療報酬は、エルゼビアが独自に作成した薬剤情報であり、 著者により作成された情報ではありません。
尚、用法は添付文書より、同効薬は、薬剤師監修のもとで作成しております。
※同効薬・小児・妊娠および授乳中の注意事項等は、海外の情報も掲載しており、日本の医療事情に適応しない場合があります。
※薬剤情報の(適外/適内/⽤量内/⽤量外/㊜)等の表記は、エルゼビアジャパン編集部によって記載日時にレセプトチェックソフトなどで確認し作成しております。ただし、これらの記載は、実際の保険適応の査定において保険適応及び保険適応外と判断されることを保証するものではありません。また、検査薬、輸液、血液製剤、全身麻酔薬、抗癌剤等の薬剤は保険適応の記載の一部を割愛させていただいています。
(詳細はこちらを参照)
著者のCOI(Conflicts of Interest)開示:
篠原 浩 : 特に申告事項無し[2024年]
監修:山本舜悟 : 特に申告事項無し[2025年]

ページ上部に戻る

帯状疱疹(感染症科)

戻る